Long-term evidence of nitrogen removal from four decades of wetland restoration in agricultural landscapes in Denmark

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nichlas Hermansen, Rasmus J. Petersen, Carl C. Hoffmann, Ane Kjeldgaard, Hans Thodsen, Dominik H. Zak, Brian Kronvang, Søren E. Larsen, Joachim Audet
{"title":"Long-term evidence of nitrogen removal from four decades of wetland restoration in agricultural landscapes in Denmark","authors":"Nichlas Hermansen,&nbsp;Rasmus J. Petersen,&nbsp;Carl C. Hoffmann,&nbsp;Ane Kjeldgaard,&nbsp;Hans Thodsen,&nbsp;Dominik H. Zak,&nbsp;Brian Kronvang,&nbsp;Søren E. Larsen,&nbsp;Joachim Audet","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wetland restoration is increasingly used as a tool to mitigate nitrogen losses from agricultural landscapes and reduce the risk of eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems. However, the effectiveness of this measure remains highly variable and difficult to predict. In this study, data from 35 restored wetlands in Denmark were analyzed to assess the effect of wetland restoration on nitrogen removal. The results showed that these wetlands removed an average of 110 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for total nitrogen and 130 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for nitrate, although there was considerable variation between wetland sites. On average, 39 % of the incoming nitrate load was removed and 26 % of the total nitrogen. Beta regression models showed that annual TN load explained more variability in nitrate (46 %) and total nitrogen (41 %) removal than hydraulic loading rate, which accounted for 30 % and 22 %, respectively. These findings confirm the effectiveness of restored wetlands as a valuable tool for mitigating nitrogen pollution in agricultural landscapes. However, a decline in the effectiveness of newer restoration projects, potentially due to reduced nitrogen losses from agricultural fields and less stringent eligibility criteria for restoration was observed. While national upscaling confirms the importance of wetland restoration, it also highlights the need for supplementary measures to control agricultural nitrogen losses, as current efforts may not be sufficient to achieve a good ecological status in Danish coastal waters, as required by regulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 109924"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925004566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wetland restoration is increasingly used as a tool to mitigate nitrogen losses from agricultural landscapes and reduce the risk of eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems. However, the effectiveness of this measure remains highly variable and difficult to predict. In this study, data from 35 restored wetlands in Denmark were analyzed to assess the effect of wetland restoration on nitrogen removal. The results showed that these wetlands removed an average of 110 kg N ha−1 yr−1 for total nitrogen and 130 kg N ha−1 yr−1 for nitrate, although there was considerable variation between wetland sites. On average, 39 % of the incoming nitrate load was removed and 26 % of the total nitrogen. Beta regression models showed that annual TN load explained more variability in nitrate (46 %) and total nitrogen (41 %) removal than hydraulic loading rate, which accounted for 30 % and 22 %, respectively. These findings confirm the effectiveness of restored wetlands as a valuable tool for mitigating nitrogen pollution in agricultural landscapes. However, a decline in the effectiveness of newer restoration projects, potentially due to reduced nitrogen losses from agricultural fields and less stringent eligibility criteria for restoration was observed. While national upscaling confirms the importance of wetland restoration, it also highlights the need for supplementary measures to control agricultural nitrogen losses, as current efforts may not be sufficient to achieve a good ecological status in Danish coastal waters, as required by regulations.
丹麦农业景观中40年湿地恢复中氮去除的长期证据
湿地恢复越来越多地被用作减轻农业景观氮损失和减少水生生态系统富营养化风险的工具。然而,这一措施的有效性仍然变数很大,难以预测。本研究分析了丹麦35个恢复湿地的数据,以评估湿地恢复对氮去除的影响。结果表明,这些湿地对总氮的平均去除量为110 kg N ha−1 yr−1,对硝态氮的平均去除量为130 kg N ha−1 yr−1,但不同湿地间差异较大。平均去除39 %的硝态氮负荷和26 %的总氮。Beta回归模型显示,与水力负荷相比,TN年负荷对硝酸盐(46 %)和总氮(41 %)去除率的解释更大,水力负荷分别占30 %和22 %。这些发现证实了恢复湿地作为减轻农业景观氮污染的宝贵工具的有效性。然而,新的恢复项目的有效性有所下降,可能是由于农田氮损失减少和恢复资格标准不太严格。虽然国家的升级确认了湿地恢复的重要性,但它也强调了需要采取补充措施来控制农业氮损失,因为目前的努力可能不足以按照法规的要求在丹麦沿海水域实现良好的生态状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信