Prevalence and severity of sacral dysmorphism and implications for safe transsacral screw placement in the Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian population: A retrospective matched cohort study
James Virgin , Claudia Paul , Tim Cheok , Kanishka Williams , Mark Rickman , Lucian Bogdan Solomon , Boopalan Ramasamy
{"title":"Prevalence and severity of sacral dysmorphism and implications for safe transsacral screw placement in the Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian population: A retrospective matched cohort study","authors":"James Virgin , Claudia Paul , Tim Cheok , Kanishka Williams , Mark Rickman , Lucian Bogdan Solomon , Boopalan Ramasamy","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare prevalence and severity of sacral dysmorphism in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a single centre retrospective matched cohort study in consecutive Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients who received a CT scan of the pelvis between January and March 2024 at our institution. Patients were excluded if they were under the age of 18 at the time of the scan or had a history of pelvic fractures or fixation. CT scans were assessed for both qualitative and quantitative features of sacral dysmorphism. The primary outcome of interest was the prevalence and severity of sacral dysmorphism in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian populations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>120 patients were included in the study - 60 Indigenous and 60 non-Indigenous Australians. All patients exhibited at least one characteristic of sacral dysmorphism. There was no difference in the prevalence of qualitative sacral dysmorphism between the two groups. Compared to their non-Indigenous counterpart, Indigenous patients demonstrated a lower S1 transsacral corridor coronal diameter (20.50 vs. 21.85 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.005), S1 oblique corridor axial diameter (17.90 vs. 19.60 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.028), S1 pelvic width (144.85 vs. 158.70 mm, <em>p</em> < 0.001), S2 transsacral corridor coronal diameter (13.70 vs. 14.95 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.013), S2 transsacral corridor axial diameter (10.60 vs. 11.55 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.013), and S2 pelvic width (126.60 vs 136.00 mm, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Additionally, in Indigenous patients, S1 and S2 transsacral and oblique S1 iliosacral fixation lengths were shorter. Where an S1 trans-sacral osseous corridor was not present, the S2 corridor was significantly larger in coronal, axial measurements across both groups (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Indigenous Australian patients exhibited more severe forms of sacral dysmorphism when compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. Additionally the overall prevalence of sacral dysmorphism across this Australian population was amongst the highest reported in the literature. This may present significant technical challenges and warrants consideration when performing percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 10","pages":"Article 112667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare prevalence and severity of sacral dysmorphism in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian populations.
Methods
We performed a single centre retrospective matched cohort study in consecutive Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients who received a CT scan of the pelvis between January and March 2024 at our institution. Patients were excluded if they were under the age of 18 at the time of the scan or had a history of pelvic fractures or fixation. CT scans were assessed for both qualitative and quantitative features of sacral dysmorphism. The primary outcome of interest was the prevalence and severity of sacral dysmorphism in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian populations.
Results
120 patients were included in the study - 60 Indigenous and 60 non-Indigenous Australians. All patients exhibited at least one characteristic of sacral dysmorphism. There was no difference in the prevalence of qualitative sacral dysmorphism between the two groups. Compared to their non-Indigenous counterpart, Indigenous patients demonstrated a lower S1 transsacral corridor coronal diameter (20.50 vs. 21.85 mm, p = 0.005), S1 oblique corridor axial diameter (17.90 vs. 19.60 mm, p = 0.028), S1 pelvic width (144.85 vs. 158.70 mm, p < 0.001), S2 transsacral corridor coronal diameter (13.70 vs. 14.95 mm, p = 0.013), S2 transsacral corridor axial diameter (10.60 vs. 11.55 mm, p = 0.013), and S2 pelvic width (126.60 vs 136.00 mm, p < 0.001). Additionally, in Indigenous patients, S1 and S2 transsacral and oblique S1 iliosacral fixation lengths were shorter. Where an S1 trans-sacral osseous corridor was not present, the S2 corridor was significantly larger in coronal, axial measurements across both groups (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Indigenous Australian patients exhibited more severe forms of sacral dysmorphism when compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. Additionally the overall prevalence of sacral dysmorphism across this Australian population was amongst the highest reported in the literature. This may present significant technical challenges and warrants consideration when performing percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation.
目的比较澳大利亚土著和非土著人群骶骨畸形的患病率和严重程度。方法:我们对2024年1月至3月期间在我院接受骨盆CT扫描的澳大利亚土著和非土著患者进行了单中心回顾性匹配队列研究。如果患者在扫描时年龄在18岁以下或有骨盆骨折或固定史,则排除在外。CT扫描评估骶骨畸形的定性和定量特征。研究的主要结果是澳大利亚土著和非土著人群中骶骨畸形的患病率和严重程度。结果120例患者被纳入研究- 60例土著和60例非土著澳大利亚人。所有患者均表现出至少一种骶骨畸形的特征。两组间定性骶骨畸形的患病率无差异。与非土著患者相比,土著患者表现出较低的S1经骶通道冠状直径(20.50 vs. 21.85 mm, p = 0.005)、S1斜通道轴径(17.90 vs. 19.60 mm, p = 0.028)、S1骨盆宽度(144.85 vs. 158.70 mm, p < 0.001)、S2经骶通道冠状直径(13.70 vs. 14.95 mm, p = 0.013)、S2经骶通道轴径(10.60 vs. 11.55 mm, p = 0.013)和S2骨盆宽度(126.60 vs. 136.00 mm, p < 0.001)。此外,在土著患者中,S1和S2经骶骨和斜S1髂骶固定长度较短。当S1经骶骨骨通道不存在时,两组的冠状和轴向测量中S2通道明显较大(p < 0.001)。结论与非土著患者相比,澳大利亚土著患者表现出更严重的骶骨畸形。此外,在澳大利亚人群中,骶骨畸形的总体患病率是文献报道中最高的。这可能会带来重大的技术挑战,在进行经皮髂骶螺钉固定时值得考虑。
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.