A systematic study on the energy absorption performance of plate-lattices: performance, design, and optimization

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Yuan Zhang  (, ), Suli Ma  (, ), Wu Xu  (, ), Liang Zhang  (, ), Hong Xu  (, ), Mengxin Ma  (, ), Zhiyuan Wu  (, ), Boyang Lv  (, ), Xiaohu Liu  (, )
{"title":"A systematic study on the energy absorption performance of plate-lattices: performance, design, and optimization","authors":"Yuan Zhang \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Suli Ma \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Wu Xu \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Liang Zhang \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Hong Xu \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Mengxin Ma \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Zhiyuan Wu \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Boyang Lv \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Xiaohu Liu \n (,&nbsp;)","doi":"10.1007/s10409-025-24493-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The energy absorption performance (EAP) of plate-lattices was systematically investigated, both independently and when applied to square-tube filling. Based on this, an optimization design model for the crashworthiness of lattice-filled structures was established. The results indicate that among the three basic plate-lattices, the FCC has the best overall EAP. When subjected to three-point bending loads, the curvature of thin-walled tubes and the number of filling cells do not significantly enhance EAP; increasing the wall thickness can improve the specific energy absorption (SEA), but wall thickness has a significant impact on the peak crushing force (PCF)—as the wall thickness increases, the PCF also increases; increasing the relative density can enhance both SEA and PCF, but its energy absorption stability (EAS) initially improves and then weakens. When considering density distribution, placing more material in the middle part of the structure results in better EAP. Under axial loads, curved-tubes have lower SEA and poorer EAS compared to straight-tubes; when considering oblique loading, smaller tilt angles have less impact on the EAP; increasing the number of cells reduces the EAP but can improve EAS. Additionally, the optimization model proposed in this paper can significantly enhance the EAP of the designed structure.\n</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7109,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","volume":"42 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10409-025-24493-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The energy absorption performance (EAP) of plate-lattices was systematically investigated, both independently and when applied to square-tube filling. Based on this, an optimization design model for the crashworthiness of lattice-filled structures was established. The results indicate that among the three basic plate-lattices, the FCC has the best overall EAP. When subjected to three-point bending loads, the curvature of thin-walled tubes and the number of filling cells do not significantly enhance EAP; increasing the wall thickness can improve the specific energy absorption (SEA), but wall thickness has a significant impact on the peak crushing force (PCF)—as the wall thickness increases, the PCF also increases; increasing the relative density can enhance both SEA and PCF, but its energy absorption stability (EAS) initially improves and then weakens. When considering density distribution, placing more material in the middle part of the structure results in better EAP. Under axial loads, curved-tubes have lower SEA and poorer EAS compared to straight-tubes; when considering oblique loading, smaller tilt angles have less impact on the EAP; increasing the number of cells reduces the EAP but can improve EAS. Additionally, the optimization model proposed in this paper can significantly enhance the EAP of the designed structure.

板栅吸能性能的系统研究:性能、设计与优化
系统地研究了板格的吸能性能(EAP),并将其应用于方管填充。在此基础上,建立了网格填充结构耐撞性优化设计模型。结果表明,在三种基本板格中,FCC具有最佳的整体EAP。在三点弯曲荷载作用下,薄壁管的曲率和填充单元的数量对EAP没有显著提高;增加壁厚可以提高比能吸收(SEA),但壁厚对峰值破碎力(PCF)有显著影响——随着壁厚的增加,PCF也随之增加;增加相对密度可以增强SEA和PCF,但其能量吸收稳定性(EAS)先提高后减弱。在考虑密度分布的情况下,在结构中部放置更多的材料可以获得更好的EAP。在轴向载荷作用下,弯管的SEA比直管低,EAS比直管差;考虑倾斜载荷时,较小的倾斜角度对EAP的影响较小;增加细胞数可降低EAP,但可改善EAP。此外,本文提出的优化模型可以显著提高所设计结构的EAP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Mechanica Sinica
Acta Mechanica Sinica 物理-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
1807
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Mechanica Sinica, sponsored by the Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, promotes scientific exchanges and collaboration among Chinese scientists in China and abroad. It features high quality, original papers in all aspects of mechanics and mechanical sciences. Not only does the journal explore the classical subdivisions of theoretical and applied mechanics such as solid and fluid mechanics, it also explores recently emerging areas such as biomechanics and nanomechanics. In addition, the journal investigates analytical, computational, and experimental progresses in all areas of mechanics. Lastly, it encourages research in interdisciplinary subjects, serving as a bridge between mechanics and other branches of engineering and the sciences. In addition to research papers, Acta Mechanica Sinica publishes reviews, notes, experimental techniques, scientific events, and other special topics of interest. Related subjects » Classical Continuum Physics - Computational Intelligence and Complexity - Mechanics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信