Solo Versus Tandem Cycling Performance: The Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts

IF 3
Albert Smit, Julia Boschker, Stephan van der Zwaard, Ina Janssen, Thomas W. J. Janssen, Mathijs J. Hofmijster
{"title":"Solo Versus Tandem Cycling Performance: The Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts","authors":"Albert Smit,&nbsp;Julia Boschker,&nbsp;Stephan van der Zwaard,&nbsp;Ina Janssen,&nbsp;Thomas W. J. Janssen,&nbsp;Mathijs J. Hofmijster","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tandem cycling is a Paralympic discipline where two cyclists share one bicycle and requires synchronization and shared effort. In this study, we investigated how individual performance on a solo bicycle compares to tandem cycling. Twelve trained cyclists, that were unfamiliar with tandem cycling, completed a submaximal cycling test, a 30 s Wingate test, and a 10 min time trial under solo and tandem conditions. Performance metrics included gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output, heart rate, and cadence. The results showed that mean power output during the 10 min time trial was significantly lower on a tandem than on a solo bicycle (257 ± 66 W vs. 282 ± 80 W and <i>p</i> = 0.004), whereas cadence was higher (102.0 ± 7.7 rpm vs. 93.6 ± 4.7 rpm and <i>p</i> = 0.002). Gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output over 30 s, and heart rate over 10 min did not differ significantly between solo and tandem cycling. These findings suggest that although tandem cycling influences cadence and power, it does not reduce efficiency or short-duration maximal performance. Given the differences in power output and cadence, coaches and athletes should carefully interpret solo cycling performance metrics when applied to tandem racing and training, especially in novice tandem cyclists. Future research should investigate the role of power output matching and tandem experience, and further explore the interaction between pilot and stoker to optimize performance outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tandem cycling is a Paralympic discipline where two cyclists share one bicycle and requires synchronization and shared effort. In this study, we investigated how individual performance on a solo bicycle compares to tandem cycling. Twelve trained cyclists, that were unfamiliar with tandem cycling, completed a submaximal cycling test, a 30 s Wingate test, and a 10 min time trial under solo and tandem conditions. Performance metrics included gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output, heart rate, and cadence. The results showed that mean power output during the 10 min time trial was significantly lower on a tandem than on a solo bicycle (257 ± 66 W vs. 282 ± 80 W and p = 0.004), whereas cadence was higher (102.0 ± 7.7 rpm vs. 93.6 ± 4.7 rpm and p = 0.002). Gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output over 30 s, and heart rate over 10 min did not differ significantly between solo and tandem cycling. These findings suggest that although tandem cycling influences cadence and power, it does not reduce efficiency or short-duration maximal performance. Given the differences in power output and cadence, coaches and athletes should carefully interpret solo cycling performance metrics when applied to tandem racing and training, especially in novice tandem cyclists. Future research should investigate the role of power output matching and tandem experience, and further explore the interaction between pilot and stoker to optimize performance outcomes.

Abstract Image

单骑与双人骑的表现:整体不如部分之和
双人自行车是残奥会的一个项目,两名自行车手共用一辆自行车,需要同步和共同努力。在这项研究中,我们调查了个人在单人自行车和双人自行车上的表现。12名不熟悉双人自行车的训练有素的自行车运动员在单人和双人条件下完成了次极限自行车测试、30秒温盖特测试和10分钟计时赛。性能指标包括总效率、最大功率输出、平均功率输出、心率和节奏。结果表明,在10分钟计时赛中,双人自行车的平均功率输出明显低于单人自行车(257±66 W vs 282±80 W, p = 0.004),而节奏更高(102.0±7.7 rpm vs 93.6±4.7 rpm, p = 0.002)。总效率、最大功率输出、30秒以上的平均功率输出和10分钟以上的心率在单人和双人自行车之间没有显著差异。这些发现表明,虽然双人自行车影响节奏和力量,但它不会降低效率或短时间最大表现。考虑到力量输出和节奏的差异,教练和运动员在应用于双人比赛和训练时应该仔细解释单人自行车的表现指标,特别是在新手双人自行车运动员中。未来的研究应进一步探讨功率输出匹配和串联经验的作用,并进一步探讨飞行员和加炉之间的相互作用,以优化性能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信