A Transdisciplinary Framework to Bridge Science–Policy–Development Gaps in Global Land Management Initiatives

IF 6.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Nigussie Haregeweyn, Atsushi Tsunekawa, Ayele Almaw Fenta, Pasquale Borrelli, Panos Panagos, Ermias Aynekulu, Takeshi Abe, Peri Pablo, Simon West
{"title":"A Transdisciplinary Framework to Bridge Science–Policy–Development Gaps in Global Land Management Initiatives","authors":"Nigussie Haregeweyn,&nbsp;Atsushi Tsunekawa,&nbsp;Ayele Almaw Fenta,&nbsp;Pasquale Borrelli,&nbsp;Panos Panagos,&nbsp;Ermias Aynekulu,&nbsp;Takeshi Abe,&nbsp;Peri Pablo,&nbsp;Simon West","doi":"10.1002/gch2.202400261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective implementation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) remains a major challenge worldwide because of its weak integration within the domains of science, policy, and development practice. Based on global analyses of soil erosion risk and the degree of implementation of SLM research, policies, and practices at the country level, we propose a transdisciplinary framework to address soil erosion through SLM. In the analysis, we used indices of the policy–development, science–policy, and science–development interfaces to evaluate the overall science–policy–development interface (SPDI) in 236 countries. Over 190 countries (81%) were found to be currently facing moderate or high risk of increased soil erosion from two or more erosion processes, and 182 countries (77%) were found to have a SPDI level that was lower than their soil erosion risk implying the urgent need for a transdisciplinary framework that supports the implementation of future soil erosion research and development projects. Our proposed transdisciplinary framework comprises seven stages, starting from “shared research framing” and ending with “ex-post evaluation”. The framework’s practical application is discussed in the context of a recent project, emphasizing the need for country-specific studies to develop tailored frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12646,"journal":{"name":"Global Challenges","volume":"9 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gch2.202400261","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gch2.202400261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective implementation of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) remains a major challenge worldwide because of its weak integration within the domains of science, policy, and development practice. Based on global analyses of soil erosion risk and the degree of implementation of SLM research, policies, and practices at the country level, we propose a transdisciplinary framework to address soil erosion through SLM. In the analysis, we used indices of the policy–development, science–policy, and science–development interfaces to evaluate the overall science–policy–development interface (SPDI) in 236 countries. Over 190 countries (81%) were found to be currently facing moderate or high risk of increased soil erosion from two or more erosion processes, and 182 countries (77%) were found to have a SPDI level that was lower than their soil erosion risk implying the urgent need for a transdisciplinary framework that supports the implementation of future soil erosion research and development projects. Our proposed transdisciplinary framework comprises seven stages, starting from “shared research framing” and ending with “ex-post evaluation”. The framework’s practical application is discussed in the context of a recent project, emphasizing the need for country-specific studies to develop tailored frameworks.

Abstract Image

弥合全球土地管理倡议中科学-政策-发展差距的跨学科框架
由于可持续土地管理在科学、政策和发展实践领域的整合能力较弱,因此有效实施可持续土地管理(SLM)仍然是全球面临的一个重大挑战。基于对全球土壤侵蚀风险的分析以及国家层面土壤土壤管理研究、政策和实践的实施程度,我们提出了一个通过土壤土壤管理解决土壤侵蚀的跨学科框架。在分析中,我们使用政策-发展、科学-政策和科学-发展接口指数来评估236个国家的整体科学-政策-发展接口(SPDI)。超过190个国家(81%)目前面临着两种或两种以上侵蚀过程导致土壤侵蚀增加的中度或高风险,182个国家(77%)的SPDI水平低于其土壤侵蚀风险,这意味着迫切需要一个跨学科框架来支持未来土壤侵蚀研究和开发项目的实施。我们提出的跨学科框架包括七个阶段,从“共享研究框架”开始,到“事后评估”结束。在最近一个项目的背景下讨论了该框架的实际应用,强调需要进行针对具体国家的研究,以制定有针对性的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Challenges
Global Challenges MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信