Interventions to promote resilience in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zhengyang Mei , Chenyi Cai , Tingfeng Wang , Yang Yang , Chifong Lam , Yuanzhuo Zhang , Wen Zhao , Yu Shi , Shulai Luo , Shi Luo
{"title":"Interventions to promote resilience in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Zhengyang Mei ,&nbsp;Chenyi Cai ,&nbsp;Tingfeng Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Yang ,&nbsp;Chifong Lam ,&nbsp;Yuanzhuo Zhang ,&nbsp;Wen Zhao ,&nbsp;Yu Shi ,&nbsp;Shulai Luo ,&nbsp;Shi Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Stressors can significantly threaten the physical and mental health of children and adolescents. While it has been demonstrated that fostering resilience to cope effectively with stressors benefits children and adolescents, research on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials were identified through searches of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and APA PsycINFO electronic databases. Additionally, Google Scholar and the reference lists of studies with similar designs were manually searched. Two independent researchers evaluated the risk of bias in the included trials using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. A narrative synthesis of the included trials was conducted, with a focus on the adequacy of intervention reporting, implementation parameters, and resilience factors of interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review included 68 randomized controlled trials involving 16,623 participants, among which 30 were included in the meta-analyses. Four types of interventions to promote resilience were identified, with three showing small to moderate effects in improving stress coping abilities in children and adolescents and one not demonstrating any efficacy in this regard. The certainty of evidence for resilience ranged from moderate to very low based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review's findings support the positive effects of established interventions—specifically resilience-based, mindfulness-based, and sport-based approaches—in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities. Interventions to promote resilience may represent a promising complementary approach to help children and adolescents cope effectively with stressors. However, future research must establish their clinical effectiveness, particularly among those with mental health conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"96 ","pages":"Pages 295-306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stressors can significantly threaten the physical and mental health of children and adolescents. While it has been demonstrated that fostering resilience to cope effectively with stressors benefits children and adolescents, research on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience remains limited.

Objective

This study aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Methods

This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials were identified through searches of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and APA PsycINFO electronic databases. Additionally, Google Scholar and the reference lists of studies with similar designs were manually searched. Two independent researchers evaluated the risk of bias in the included trials using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. A narrative synthesis of the included trials was conducted, with a focus on the adequacy of intervention reporting, implementation parameters, and resilience factors of interventions.

Results

The review included 68 randomized controlled trials involving 16,623 participants, among which 30 were included in the meta-analyses. Four types of interventions to promote resilience were identified, with three showing small to moderate effects in improving stress coping abilities in children and adolescents and one not demonstrating any efficacy in this regard. The certainty of evidence for resilience ranged from moderate to very low based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations ratings.

Conclusions

The review's findings support the positive effects of established interventions—specifically resilience-based, mindfulness-based, and sport-based approaches—in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities. Interventions to promote resilience may represent a promising complementary approach to help children and adolescents cope effectively with stressors. However, future research must establish their clinical effectiveness, particularly among those with mental health conditions.
促进儿童和青少年恢复力的干预措施:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
应激源对儿童和青少年的身心健康构成严重威胁。虽然已经证明,培养有效应对压力源的弹性有利于儿童和青少年,但对促进弹性的干预措施的有效性的研究仍然有限。目的综合随机对照试验的证据,探讨心理弹性干预对儿童和青少年应对压力能力的影响。设计随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。方法本研究遵循2020年系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。通过检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、EBSCOhost和APA PsycINFO电子数据库确定符合条件的随机对照试验。此外,手动检索谷歌Scholar和类似设计的研究参考文献列表。两名独立研究人员使用改进的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具评估纳入试验的偏倚风险。对纳入的试验进行叙事综合,重点关注干预报告的充分性、实施参数和干预措施的恢复力因素。结果纳入68项随机对照试验,共纳入16623名受试者,其中30项纳入meta分析。研究确定了四种促进心理弹性的干预措施,其中三种在提高儿童和青少年的压力应对能力方面显示出小到中等的效果,而一种在这方面没有显示出任何效果。根据建议、评估、发展和评估等级的分级,恢复力证据的确定性从中等到非常低。结论:该综述的发现支持了现有干预措施——特别是基于弹性、基于正念和基于运动的方法——在提高儿童和青少年应对压力能力方面的积极作用。促进恢复力的干预措施可能是帮助儿童和青少年有效应对压力源的一种有希望的补充方法。然而,未来的研究必须确定它们的临床有效性,特别是对那些有精神健康状况的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信