Outcomes of Posterior Oblique Medial Epicondylectomy for the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Q3 Medicine
Shinsuke Morisaki MD, PhD , Kengo Yoshii PhD , Shinji Tsuchida MD, PhD , Ryo Oda MD, PhD , Kenji Takahashi MD, PhD
{"title":"Outcomes of Posterior Oblique Medial Epicondylectomy for the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome","authors":"Shinsuke Morisaki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kengo Yoshii PhD ,&nbsp;Shinji Tsuchida MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ryo Oda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kenji Takahashi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rates after posterior oblique medial epicondylectomy for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) and assess its efficacy in improving motor and sensory function with minimal postoperative morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients (51 extremities) with CuTS who underwent posterior oblique medial epicondylectomy between 2015 and 2023. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon. Patients were assessed before surgery and at a mean follow-up of 22 months by using the McGowan grading system, the Wilson and Krout classification, grip and pinch strength, two-point discrimination, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and visual analog scale scores. Statistical analysis included the Fisher exact test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After surgery, 90% of extremities improved by at least one McGowan grade. Wilson and Krout grading revealed outcomes of “excellent” in 31 patients, “good” in 17 patients, and “fair” in 3 patients. Significant improvements occurred in two-point discrimination (ring/little finger: from 12 to 6 mm) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), side pinch (from 4.0 to 6.5 kg) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), tip pinch (from 3.0 to 4.5 kg) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), and grip strength (from 25 to 30 kg) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores improved from 27 to 9.1, and visual analog scale scores decreased from 30 to 10 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). No patient had symptomatic ulnar nerve subluxation or elbow instability. Six patients reported mild medial elbow pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Posterior oblique medial epicondylectomy for CuTS yielded favorable outcomes with significant improvement in motor and sensory function and minimal complications. This technique may offer advantages over traditional medial epicondylectomy by preserving elbow stability and enabling early active range of motion during the postoperative period.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100809"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258951412500129X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rates after posterior oblique medial epicondylectomy for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) and assess its efficacy in improving motor and sensory function with minimal postoperative morbidity.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients (51 extremities) with CuTS who underwent posterior oblique medial epicondylectomy between 2015 and 2023. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon. Patients were assessed before surgery and at a mean follow-up of 22 months by using the McGowan grading system, the Wilson and Krout classification, grip and pinch strength, two-point discrimination, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and visual analog scale scores. Statistical analysis included the Fisher exact test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.

Results

After surgery, 90% of extremities improved by at least one McGowan grade. Wilson and Krout grading revealed outcomes of “excellent” in 31 patients, “good” in 17 patients, and “fair” in 3 patients. Significant improvements occurred in two-point discrimination (ring/little finger: from 12 to 6 mm) (P < .001), side pinch (from 4.0 to 6.5 kg) (P < .001), tip pinch (from 3.0 to 4.5 kg) (P < .001), and grip strength (from 25 to 30 kg) (P < .001). Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores improved from 27 to 9.1, and visual analog scale scores decreased from 30 to 10 (P < .001). No patient had symptomatic ulnar nerve subluxation or elbow instability. Six patients reported mild medial elbow pain.

Conclusions

Posterior oblique medial epicondylectomy for CuTS yielded favorable outcomes with significant improvement in motor and sensory function and minimal complications. This technique may offer advantages over traditional medial epicondylectomy by preserving elbow stability and enabling early active range of motion during the postoperative period.

Clinical relevance

Therapeutic IV.
后斜内上髁切除术治疗肘管综合征的疗效
目的评价后斜内上髁切除术治疗肘管综合征(CuTS)的临床疗效和并发症发生率,评价其在术后低发病率的情况下改善运动和感觉功能的效果。方法回顾性分析2015 - 2023年间行后斜内上髁切除术的48例切口患者(51条肢体)。所有手术均由一名资深外科医生完成。术前和平均随访22个月,采用McGowan分级系统、Wilson和Krout分级、握力和捏紧力、二点鉴别、手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾以及视觉模拟量表评分对患者进行评估。统计分析包括Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon有符号秩和检验。结果手术后,90%的患者的四肢至少改善了一个McGowan分级。Wilson和Krout评分显示31例患者的结果为“优秀”,17例为“良好”,3例为“一般”。两点辨别(无名指/小指:从12毫米到6毫米)(P < .001)、侧捏(从4.0公斤到6.5公斤)(P < .001)、指尖捏(从3.0公斤到4.5公斤)(P < .001)和握力(从25公斤到30公斤)(P < .001)均有显著改善。手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾评分从27分提高到9.1分,视觉模拟评分从30分下降到10分(P < .001)。没有患者出现症状性尺神经半脱位或肘部不稳。6例患者报告肘部内侧轻度疼痛。结论后斜内上髁切除术治疗急性上髁性割伤效果良好,运动和感觉功能明显改善,并发症少。与传统的内侧上髁切除术相比,该技术具有保留肘关节稳定性和术后早期活动范围的优势。临床相关性:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信