Quantifying the carbon circularity, climate and energy benefits of plastic recycling through circular flow analysis: Application to plastic packaging waste in Japan
{"title":"Quantifying the carbon circularity, climate and energy benefits of plastic recycling through circular flow analysis: Application to plastic packaging waste in Japan","authors":"Cheng-Yao Zhang , Jun Nakatani , Biying Yu , Yi-Ming Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon circularity has attracted increasing attention alongside climate change impacts and fossil energy consumption in plastic recycling evaluations. Herein, we introduce the carbon flow and circular diagram (CFCD) method, a unified framework designed to assess plastic recycling by integrating carbon circularity, carbon neutrality, and fossil energy independence. CFCD visualizes carbon flows by mapping carbon inputs and outputs across various pathways. We apply our approach to the complex ecosystem of plastic packaging waste recycling in Japan. Our findings reveal that catalytic cracking preserves 56.8 % of carbon circularity, whereas mechanical recycling achieves moderate carbon circularity and climate benefit. High-efficient energy recovery delivers substantial climate and energy benefits with poor circularity. Gasification for ammonia production yields the highest energy benefit of 57.9 MJ/kg of waste yet is largely ineffective in improving carbon circularity, whereas the carbon capture and utilization emerges as a key strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108549"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carbon circularity has attracted increasing attention alongside climate change impacts and fossil energy consumption in plastic recycling evaluations. Herein, we introduce the carbon flow and circular diagram (CFCD) method, a unified framework designed to assess plastic recycling by integrating carbon circularity, carbon neutrality, and fossil energy independence. CFCD visualizes carbon flows by mapping carbon inputs and outputs across various pathways. We apply our approach to the complex ecosystem of plastic packaging waste recycling in Japan. Our findings reveal that catalytic cracking preserves 56.8 % of carbon circularity, whereas mechanical recycling achieves moderate carbon circularity and climate benefit. High-efficient energy recovery delivers substantial climate and energy benefits with poor circularity. Gasification for ammonia production yields the highest energy benefit of 57.9 MJ/kg of waste yet is largely ineffective in improving carbon circularity, whereas the carbon capture and utilization emerges as a key strategy.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.