Zhengyang Mei , Chenyi Cai , Tingfeng Wang , Yang Yang , Chifong Lam , Yuanzhuo Zhang , Wen Zhao , Yu Shi , Shulai Luo , Shi Luo
{"title":"Interventions to promote resilience in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Zhengyang Mei , Chenyi Cai , Tingfeng Wang , Yang Yang , Chifong Lam , Yuanzhuo Zhang , Wen Zhao , Yu Shi , Shulai Luo , Shi Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Stressors can significantly threaten the physical and mental health of children and adolescents. While it has been demonstrated that fostering resilience to cope effectively with stressors benefits children and adolescents, research on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials were identified through searches of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and APA PsycINFO electronic databases. Additionally, Google Scholar and the reference lists of studies with similar designs were manually searched. Two independent researchers evaluated the risk of bias in the included trials using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. A narrative synthesis of the included trials was conducted, with a focus on the adequacy of intervention reporting, implementation parameters, and resilience factors of interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review included 68 randomized controlled trials involving 16,623 participants, among which 30 were included in the meta-analyses. Four types of interventions to promote resilience were identified, with three showing small to moderate effects in improving stress coping abilities in children and adolescents and one not demonstrating any efficacy in this regard. The certainty of evidence for resilience ranged from moderate to very low based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review's findings support the positive effects of established interventions—specifically resilience-based, mindfulness-based, and sport-based approaches—in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities. Interventions to promote resilience may represent a promising complementary approach to help children and adolescents cope effectively with stressors. However, future research must establish their clinical effectiveness, particularly among those with mental health conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"96 ","pages":"Pages 295-306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Stressors can significantly threaten the physical and mental health of children and adolescents. While it has been demonstrated that fostering resilience to cope effectively with stressors benefits children and adolescents, research on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience remains limited.
Objective
This study aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of interventions to promote resilience in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities.
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Methods
This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials were identified through searches of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and APA PsycINFO electronic databases. Additionally, Google Scholar and the reference lists of studies with similar designs were manually searched. Two independent researchers evaluated the risk of bias in the included trials using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. A narrative synthesis of the included trials was conducted, with a focus on the adequacy of intervention reporting, implementation parameters, and resilience factors of interventions.
Results
The review included 68 randomized controlled trials involving 16,623 participants, among which 30 were included in the meta-analyses. Four types of interventions to promote resilience were identified, with three showing small to moderate effects in improving stress coping abilities in children and adolescents and one not demonstrating any efficacy in this regard. The certainty of evidence for resilience ranged from moderate to very low based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations ratings.
Conclusions
The review's findings support the positive effects of established interventions—specifically resilience-based, mindfulness-based, and sport-based approaches—in enhancing child and adolescent stress coping abilities. Interventions to promote resilience may represent a promising complementary approach to help children and adolescents cope effectively with stressors. However, future research must establish their clinical effectiveness, particularly among those with mental health conditions.
应激源对儿童和青少年的身心健康构成严重威胁。虽然已经证明,培养有效应对压力源的弹性有利于儿童和青少年,但对促进弹性的干预措施的有效性的研究仍然有限。目的综合随机对照试验的证据,探讨心理弹性干预对儿童和青少年应对压力能力的影响。设计随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。方法本研究遵循2020年系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。通过检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、EBSCOhost和APA PsycINFO电子数据库确定符合条件的随机对照试验。此外,手动检索谷歌Scholar和类似设计的研究参考文献列表。两名独立研究人员使用改进的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具评估纳入试验的偏倚风险。对纳入的试验进行叙事综合,重点关注干预报告的充分性、实施参数和干预措施的恢复力因素。结果纳入68项随机对照试验,共纳入16623名受试者,其中30项纳入meta分析。研究确定了四种促进心理弹性的干预措施,其中三种在提高儿童和青少年的压力应对能力方面显示出小到中等的效果,而一种在这方面没有显示出任何效果。根据建议、评估、发展和评估等级的分级,恢复力证据的确定性从中等到非常低。结论:该综述的发现支持了现有干预措施——特别是基于弹性、基于正念和基于运动的方法——在提高儿童和青少年应对压力能力方面的积极作用。促进恢复力的干预措施可能是帮助儿童和青少年有效应对压力源的一种有希望的补充方法。然而,未来的研究必须确定它们的临床有效性,特别是对那些有精神健康状况的人。
期刊介绍:
General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.