Marginal abatement costs of direct carbon emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants: Insights for prioritizing pollution removal or carbon mitigation in collaborative control strategies
Runyao Huang , Junran Liu , Ange Song , Haoran Wu , Huiping Li , Jing Zhang , Hongtao Wang
{"title":"Marginal abatement costs of direct carbon emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants: Insights for prioritizing pollution removal or carbon mitigation in collaborative control strategies","authors":"Runyao Huang , Junran Liu , Ange Song , Haoran Wu , Huiping Li , Jing Zhang , Hongtao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) possess potential on collaborative carbon-pollutant control, as they directly emit methane and nitrous oxide during biochemical treatment apart from indirect emissions. This study quantified marginal abatement costs (MACs) of direct emissions to characterize MWWTPs’ carbon-pollutant synergy degree and calculated carbon quota involving compliance state with China’s national discharge standard (GB 18918-2002) to identify priority on pollutant removal or carbon mitigation. Quantified from direct emissions measured in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) and total oxygen demand (TOD) removal amount, 4594 MWWTPs’ MACs showed variation (1.292∼2.612 kg TOD/kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) with scale as the dominant factor. In quota, carbon reduction potential (5.89 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) prominently outweighed pollutant removal demand (0.10 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq). Policy implications were proposed based on effects of scale economies and regional socioeconomic conditions. The evaluation framework of MACs and quota might also suit other countries’ MWWTPs to manage carbon footprint and guide low-carbon transformations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108564"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) possess potential on collaborative carbon-pollutant control, as they directly emit methane and nitrous oxide during biochemical treatment apart from indirect emissions. This study quantified marginal abatement costs (MACs) of direct emissions to characterize MWWTPs’ carbon-pollutant synergy degree and calculated carbon quota involving compliance state with China’s national discharge standard (GB 18918-2002) to identify priority on pollutant removal or carbon mitigation. Quantified from direct emissions measured in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) and total oxygen demand (TOD) removal amount, 4594 MWWTPs’ MACs showed variation (1.292∼2.612 kg TOD/kg CO2-eq) with scale as the dominant factor. In quota, carbon reduction potential (5.89 million kg CO2-eq) prominently outweighed pollutant removal demand (0.10 million kg CO2-eq). Policy implications were proposed based on effects of scale economies and regional socioeconomic conditions. The evaluation framework of MACs and quota might also suit other countries’ MWWTPs to manage carbon footprint and guide low-carbon transformations.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.