Let's kick that habit: An experiment of five habit-change strategies on habits and symptoms among adults with sleep problems

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Laurel D. Sarfan, Anne E. Milner, Sondra Tiab, Diya Tuli, Allison G. Harvey
{"title":"Let's kick that habit: An experiment of five habit-change strategies on habits and symptoms among adults with sleep problems","authors":"Laurel D. Sarfan,&nbsp;Anne E. Milner,&nbsp;Sondra Tiab,&nbsp;Diya Tuli,&nbsp;Allison G. Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Habits are underexplored in research on evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs). We recruited participants (<em>N</em> = 286) with sleep problems via Mechanical Turk for an experiment to shift wake-up habits, a key target of EBPTs for sleep problems. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (i.e., psychoeducation about healthy wake-up habits) or one of five active habit-change strategies: substitution with RISE UP, awareness training, vigilant monitoring, implementation intentions, and values. New and old wake-up habit strength, sleep disruption, and sleep-related impairment were assessed at baseline, six-week follow-up, and three-month follow-up. Aim 1 tested within- and between-condition change in the outcomes. Aim 2 tested whether change in wake-up habit strength predicted improvements in sleep disruption and sleep-related impairment. Except the values condition, all habit-change strategies and the control were significantly associated with within-condition improvements at 6-week follow-up and 3-month follow-up in: new habit strength (<em>d</em> = 0.81 to 1.68), old habit strength (<em>d</em> = −0.63 to −1.04), sleep disruption (<em>d</em> = −0.97 to −1.98), and sleep-related impairment (<em>d</em> = −0.60 to −1.65). Few differences between conditions emerged. Across conditions, more than 50% of participants met thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement, except the values condition at 3-month follow-up. Change in new and old habit strength significantly predicted change in sleep problems. Key limitations included: an exclusively online study design, dropout rate, and sample collected via Mechanical Turk using self-report measures without formal assessment of sleep diagnoses. Future research should investigate the clinical presentations and EBPT skills for which these habit-change strategies are most effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791625000333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Habits are underexplored in research on evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs). We recruited participants (N = 286) with sleep problems via Mechanical Turk for an experiment to shift wake-up habits, a key target of EBPTs for sleep problems. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (i.e., psychoeducation about healthy wake-up habits) or one of five active habit-change strategies: substitution with RISE UP, awareness training, vigilant monitoring, implementation intentions, and values. New and old wake-up habit strength, sleep disruption, and sleep-related impairment were assessed at baseline, six-week follow-up, and three-month follow-up. Aim 1 tested within- and between-condition change in the outcomes. Aim 2 tested whether change in wake-up habit strength predicted improvements in sleep disruption and sleep-related impairment. Except the values condition, all habit-change strategies and the control were significantly associated with within-condition improvements at 6-week follow-up and 3-month follow-up in: new habit strength (d = 0.81 to 1.68), old habit strength (d = −0.63 to −1.04), sleep disruption (d = −0.97 to −1.98), and sleep-related impairment (d = −0.60 to −1.65). Few differences between conditions emerged. Across conditions, more than 50% of participants met thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement, except the values condition at 3-month follow-up. Change in new and old habit strength significantly predicted change in sleep problems. Key limitations included: an exclusively online study design, dropout rate, and sample collected via Mechanical Turk using self-report measures without formal assessment of sleep diagnoses. Future research should investigate the clinical presentations and EBPT skills for which these habit-change strategies are most effective.
让我们戒除这个习惯:一项针对有睡眠问题的成年人的习惯和症状的五种习惯改变策略的实验
习惯在循证心理治疗(EBPTs)的研究中尚未得到充分的探索。我们通过Mechanical Turk招募了有睡眠问题的参与者(N = 286),进行了一项改变唤醒习惯的实验,这是ebpt治疗睡眠问题的关键目标。参与者被随机分配到对照组(即,关于健康唤醒习惯的心理教育)或五种积极的习惯改变策略中的一种:用RISE UP替代、意识训练、警惕监测、实施意图和价值观。在基线、6周随访和3个月随访时评估新旧唤醒习惯强度、睡眠中断和睡眠相关损伤。目的1测试结果的条件内和条件间变化。目的2测试了唤醒习惯强度的改变是否能预测睡眠中断和睡眠相关障碍的改善。除价值观条件外,所有习惯改变策略和对照组在6周随访和3个月随访时与条件内改善显著相关:新习惯强度(d = 0.81至1.68)、旧习惯强度(d = - 0.63至- 1.04)、睡眠中断(d = - 0.97至- 1.98)和睡眠相关障碍(d = - 0.60至- 1.65)。不同条件之间几乎没有差异。在所有条件下,超过50%的参与者达到了临床有意义改善的阈值,除了3个月随访时的价值条件。新旧习惯强度的变化显著预测了睡眠问题的变化。主要的限制包括:一个专门的在线研究设计,辍学率,以及通过Mechanical Turk使用自我报告测量收集的样本,没有对睡眠诊断进行正式评估。未来的研究应该调查临床表现和EBPT技能,这些习惯改变策略是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信