Biogas-fuelled refrigeration system as a pathway to reduce post-harvest losses in Sub-Saharan Africa: A feasibility evaluation

IF 7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Christina Alet Louw, George Mbella Teke, Johann F. Görgens, Eugéne van Rensburg
{"title":"Biogas-fuelled refrigeration system as a pathway to reduce post-harvest losses in Sub-Saharan Africa: A feasibility evaluation","authors":"Christina Alet Louw,&nbsp;George Mbella Teke,&nbsp;Johann F. Görgens,&nbsp;Eugéne van Rensburg","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Different process scenarios for biogas-fuelled refrigeration (BFR), to curb food loss in Sub-Saharan Africa by providing off-grid refrigeration, were compared in terms of techno-economic feasibility. Technical simplicity was a key consideration in the selection of four biogas-fuelled refrigeration options, i.e. (i) absorption dairy coolers for smallholders, (ii) containerized cool rooms for small-scale produce value chain actors, (iii) industrial icemakers for small-scale fish value chain actors, and (iv) combined heat and power (CHP) systems for the electrical requirements of refrigeration for abattoirs. Using discounted cash flow analysis, internal rates of return ranging from 15.13 % to 28.16 % (absorption cooler), −6.77 % to −2.79 % (CHP), 0.97 % to 22.84 % (cool room), and 0.74 % to 24.05 % (icemaker plants) were estimated. The absorption dairy chiller had the best techno-economic feasibility, particularly at the smallest scale (45 L refrigerator). The high feedstock requirements for the ice maker and the cool room processes could cause operational challenges, as they are less cost-effective than alternative solar-powered options. The abattoir CHP could provide sufficient electricity to cover refrigeration demands, although the levelised energy costs (heat and electricity) were not competitive. Implementing BFR in small-scale agricultural value chains requires financing upfront capital costs, efficient equipment operation and maintenance, and the supply of process water.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104518"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825003492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different process scenarios for biogas-fuelled refrigeration (BFR), to curb food loss in Sub-Saharan Africa by providing off-grid refrigeration, were compared in terms of techno-economic feasibility. Technical simplicity was a key consideration in the selection of four biogas-fuelled refrigeration options, i.e. (i) absorption dairy coolers for smallholders, (ii) containerized cool rooms for small-scale produce value chain actors, (iii) industrial icemakers for small-scale fish value chain actors, and (iv) combined heat and power (CHP) systems for the electrical requirements of refrigeration for abattoirs. Using discounted cash flow analysis, internal rates of return ranging from 15.13 % to 28.16 % (absorption cooler), −6.77 % to −2.79 % (CHP), 0.97 % to 22.84 % (cool room), and 0.74 % to 24.05 % (icemaker plants) were estimated. The absorption dairy chiller had the best techno-economic feasibility, particularly at the smallest scale (45 L refrigerator). The high feedstock requirements for the ice maker and the cool room processes could cause operational challenges, as they are less cost-effective than alternative solar-powered options. The abattoir CHP could provide sufficient electricity to cover refrigeration demands, although the levelised energy costs (heat and electricity) were not competitive. Implementing BFR in small-scale agricultural value chains requires financing upfront capital costs, efficient equipment operation and maintenance, and the supply of process water.
以沼气为燃料的制冷系统作为减少撒哈拉以南非洲收获后损失的途径:可行性评估
通过提供离网制冷来遏制撒哈拉以南非洲粮食损失的沼气燃料制冷(BFR)的不同工艺方案在技术经济可行性方面进行了比较。在选择四种以沼气为燃料的制冷方案时,技术简洁性是一个关键考虑因素,即(i)用于小农的吸收式乳制品冷却器,(ii)用于小规模生产价值链参与者的集装箱冷藏室,(iii)用于小规模鱼类价值链参与者的工业制冰机,以及(iv)用于屠宰场制冷电气要求的热电联产系统。使用贴现现金流分析,内部收益率估计范围为15.13%至28.16%(吸收式冷却器),- 6.77%至- 2.79%(热电联产),0.97%至22.84%(冷藏室)和0.74%至24.05%(制冰机)。吸收式乳品冷冻机具有最佳的技术经济可行性,特别是在最小规模(45升制冷机)下。制冰机和冷室工艺的高原料要求可能会导致操作上的挑战,因为它们比其他太阳能供电的选择成本效益低。屠宰场热电联产可以提供足够的电力来满足制冷需求,尽管能源成本(热和电)没有竞争力。在小规模农业价值链中实施BFR需要为前期资本成本、高效的设备运营和维护以及工艺用水的供应提供资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信