Effects of grazing management practices, topographic position, and land cover type on soil organic carbon fractions in semi-arid rangelands of Kenya

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. N. Gitau, S. M. Mureithi, S. Mwendwa, R. N. Onwonga, J. S. Mbau, J. Chepkemoi, S. Kiama
{"title":"Effects of grazing management practices, topographic position, and land cover type on soil organic carbon fractions in semi-arid rangelands of Kenya","authors":"A. N. Gitau,&nbsp;S. M. Mureithi,&nbsp;S. Mwendwa,&nbsp;R. N. Onwonga,&nbsp;J. S. Mbau,&nbsp;J. Chepkemoi,&nbsp;S. Kiama","doi":"10.1186/s13021-025-00319-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study evaluated the effects of grazing management practices, topographic position, and land cover types on mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya. Research was conducted at Mpala Research Centre (controlled grazing) and Ilmotiok Community Group Ranch (continuous grazing) in Laikipia County. A factorial experimental design with a split-plot arrangement was used in this study. Grazing management practices (controlled and continuous grazing) and topographic positions (midslope, foot slope, and bottomland) were assigned to the main plots, while land cover types (bare ground, grass patches, and tree mosaics) were designated as subplots. Soil samples were collected at 10 cm intervals, 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm depth for MAOC and POC analysis. Data analysis was done using R software, where nonparametric tests were done when the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were violated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Controlled grazing resulted in higher MAOC (0.361%) and POC (0.683%) compared to continuous grazing (0.352% and 0.548%, respectively), indicating an increase of 2.56% in MAOC and 24.64% in POC under controlled grazing. This can largely be attributed to improved vegetation recovery, especially in midslope areas. The highest MAOC (0.367%) was found in the bottomland, likely due to reduced erosion and improved water retention. The midslope and foot slope positions had lower MAOC means of 0.358% and 0.344%, respectively. Depth analysis showed peak MAOC at 20 cm (0.390%), with controlled grazing resulting in better carbon retention at 30 cm. Similarly, controlled grazing yielded a mean POC of 0.683% versus 0.548% for continuous grazing, with bottomland having the highest POC of 0.754%. A Kruskal‒Wallis tests showed significant differences in MAOC and POC across land cover types (χ² = 42.701, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 for MAOC, and χ² = 83.53, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 for POC), with tree mosaics and bare land contributing most to POC and MAOC, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings highlight the beneficial role of controlled grazing and diverse land cover in enhancing soil carbon storage. To promote sustainable rangeland management, it is recommended that rangeland managers adopt controlled grazing practices and allow diverse land cover types, such as tree mosaics, to increase carbon sequestration and ecosystem resilience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-025-00319-y","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-025-00319-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study evaluated the effects of grazing management practices, topographic position, and land cover types on mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in a semi-arid rangeland of Kenya. Research was conducted at Mpala Research Centre (controlled grazing) and Ilmotiok Community Group Ranch (continuous grazing) in Laikipia County. A factorial experimental design with a split-plot arrangement was used in this study. Grazing management practices (controlled and continuous grazing) and topographic positions (midslope, foot slope, and bottomland) were assigned to the main plots, while land cover types (bare ground, grass patches, and tree mosaics) were designated as subplots. Soil samples were collected at 10 cm intervals, 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm depth for MAOC and POC analysis. Data analysis was done using R software, where nonparametric tests were done when the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were violated.

Results

Controlled grazing resulted in higher MAOC (0.361%) and POC (0.683%) compared to continuous grazing (0.352% and 0.548%, respectively), indicating an increase of 2.56% in MAOC and 24.64% in POC under controlled grazing. This can largely be attributed to improved vegetation recovery, especially in midslope areas. The highest MAOC (0.367%) was found in the bottomland, likely due to reduced erosion and improved water retention. The midslope and foot slope positions had lower MAOC means of 0.358% and 0.344%, respectively. Depth analysis showed peak MAOC at 20 cm (0.390%), with controlled grazing resulting in better carbon retention at 30 cm. Similarly, controlled grazing yielded a mean POC of 0.683% versus 0.548% for continuous grazing, with bottomland having the highest POC of 0.754%. A Kruskal‒Wallis tests showed significant differences in MAOC and POC across land cover types (χ² = 42.701, p < 0.001 for MAOC, and χ² = 83.53, p < 0.001 for POC), with tree mosaics and bare land contributing most to POC and MAOC, respectively.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the beneficial role of controlled grazing and diverse land cover in enhancing soil carbon storage. To promote sustainable rangeland management, it is recommended that rangeland managers adopt controlled grazing practices and allow diverse land cover types, such as tree mosaics, to increase carbon sequestration and ecosystem resilience.

放牧管理方式、地形位置和土地覆盖类型对肯尼亚半干旱草原土壤有机碳组分的影响
本研究评估了放牧管理方式、地形位置和土地覆盖类型对肯尼亚半干旱草原矿物相关有机碳(MAOC)和颗粒有机碳(POC)的影响。研究在莱基皮亚县的Mpala研究中心(控制放牧)和Ilmotiok社区团体牧场(连续放牧)进行。本研究采用分图排列的析因实验设计。放牧管理方式(控制放牧和连续放牧)和地形位置(中坡、坡脚和洼地)被划分为主要样地,而土地覆盖类型(裸地、草地和树木镶嵌)被划分为次要样地。分别在10 cm、0-10 cm、10 - 20 cm和20-30 cm深度采集土壤样品,进行MAOC和POC分析。使用R软件进行数据分析,当违反正态性和方差齐性假设时,进行非参数检验。结果与连续放牧(分别为0.352%和0.548%)相比,控制放牧的MAOC(0.361%)和POC(0.683%)更高,其中控制放牧的MAOC和POC分别提高了2.56%和24.64%。这在很大程度上可归因于植被恢复的改善,特别是在中坡地区。低洼地的MAOC最高,为0.367%,可能是由于侵蚀减少,保水能力提高。中坡和坡脚位置的MAOC均值较低,分别为0.358%和0.344%。深度分析表明,在20 cm处毛氧饱和度最高(0.90%),控制放牧使30 cm处的碳保持效果更好。同样,控制放牧的平均POC为0.683%,连续放牧的平均POC为0.548%,其中洼地的POC最高,为0.754%。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示,不同土地覆盖类型的MAOC和POC差异显著(MAOC的χ²= 42.701,p < 0.001, POC的χ²= 83.53,p < 0.001),其中树木镶嵌和裸地分别对POC和MAOC贡献最大。结论控制放牧和土地覆盖多样性对提高土壤碳储量具有重要作用。为了促进可持续的牧场管理,建议牧场管理者采用控制放牧的做法,并允许不同的土地覆盖类型,如树木镶嵌,以增加碳固存和生态系统的恢复能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信