Elena Hayday , Kaya Scheman , C.Price Withers , Kayla Togneri , Kareem A. Zaghloul , Jeff Stout , Antonio Ivano Triggiani , Sara K. Inati
{"title":"Magnetoencephalography distributed source modeling identifies spatiotemporal propagation patterns of interictal epileptiform discharges","authors":"Elena Hayday , Kaya Scheman , C.Price Withers , Kayla Togneri , Kareem A. Zaghloul , Jeff Stout , Antonio Ivano Triggiani , Sara K. Inati","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an important adjunctive method used to localize interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). The equivalent current dipole (ECD) method, the current gold standard modeling approach, identifies a single point source of activity. However, IEDs propagate widely and may be better represented by distributed source modeling approaches. Here, we investigate how areas of maximal IED-related activity estimated using dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) compare to dipoles and surgical resections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed resting-state MEG recordings from 38 NIH patients. We localized areas of IED-related activity along the IED rising phase and peak using spatial clustering of the top 5% of dSPM activations, comparing localizations to ECD and surgical resection areas in seizure free patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified dominant primary activation clusters in all patients and non-primary clusters in 24/38 patients. Dipoles localized closer to primary than non-primary clusters. In 12 post-operative seizure-free patients, the primary cluster center of mass was significantly closer to the resected area than dipoles and more stable over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Distributed source modeling adds to our understanding of IED propagation patterns and may be useful in IED localization for epilepsy surgery planning.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>dSPM enhances pre-surgical planning by refining IED localization, potentially improving surgical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 2110971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725008235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an important adjunctive method used to localize interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). The equivalent current dipole (ECD) method, the current gold standard modeling approach, identifies a single point source of activity. However, IEDs propagate widely and may be better represented by distributed source modeling approaches. Here, we investigate how areas of maximal IED-related activity estimated using dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) compare to dipoles and surgical resections.
Methods
We analyzed resting-state MEG recordings from 38 NIH patients. We localized areas of IED-related activity along the IED rising phase and peak using spatial clustering of the top 5% of dSPM activations, comparing localizations to ECD and surgical resection areas in seizure free patients.
Results
We identified dominant primary activation clusters in all patients and non-primary clusters in 24/38 patients. Dipoles localized closer to primary than non-primary clusters. In 12 post-operative seizure-free patients, the primary cluster center of mass was significantly closer to the resected area than dipoles and more stable over time.
Conclusions
Distributed source modeling adds to our understanding of IED propagation patterns and may be useful in IED localization for epilepsy surgery planning.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.