Sepsis as a complex syndrome: Are combined biomarkers the future of diagnosis and prognosis? Clinical perspective

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Immunology letters Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.imlet.2025.107072
R. Gaderparnah , F. van Beuningen , Y. Lin , S.H. Sadrian , H.M. Reijneveld , H. Krabbe , P. Jonkheijm , H.R. Bouma , R.T. Mankowski
{"title":"Sepsis as a complex syndrome: Are combined biomarkers the future of diagnosis and prognosis? Clinical perspective","authors":"R. Gaderparnah ,&nbsp;F. van Beuningen ,&nbsp;Y. Lin ,&nbsp;S.H. Sadrian ,&nbsp;H.M. Reijneveld ,&nbsp;H. Krabbe ,&nbsp;P. Jonkheijm ,&nbsp;H.R. Bouma ,&nbsp;R.T. Mankowski","doi":"10.1016/j.imlet.2025.107072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality worldwide, driven by a dysregulated host response to infection that leads to life-threatening organ dysfunction. Despite advances in evidence-based medicine, early diagnosis and risk stratification remain significant challenges due to the complex, multifaceted nature of sepsis and substantial interindividual variability in clinical presentation. Current approaches relying on single biomarkers cannot provide comprehensive insights into disease progression, limiting their clinical utility in guiding timely and effective interventions. Given the limitations of current single biomarkers in capturing the complexity of sepsis, there is an urgent need for improved diagnostic approaches. While the discovery of novel biomarkers remains important, combining existing biomarkers may offer a pragmatic and effective strategy to improve diagnostic accuracy by leveraging the strengths of each to compensate for the limitations of other. In this clinical perspective, we highlight the potential of such combined biomarker strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy, support identification of the infection source, and improve prognostic assessment across the clinical course and into long-term outcomes. We provide examples of key biomarkers and their synergistic potential, emphasizing the need for advanced analytical methods such as machine learning and multi-omics integration to enhance predictive accuracy. Shifting toward multi-component biomarker panels represents a critical step toward a more precise, personalized approach to sepsis management to reduce sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. We advocate for further research and validation efforts to facilitate the clinical implementation of combined biomarker models, ultimately transforming sepsis care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13413,"journal":{"name":"Immunology letters","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 107072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165247825001051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality worldwide, driven by a dysregulated host response to infection that leads to life-threatening organ dysfunction. Despite advances in evidence-based medicine, early diagnosis and risk stratification remain significant challenges due to the complex, multifaceted nature of sepsis and substantial interindividual variability in clinical presentation. Current approaches relying on single biomarkers cannot provide comprehensive insights into disease progression, limiting their clinical utility in guiding timely and effective interventions. Given the limitations of current single biomarkers in capturing the complexity of sepsis, there is an urgent need for improved diagnostic approaches. While the discovery of novel biomarkers remains important, combining existing biomarkers may offer a pragmatic and effective strategy to improve diagnostic accuracy by leveraging the strengths of each to compensate for the limitations of other. In this clinical perspective, we highlight the potential of such combined biomarker strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy, support identification of the infection source, and improve prognostic assessment across the clinical course and into long-term outcomes. We provide examples of key biomarkers and their synergistic potential, emphasizing the need for advanced analytical methods such as machine learning and multi-omics integration to enhance predictive accuracy. Shifting toward multi-component biomarker panels represents a critical step toward a more precise, personalized approach to sepsis management to reduce sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. We advocate for further research and validation efforts to facilitate the clinical implementation of combined biomarker models, ultimately transforming sepsis care.
脓毒症作为一种复杂的综合征:联合生物标志物是诊断和预后的未来吗?临床的角度
脓毒症仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,由宿主对感染的反应失调导致危及生命的器官功能障碍。尽管循证医学取得了进步,但由于脓毒症的复杂性、多面性和临床表现的个体差异,早期诊断和风险分层仍然是一个重大挑战。目前依赖单一生物标志物的方法不能提供对疾病进展的全面了解,限制了它们在指导及时有效干预方面的临床应用。鉴于目前单一生物标志物在捕捉败血症复杂性方面的局限性,迫切需要改进诊断方法。虽然发现新的生物标记物仍然很重要,但结合现有的生物标记物可能提供一种实用有效的策略,通过利用每种生物标记物的优势来弥补其他生物标记物的局限性,从而提高诊断的准确性。从临床角度来看,我们强调了这种联合生物标志物策略的潜力,以提高诊断准确性,支持感染源的识别,并改善整个临床过程和长期结果的预后评估。我们提供了关键生物标志物及其协同潜力的例子,强调需要先进的分析方法,如机器学习和多组学集成,以提高预测准确性。转向多组分生物标志物面板是朝着更精确、个性化的脓毒症管理方法迈出的关键一步,可以降低脓毒症相关的发病率和死亡率。我们提倡进一步的研究和验证工作,以促进联合生物标志物模型的临床实施,最终改变败血症的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunology letters
Immunology letters 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Immunology Letters provides a vehicle for the speedy publication of experimental papers, (mini)Reviews and Letters to the Editor addressing all aspects of molecular and cellular immunology. The essential criteria for publication will be clarity, experimental soundness and novelty. Results contradictory to current accepted thinking or ideas divergent from actual dogmas will be considered for publication provided that they are based on solid experimental findings. Preference will be given to papers of immediate importance to other investigators, either by their experimental data, new ideas or new methodology. Scientific correspondence to the Editor-in-Chief related to the published papers may also be accepted provided that they are short and scientifically relevant to the papers mentioned, in order to provide a continuing forum for discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书