Herbert Peeples , Emily Achter , Christopher Dieyi , Keshia Maughn
{"title":"Health care burden of access barriers to epilepsy care in the United States: A claims-based analysis of payer channels","authors":"Herbert Peeples , Emily Achter , Christopher Dieyi , Keshia Maughn","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2025.107639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe access challenges, barriers to antiseizure medications (ASMs), and impact of ASM formulary policies for patients with epilepsy (PWE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational study of de-identified claims from an all-payer claims database (2014–2021) and a formulary/payer policy database. Adults prescribed ≥ 1 ASM following initial epilepsy diagnosis, with continuous medical/pharmacy benefits, were included. Demographic characteristics, proximity to/use of a neurology health care professional (HCP), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 35,351, 33,339, and 24,722 PWE with commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance, respectively, were included. The Medicare group was older, had a higher comorbidity index score, more males, and fewer non-White and Hispanic individuals versus other groups. Most (> 58 %) commercially-insured PWE had coverage to all six first-generation ASMs examined, six to 12 second-generation ASMs, and all four third-generation ASMs; coverage rates were higher for Medicaid while data for Medicare were incomplete. Most commercial and Medicaid PWE had no access requirements to first-generation ASMs; approximately two-thirds and half of patients had access requirements for second- and third-generation ASMs, respectively. Although > 90 % of PWE used a neurology HCP during follow-up, only about one-third lived within proximity. Of PWE with formulary data (N = 77,787), > 80 % and < 8.0 % were prescribed second- and third-generation ASMs, respectively. There were no clear patterns in epilepsy-related HCRU/cost.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Data revealed difficulties in neurologist access and predominant use of second-generation ASMs, despite access restrictions for many PWE, suggesting obstacles in accessing treatment and specialist care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 107639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121125001408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To describe access challenges, barriers to antiseizure medications (ASMs), and impact of ASM formulary policies for patients with epilepsy (PWE).
Methods
Observational study of de-identified claims from an all-payer claims database (2014–2021) and a formulary/payer policy database. Adults prescribed ≥ 1 ASM following initial epilepsy diagnosis, with continuous medical/pharmacy benefits, were included. Demographic characteristics, proximity to/use of a neurology health care professional (HCP), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs were assessed.
Results
In total, 35,351, 33,339, and 24,722 PWE with commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance, respectively, were included. The Medicare group was older, had a higher comorbidity index score, more males, and fewer non-White and Hispanic individuals versus other groups. Most (> 58 %) commercially-insured PWE had coverage to all six first-generation ASMs examined, six to 12 second-generation ASMs, and all four third-generation ASMs; coverage rates were higher for Medicaid while data for Medicare were incomplete. Most commercial and Medicaid PWE had no access requirements to first-generation ASMs; approximately two-thirds and half of patients had access requirements for second- and third-generation ASMs, respectively. Although > 90 % of PWE used a neurology HCP during follow-up, only about one-third lived within proximity. Of PWE with formulary data (N = 77,787), > 80 % and < 8.0 % were prescribed second- and third-generation ASMs, respectively. There were no clear patterns in epilepsy-related HCRU/cost.
Conclusions
Data revealed difficulties in neurologist access and predominant use of second-generation ASMs, despite access restrictions for many PWE, suggesting obstacles in accessing treatment and specialist care.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.