Halvor Kjærås , Henrik Baktoft , Ana T. Silva , Karl Øystein Gjelland , Finn Økland , Mohammadreza Maddahi , Ismail Albayrak , Leif Lia , Robert M. Boes , Torbjørn Forseth
{"title":"Full scale performance evaluation of a partial-depth floating fish guidance bar rack","authors":"Halvor Kjærås , Henrik Baktoft , Ana T. Silva , Karl Øystein Gjelland , Finn Økland , Mohammadreza Maddahi , Ismail Albayrak , Leif Lia , Robert M. Boes , Torbjørn Forseth","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Migratory fish are commonly hampered or harmed by Hydropower plants (HPP). To mitigate these impacts, protective and guidance structures have been developed. Modified Bar Rack (MBR) systems, tested under laboratorial conditions, have emerged as promising structures to guide migratory fish past HPP intakes. We evaluated the downstream passage and guiding efficiency of a partial depth floating MBR (89 m long x 1,5 m deep, 50 mm bar spacing) at the River Mandal, Norway. Passage efficiency and behavioural responses were examined by tracking 118 Atlantic salmon smolts with 2D and 3D telemetry. Flow dynamics and behavioural observations were combined to relate hydrodynamic conditions to guidance efficiency.</div><div>The installation of the MBR system, combined with a flow reduction at the HPP (to 50 % of the river flow), resulted in a downstream passage efficiency of 72.5 %, representing a 22 percentage point increase compared to predictions with flow reduction alone. Success was limited by the partial-depth design, as some smolts passed beneath the rack. Of the 56 tracked smolts that interacted with the MBR (some descended and passed under), 67 % were guided. Based on smolt depth distribution and behavioural responses, guiding efficiency could be approximated at 76 %, almost matching laboratory results. The relatively high guidance was likely due to the sweeping velocity created by the design of the MBR, that also prevented rack clogging.</div><div>This study provides support for the concept of guiding fish into a migration corridor using an MBR system and presents the first full-scale evaluation of a MBR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 107778"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500268X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Migratory fish are commonly hampered or harmed by Hydropower plants (HPP). To mitigate these impacts, protective and guidance structures have been developed. Modified Bar Rack (MBR) systems, tested under laboratorial conditions, have emerged as promising structures to guide migratory fish past HPP intakes. We evaluated the downstream passage and guiding efficiency of a partial depth floating MBR (89 m long x 1,5 m deep, 50 mm bar spacing) at the River Mandal, Norway. Passage efficiency and behavioural responses were examined by tracking 118 Atlantic salmon smolts with 2D and 3D telemetry. Flow dynamics and behavioural observations were combined to relate hydrodynamic conditions to guidance efficiency.
The installation of the MBR system, combined with a flow reduction at the HPP (to 50 % of the river flow), resulted in a downstream passage efficiency of 72.5 %, representing a 22 percentage point increase compared to predictions with flow reduction alone. Success was limited by the partial-depth design, as some smolts passed beneath the rack. Of the 56 tracked smolts that interacted with the MBR (some descended and passed under), 67 % were guided. Based on smolt depth distribution and behavioural responses, guiding efficiency could be approximated at 76 %, almost matching laboratory results. The relatively high guidance was likely due to the sweeping velocity created by the design of the MBR, that also prevented rack clogging.
This study provides support for the concept of guiding fish into a migration corridor using an MBR system and presents the first full-scale evaluation of a MBR.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.