{"title":"Exploring Structural Adaptations to Cognitive Processing Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Priyadharshany Sandanapitchai, Reginald D.V. Nixon","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the evolving field of psychological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) has emerged as a first-line treatment, backed by robust empirical evidence. Despite the proven efficacy of CPT in improving PTSD symptoms, individuals face significant barriers when seeking treatment. To overcome these challenges, CPT has undergone testing in diverse settings, accompanied by structural modifications deviating from its commonly delivered format of weekly (or bi-weekly) face-to-face contact, including changes in delivery method, length or intensity of sessions, or format (e.g., group). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of these structural adaptations within CPT for treating PTSD. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 non-RCTs were included for the review. The meta-analysis of the 15 RCTs revealed significant improvements in PTSD and depression outcomes with structural adaptations of CPT. Generally, no significant differences were found when comparing these adaptations with standard CPT or non-CPT treatments, although this is accompanied by the caveat of likely modest power for subanalyses involving different comparator types. The findings suggest that adapting the delivery of CPT typically yields similar outcomes in PTSD symptom improvement as standard CPT and confirms its flexibility in addressing barriers to PTSD treatment access. Limitations and future directions are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 5","pages":"Pages 948-963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789425000255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the evolving field of psychological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) has emerged as a first-line treatment, backed by robust empirical evidence. Despite the proven efficacy of CPT in improving PTSD symptoms, individuals face significant barriers when seeking treatment. To overcome these challenges, CPT has undergone testing in diverse settings, accompanied by structural modifications deviating from its commonly delivered format of weekly (or bi-weekly) face-to-face contact, including changes in delivery method, length or intensity of sessions, or format (e.g., group). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of these structural adaptations within CPT for treating PTSD. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 non-RCTs were included for the review. The meta-analysis of the 15 RCTs revealed significant improvements in PTSD and depression outcomes with structural adaptations of CPT. Generally, no significant differences were found when comparing these adaptations with standard CPT or non-CPT treatments, although this is accompanied by the caveat of likely modest power for subanalyses involving different comparator types. The findings suggest that adapting the delivery of CPT typically yields similar outcomes in PTSD symptom improvement as standard CPT and confirms its flexibility in addressing barriers to PTSD treatment access. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.