The multidimensional impact mechanism of treatment convenience, threat assessment, and coping evaluation on medication adherence in pediatric epilepsy patients

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Chunsong Yang , Rui Huang , Botao Wang , Jianhua Zhang , Lingli Zhang
{"title":"The multidimensional impact mechanism of treatment convenience, threat assessment, and coping evaluation on medication adherence in pediatric epilepsy patients","authors":"Chunsong Yang ,&nbsp;Rui Huang ,&nbsp;Botao Wang ,&nbsp;Jianhua Zhang ,&nbsp;Lingli Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study constructs a multidimensional impact mechanism model of “treatment convenience → threat assessment → coping evaluation → medication adherence,” systematically revealing the various factors affecting medication adherence in pediatric epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study selected pediatric epilepsy patients and their caregivers from three institutions: West China Second University Hospital (Jinjiang and West China campuses) and Sichuan Provincial Children’s Hospital. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey. Based on Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), a Structural Equation Model (SEM) was constructed to verify the relationships among treatment convenience, threat assessment, coping evaluation, and medication adherence, test the related theoretical hypotheses, and further analyze the mediating roles of threat assessment and coping evaluation in the relationship between treatment convenience and medication adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 874 patients were included, with an average age of 8.85 ± 3.98 years. Among the different types of epilepsy, focal/partial seizures were the most common, accounting for 47.7 % (417 cases). The medication adherence score was 3.275 ± 1.264, the treatment convenience score was 26.783 ± 6.724, the threat assessment score was 42.013 ± 10.817, and the coping evaluation score was 34.719 ± 8.651. Significant positive correlations were found between all three scores. The reliability and validity of all scales were good. Path analysis revealed that treatment convenience, threat assessment, and coping evaluation all had a significant positive impact on medication adherence. Mediating effect analysis showed that the effect of treatment convenience on medication adherence was both direct and indirect, mediated by threat assessment and coping evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Treatment convenience affects medication adherence through both direct and mediating pathways, while threat assessment and coping evaluation have profound impacts on adherence at both cognitive and behavioral levels. Future clinical practice should focus on optimizing external conditions (such as improving treatment convenience) and internal psychological interventions (such as appropriately guiding threat perception and enhancing coping strategies) to improve patient adherence from multiple dimensions, providing scientific support for the long-term management of pediatric epilepsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 110669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study constructs a multidimensional impact mechanism model of “treatment convenience → threat assessment → coping evaluation → medication adherence,” systematically revealing the various factors affecting medication adherence in pediatric epilepsy.

Methods

This cross-sectional study selected pediatric epilepsy patients and their caregivers from three institutions: West China Second University Hospital (Jinjiang and West China campuses) and Sichuan Provincial Children’s Hospital. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey. Based on Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), a Structural Equation Model (SEM) was constructed to verify the relationships among treatment convenience, threat assessment, coping evaluation, and medication adherence, test the related theoretical hypotheses, and further analyze the mediating roles of threat assessment and coping evaluation in the relationship between treatment convenience and medication adherence.

Results

A total of 874 patients were included, with an average age of 8.85 ± 3.98 years. Among the different types of epilepsy, focal/partial seizures were the most common, accounting for 47.7 % (417 cases). The medication adherence score was 3.275 ± 1.264, the treatment convenience score was 26.783 ± 6.724, the threat assessment score was 42.013 ± 10.817, and the coping evaluation score was 34.719 ± 8.651. Significant positive correlations were found between all three scores. The reliability and validity of all scales were good. Path analysis revealed that treatment convenience, threat assessment, and coping evaluation all had a significant positive impact on medication adherence. Mediating effect analysis showed that the effect of treatment convenience on medication adherence was both direct and indirect, mediated by threat assessment and coping evaluation.

Conclusion

Treatment convenience affects medication adherence through both direct and mediating pathways, while threat assessment and coping evaluation have profound impacts on adherence at both cognitive and behavioral levels. Future clinical practice should focus on optimizing external conditions (such as improving treatment convenience) and internal psychological interventions (such as appropriately guiding threat perception and enhancing coping strategies) to improve patient adherence from multiple dimensions, providing scientific support for the long-term management of pediatric epilepsy.
治疗便捷性、威胁评价和应对评价对小儿癫痫患者服药依从性的多维影响机制
目的构建“治疗便捷性→威胁评价→应对评价→服药依从性”的多维影响机制模型,系统揭示影响小儿癫痫服药依从性的各种因素。方法横断面研究选择华西第二医院(锦江校区和华西校区)和四川省儿童医院的儿童癫痫患者及其护理人员。通过问卷调查收集数据。基于保护动机理论(PMT),构建结构方程模型(SEM),验证治疗便利性、威胁评估、应对评估和药物依从性之间的关系,检验相关理论假设,进一步分析威胁评估和应对评估在治疗便利性和药物依从性关系中的中介作用。结果共纳入874例患者,平均年龄8.85±3.98岁。在不同类型的癫痫中,局灶性/部分性癫痫发作最常见,占47.7%(417例)。用药依从性评分为3.275±1.264,治疗便捷性评分为26.783±6.724,威胁评估评分为42.013±10.817,应对评估评分为34.719±8.651。三个分数之间存在显著的正相关。各量表的信度和效度均较好。通径分析显示,治疗便捷性、威胁评估和应对评估均对药物依从性有显著的正向影响。中介效应分析表明,治疗便捷性对药物依从性的影响有直接和间接的作用,其中有威胁评价和应对评价的中介作用。结论治疗便捷性通过直接途径和中介途径影响药物依从性,而威胁评估和应对评估在认知和行为层面对药物依从性均有影响。未来的临床实践应注重优化外部条件(如提高治疗便利性)和内部心理干预(如适当引导威胁认知和加强应对策略),从多个维度提高患者的依从性,为儿童癫痫的长期管理提供科学支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信