Laurel D. Sarfan, Anne E. Milner, Sondra Tiab, Diya Tuli, Allison G. Harvey
{"title":"Let's kick that habit: An experiment of five habit-change strategies on habits and symptoms among adults with sleep problems","authors":"Laurel D. Sarfan, Anne E. Milner, Sondra Tiab, Diya Tuli, Allison G. Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Habits are underexplored in research on evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs). We recruited participants (<em>N</em> = 286) with sleep problems via Mechanical Turk for an experiment to shift wake-up habits, a key target of EBPTs for sleep problems. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (i.e., psychoeducation about healthy wake-up habits) or one of five active habit-change strategies: substitution with RISE UP, awareness training, vigilant monitoring, implementation intentions, and values. New and old wake-up habit strength, sleep disruption, and sleep-related impairment were assessed at baseline, six-week follow-up, and three-month follow-up. Aim 1 tested within- and between-condition change in the outcomes. Aim 2 tested whether change in wake-up habit strength predicted improvements in sleep disruption and sleep-related impairment. Except the values condition, all habit-change strategies and the control were significantly associated with within-condition improvements at 6-week follow-up and 3-month follow-up in: new habit strength (<em>d</em> = 0.81 to 1.68), old habit strength (<em>d</em> = −0.63 to −1.04), sleep disruption (<em>d</em> = −0.97 to −1.98), and sleep-related impairment (<em>d</em> = −0.60 to −1.65). Few differences between conditions emerged. Across conditions, more than 50% of participants met thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement, except the values condition at 3-month follow-up. Change in new and old habit strength significantly predicted change in sleep problems. Key limitations included: an exclusively online study design, dropout rate, and sample collected via Mechanical Turk using self-report measures without formal assessment of sleep diagnoses. Future research should investigate the clinical presentations and EBPT skills for which these habit-change strategies are most effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791625000333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Habits are underexplored in research on evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs). We recruited participants (N = 286) with sleep problems via Mechanical Turk for an experiment to shift wake-up habits, a key target of EBPTs for sleep problems. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (i.e., psychoeducation about healthy wake-up habits) or one of five active habit-change strategies: substitution with RISE UP, awareness training, vigilant monitoring, implementation intentions, and values. New and old wake-up habit strength, sleep disruption, and sleep-related impairment were assessed at baseline, six-week follow-up, and three-month follow-up. Aim 1 tested within- and between-condition change in the outcomes. Aim 2 tested whether change in wake-up habit strength predicted improvements in sleep disruption and sleep-related impairment. Except the values condition, all habit-change strategies and the control were significantly associated with within-condition improvements at 6-week follow-up and 3-month follow-up in: new habit strength (d = 0.81 to 1.68), old habit strength (d = −0.63 to −1.04), sleep disruption (d = −0.97 to −1.98), and sleep-related impairment (d = −0.60 to −1.65). Few differences between conditions emerged. Across conditions, more than 50% of participants met thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement, except the values condition at 3-month follow-up. Change in new and old habit strength significantly predicted change in sleep problems. Key limitations included: an exclusively online study design, dropout rate, and sample collected via Mechanical Turk using self-report measures without formal assessment of sleep diagnoses. Future research should investigate the clinical presentations and EBPT skills for which these habit-change strategies are most effective.
期刊介绍:
The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.