Dye Manufacturing Wastewater Treatment by Adsorption and Fenton Processes: Performance Evaluation and Cost Analysis

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yasemin Kayhan, Deniz İzlen Çifçi, Elçin Güneş, Yalçın Güneş
{"title":"Dye Manufacturing Wastewater Treatment by Adsorption and Fenton Processes: Performance Evaluation and Cost Analysis","authors":"Yasemin Kayhan,&nbsp;Deniz İzlen Çifçi,&nbsp;Elçin Güneş,&nbsp;Yalçın Güneş","doi":"10.1002/clen.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The dye manufacturing industry generates substantial volumes of wastewater that contains color, metals, and various toxic chemicals depending on the specific dyes produced. Effective treatment of this complex wastewater is of great importance to ensure compliance with discharge regulations and protect aquatic ecosystems. In this study, the treatability of wastewater samples taken from the dye manufacturing industry at two different times was investigated using adsorption and Fenton oxidation processes. Treatment performance and cost-effectiveness were assessed by using different pH values and activated carbon dosages in the adsorption process, and different Fe<sup>2+</sup> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> dosages in the Fenton process. The optimum removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and color in the adsorption process was achieved at pH 5, and at 20 g L<sup>−1</sup> activated carbon, COD and color removal were achieved at above 64.2% and 95%, respectively. In Fenton oxidation studies, a COD removal rate of 56.6% was achieved for wastewater 1 at 3000 mg L<sup>−1</sup> Fe<sup>2+</sup> and 6000 mg L<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Similarly, a 60.3% COD removal rate was achieved at 4000 mg L<sup>−1</sup> Fe<sup>2+</sup> and 6000 mg L<sup>−1</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in wastewater 2. In the Fenton process, the color removal rate for both wastewaters approached approximately 98%–99%. The cost of wastewater treatment for dye manufacturing wastewater was calculated to be $10.58–15.53 m<sup>−3</sup> in the adsorption process and $20.57–22.89 m<sup>−3</sup> in the Fenton oxidation process. Overall, the findings indicate that both adsorption and Fenton processes are effective treatment alternatives for dye manufacturing wastewater, providing significant reductions in COD and color.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"53 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dye manufacturing industry generates substantial volumes of wastewater that contains color, metals, and various toxic chemicals depending on the specific dyes produced. Effective treatment of this complex wastewater is of great importance to ensure compliance with discharge regulations and protect aquatic ecosystems. In this study, the treatability of wastewater samples taken from the dye manufacturing industry at two different times was investigated using adsorption and Fenton oxidation processes. Treatment performance and cost-effectiveness were assessed by using different pH values and activated carbon dosages in the adsorption process, and different Fe2+ and H2O2 dosages in the Fenton process. The optimum removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and color in the adsorption process was achieved at pH 5, and at 20 g L−1 activated carbon, COD and color removal were achieved at above 64.2% and 95%, respectively. In Fenton oxidation studies, a COD removal rate of 56.6% was achieved for wastewater 1 at 3000 mg L−1 Fe2+ and 6000 mg L−1 H2O2. Similarly, a 60.3% COD removal rate was achieved at 4000 mg L−1 Fe2+ and 6000 mg L−1 H2O2 in wastewater 2. In the Fenton process, the color removal rate for both wastewaters approached approximately 98%–99%. The cost of wastewater treatment for dye manufacturing wastewater was calculated to be $10.58–15.53 m−3 in the adsorption process and $20.57–22.89 m−3 in the Fenton oxidation process. Overall, the findings indicate that both adsorption and Fenton processes are effective treatment alternatives for dye manufacturing wastewater, providing significant reductions in COD and color.

Abstract Image

吸附法和Fenton法处理染料生产废水:性能评价和成本分析
染料制造业产生大量的废水,其中含有颜色、金属和各种有毒化学物质,这取决于所生产的特定染料。对这种复杂的废水进行有效处理,对确保其符合排放法规和保护水生生态系统具有重要意义。在本研究中,采用吸附法和Fenton氧化法研究了染料制造业在两个不同时间采集的废水样品的可处理性。通过吸附过程中不同pH值和活性炭投加量,Fenton过程中不同Fe2+和H2O2投加量对处理效果和成本效益进行评价。在pH为5的条件下,吸附过程中化学需氧量(COD)和颜色的去除率达到最佳,在20 g L−1活性炭条件下,COD和颜色的去除率分别达到64.2%和95%以上。在Fenton氧化研究中,废水1在3000 mg L−1 Fe2+和6000 mg L−1 H2O2条件下COD去除率达到56.6%。同样,废水中Fe2+浓度为4000 mg L−1,H2O2浓度为6000 mg L−1,COD去除率为60.3%。在Fenton工艺中,两种废水的去除率均接近98%-99%。染料生产废水的吸附处理成本为10.58 ~ 15.53 m−3,Fenton氧化处理成本为20.57 ~ 22.89 m−3。总体而言,研究结果表明,吸附和Fenton工艺都是染料生产废水的有效处理方案,可显著降低COD和颜色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clean-soil Air Water
Clean-soil Air Water 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications. Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信