Insights into patellofemoral kinematics and cartilage stresses following paediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An exploratory in silico study
Ayda Karimi Dastgerdi , Amir Esrafilian , Christopher P. Carty , Alireza Y. Bavil , Rami K. Korhonen , Ivan Astori , Wayne Hall , David John Saxby
{"title":"Insights into patellofemoral kinematics and cartilage stresses following paediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An exploratory in silico study","authors":"Ayda Karimi Dastgerdi , Amir Esrafilian , Christopher P. Carty , Alireza Y. Bavil , Rami K. Korhonen , Ivan Astori , Wayne Hall , David John Saxby","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are prevalent among physically active paediatric and adolescent populations, often necessitating ACL-reconstruction (ACLR) to restore passive knee stability. Complications in the patellofemoral joint (PFJ), such as pain and early osteoarthritis, are common following ACLR. Despite these concerns, post-ACLR PFJ biomechanics remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to explore the influence of ACLR surgical parameters and subject-specific factors (i.e., knee phenotype, neuromusculoskeletal function) on PFJ biomechanics using an in-silico neuromusculoskeletal (NMSK)-finite element (FE) modeling approach. Three subject-specific NMSK-FE models were used to simulate the effects of four surgical parameters (graft type, size, location, and pre-tension) on PFJ biomechanics (kinematics and cartilage stresses) during walking. Additionally, ACL-deficient (ACLD) models were included to compare PFJ biomechanics in the absence of ACLR. Each surgical combination and ACLD were compared to a corresponding intact knee. Normalized root-mean-square error (nRMSE) quantified deviations in PFJ biomechanics among ACLR, ACLD, and intact knees. PFJ biomechanics in ACLD knees consistently deviated more from intact knees than those in ACLR models, underscoring the restorative effect of reconstruction. Most ACLR surgical combinations restored PFJ kinematics and stress to near intact levels (nRMSE < 10 %) for two participants. In contrast, ∼80.2 % of combinations resulted in substantial deviations (nRMSE > 10 %) for one participant, potentially increasing the risk of cartilage degeneration. Subject-specific factors influenced PFJ outcomes but showed no consistent trends. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating individualized geometry and loading in simulations to optimize ACLR for biomechanical outcomes. This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of surgical parameter effects on paediatric PFJ biomechanics following ACLR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are prevalent among physically active paediatric and adolescent populations, often necessitating ACL-reconstruction (ACLR) to restore passive knee stability. Complications in the patellofemoral joint (PFJ), such as pain and early osteoarthritis, are common following ACLR. Despite these concerns, post-ACLR PFJ biomechanics remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to explore the influence of ACLR surgical parameters and subject-specific factors (i.e., knee phenotype, neuromusculoskeletal function) on PFJ biomechanics using an in-silico neuromusculoskeletal (NMSK)-finite element (FE) modeling approach. Three subject-specific NMSK-FE models were used to simulate the effects of four surgical parameters (graft type, size, location, and pre-tension) on PFJ biomechanics (kinematics and cartilage stresses) during walking. Additionally, ACL-deficient (ACLD) models were included to compare PFJ biomechanics in the absence of ACLR. Each surgical combination and ACLD were compared to a corresponding intact knee. Normalized root-mean-square error (nRMSE) quantified deviations in PFJ biomechanics among ACLR, ACLD, and intact knees. PFJ biomechanics in ACLD knees consistently deviated more from intact knees than those in ACLR models, underscoring the restorative effect of reconstruction. Most ACLR surgical combinations restored PFJ kinematics and stress to near intact levels (nRMSE < 10 %) for two participants. In contrast, ∼80.2 % of combinations resulted in substantial deviations (nRMSE > 10 %) for one participant, potentially increasing the risk of cartilage degeneration. Subject-specific factors influenced PFJ outcomes but showed no consistent trends. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating individualized geometry and loading in simulations to optimize ACLR for biomechanical outcomes. This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of surgical parameter effects on paediatric PFJ biomechanics following ACLR.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.