Advanced exergy analysis of vapor compression systems using low-GWP refrigerants and variable-frequency compressor

Q1 Chemical Engineering
Rahul Deharkar , Parth Prajapati , Bansi D. Raja , Vivek K. Patel
{"title":"Advanced exergy analysis of vapor compression systems using low-GWP refrigerants and variable-frequency compressor","authors":"Rahul Deharkar ,&nbsp;Parth Prajapati ,&nbsp;Bansi D. Raja ,&nbsp;Vivek K. Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the performance of a vapor compression refrigeration system equipped with three different expansion devices (capillary tube, thermostatic valve and an electronic valve) along with a variable-frequency compressor. The primary objective is to optimize system efficiency and identify a viable alternative to the high-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerant R134a. Conventional exergy analysis reveals that the electronic expansion valve minimizes exergy destruction across all alternative refrigerants compared to both a capillary tube and a thermostatic valve. Further insights are gained through advanced analysis, indicating that the R1234yf system exhibits 3.53 % lower exergy destruction than the R134a system. Notably, the evaporator emerges as the most sensitive component across all refrigerants, contributing the highest average exergy loss (0.88 kW) which can be substantially reduced to 0.67 kW (23.57 %) through pressure ratio optimization. These findings strongly suggest that the low-GWP refrigerant R1234yf presents the most promising alternative to R134a, offering both improved efficiency and reduced environmental impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Thermofluids","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Thermofluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202725003209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of a vapor compression refrigeration system equipped with three different expansion devices (capillary tube, thermostatic valve and an electronic valve) along with a variable-frequency compressor. The primary objective is to optimize system efficiency and identify a viable alternative to the high-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerant R134a. Conventional exergy analysis reveals that the electronic expansion valve minimizes exergy destruction across all alternative refrigerants compared to both a capillary tube and a thermostatic valve. Further insights are gained through advanced analysis, indicating that the R1234yf system exhibits 3.53 % lower exergy destruction than the R134a system. Notably, the evaporator emerges as the most sensitive component across all refrigerants, contributing the highest average exergy loss (0.88 kW) which can be substantially reduced to 0.67 kW (23.57 %) through pressure ratio optimization. These findings strongly suggest that the low-GWP refrigerant R1234yf presents the most promising alternative to R134a, offering both improved efficiency and reduced environmental impact.
先进的火用分析蒸汽压缩系统使用低gwp制冷剂和变频压缩机
本文研究了一种配备三种不同膨胀装置(毛细管、恒温阀和电子阀)和变频压缩机的蒸汽压缩制冷系统的性能。主要目标是优化系统效率,并确定一种可行的替代高全球变暖潜能值(GWP)制冷剂R134a。常规的火用分析表明,与毛细管和恒温阀相比,电子膨胀阀最大限度地减少了所有替代制冷剂的火用破坏。通过高级分析获得了进一步的见解,表明R1234yf系统的火能破坏比R134a系统低3.53%。值得注意的是,蒸发器是所有制冷剂中最敏感的部件,其贡献的平均火用损失最高(0.88 kW),通过压力比优化可大幅降低至0.67 kW(23.57%)。这些发现有力地表明,低gwp制冷剂R1234yf是R134a最有希望的替代品,既提高了效率,又减少了对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Thermofluids
International Journal of Thermofluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信