Community prevalence of at-risk state for bipolar disorder: Validation of the Korean version of Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale-Abbreviated Screen for Patients (BPSS-AS-P)
{"title":"Community prevalence of at-risk state for bipolar disorder: Validation of the Korean version of Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale-Abbreviated Screen for Patients (BPSS-AS-P)","authors":"Junhee Lee , Taeyoung Lee , Christoph U. Correll","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The progression towards early identification and intervention of bipolar disorder (BD) has been dampened by a scarcity of reliable early screening instruments for BD risk. The Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale–Abbreviated Screen for Patients (BPSS-AS-P) is a self-rated questionnaire devised to screen individuals at risk of developing BD but has not been validated in a community-dwelling individuals. The current study aimed to validate its psychometric properties and determine the optimal cut-off in a community sample.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included community-dwelling residents, aged 14–34, who underwent two-phased, semi-structured interviews. Among those, 138 individuals who screened positive on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) participated in the second stage interview by a psychiatrist and completed the BPSS-AS-P. The psychometric properties of the BPSS-AS-P were evaluated, including internal consistency, convergent validity, and optimal cut-offs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-eight individuals (42.0 % of the second stage interviewees or 4.2 % of the total participants) were identified as being at risk of developing BD (BDRisk+). The median (IQR) age was 25 (20–30) and 24 (18–29) years, for the BDRisk+ and BDRisk– individuals. The BPSS-AS-P showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.89). The BPSS-AS-P raw summed total score was significantly positively correlated with BDRisk+ (P = .044), discriminating BDRisk+ from BDRisk– individuals (AUC=.800, P < .001) at a cut-off score= 25.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among community-dwelling participants, prevalence of BDRisk+ individuals was 4.2 %. The BPSS-AS-P, a self-report questionnaire version of the semi-structured interview for identifying BDRisk+ individuals had satisfactory psychometric properties in a community sample. Future studies on the predictive validity of the BPSS-AS-P to predict full-blown BD are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 104669"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825003120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The progression towards early identification and intervention of bipolar disorder (BD) has been dampened by a scarcity of reliable early screening instruments for BD risk. The Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale–Abbreviated Screen for Patients (BPSS-AS-P) is a self-rated questionnaire devised to screen individuals at risk of developing BD but has not been validated in a community-dwelling individuals. The current study aimed to validate its psychometric properties and determine the optimal cut-off in a community sample.
Methods
The study included community-dwelling residents, aged 14–34, who underwent two-phased, semi-structured interviews. Among those, 138 individuals who screened positive on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) participated in the second stage interview by a psychiatrist and completed the BPSS-AS-P. The psychometric properties of the BPSS-AS-P were evaluated, including internal consistency, convergent validity, and optimal cut-offs.
Results
Fifty-eight individuals (42.0 % of the second stage interviewees or 4.2 % of the total participants) were identified as being at risk of developing BD (BDRisk+). The median (IQR) age was 25 (20–30) and 24 (18–29) years, for the BDRisk+ and BDRisk– individuals. The BPSS-AS-P showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.89). The BPSS-AS-P raw summed total score was significantly positively correlated with BDRisk+ (P = .044), discriminating BDRisk+ from BDRisk– individuals (AUC=.800, P < .001) at a cut-off score= 25.
Conclusions
Among community-dwelling participants, prevalence of BDRisk+ individuals was 4.2 %. The BPSS-AS-P, a self-report questionnaire version of the semi-structured interview for identifying BDRisk+ individuals had satisfactory psychometric properties in a community sample. Future studies on the predictive validity of the BPSS-AS-P to predict full-blown BD are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.