Machine learning-accelerated distributed optimisation methods for optimal power flow: A review

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Robert Steven , Oleksiy V. Klymenko , Michael Short
{"title":"Machine learning-accelerated distributed optimisation methods for optimal power flow: A review","authors":"Robert Steven ,&nbsp;Oleksiy V. Klymenko ,&nbsp;Michael Short","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Modern power grids have become increasingly complex, with greater uncertainty due to the widespread integration of renewable energy resources potentially leading to higher operating costs. The optimal operation of these networks can be accomplished using optimal power flow (OPF), a fundamental optimisation tool for power networks with objectives including generation cost minimisation. Whilst the OPF problem itself is not new, quickly solving problems of a practical scale remains an active research area. Two approaches here are distributed optimisation and, more recently, machine learning (ML). Distributed optimisation improves scalability, avoids single points of failure, and enhances user privacy, whilst ML has the potential to provide solutions significantly faster than traditional optimisation methods. The goal of this review is to present approaches that overlap both areas, identifying complementary aspects as well as areas for further exploration. For example, one drawback of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), a distributed optimisation algorithm, is that it has slow convergence. Several reviewed papers have mitigated this by using ML to accelerate convergence through the prediction of consensus variable values, demonstrating improvements in terms of convergence time. Challenges remain, including the generalisation of results across different network topologies, something with the potential to be addressed with additional ML models such as graph neural networks (GNNs). Further areas to explore at the intersection of these two fields are identified, including augmented Lagrangian alternating direction inexact Newton (ALADIN) and overlapping Schwarz decomposition optimisation methods, as well as ML models such as GNNs and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116190"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008639","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern power grids have become increasingly complex, with greater uncertainty due to the widespread integration of renewable energy resources potentially leading to higher operating costs. The optimal operation of these networks can be accomplished using optimal power flow (OPF), a fundamental optimisation tool for power networks with objectives including generation cost minimisation. Whilst the OPF problem itself is not new, quickly solving problems of a practical scale remains an active research area. Two approaches here are distributed optimisation and, more recently, machine learning (ML). Distributed optimisation improves scalability, avoids single points of failure, and enhances user privacy, whilst ML has the potential to provide solutions significantly faster than traditional optimisation methods. The goal of this review is to present approaches that overlap both areas, identifying complementary aspects as well as areas for further exploration. For example, one drawback of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), a distributed optimisation algorithm, is that it has slow convergence. Several reviewed papers have mitigated this by using ML to accelerate convergence through the prediction of consensus variable values, demonstrating improvements in terms of convergence time. Challenges remain, including the generalisation of results across different network topologies, something with the potential to be addressed with additional ML models such as graph neural networks (GNNs). Further areas to explore at the intersection of these two fields are identified, including augmented Lagrangian alternating direction inexact Newton (ALADIN) and overlapping Schwarz decomposition optimisation methods, as well as ML models such as GNNs and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs).
最优潮流的机器学习加速分布式优化方法综述
现代电网变得越来越复杂,由于可再生能源的广泛整合,其不确定性更大,可能导致更高的运营成本。这些网络的最佳运行可以使用最优潮流(OPF)来完成,OPF是电网的基本优化工具,其目标包括发电成本最小化。虽然OPF问题本身并不新鲜,但快速解决实际规模的问题仍然是一个活跃的研究领域。这里有两种方法是分布式优化和最近的机器学习(ML)。分布式优化提高了可扩展性,避免了单点故障,并增强了用户隐私,而ML有可能比传统优化方法更快地提供解决方案。本综述的目的是提出重叠这两个领域的方法,确定互补方面以及进一步探索的领域。例如,一种分布式优化算法——乘法器的交替方向法(ADMM)的一个缺点是收敛速度慢。一些经过审查的论文通过使用ML通过预测共识变量值来加速收敛,从而缓解了这一问题,证明了收敛时间方面的改进。挑战仍然存在,包括跨不同网络拓扑的结果泛化,这有可能通过其他ML模型(如图神经网络(gnn))来解决。在这两个领域的交叉点上确定了进一步探索的领域,包括增强拉格朗日交替方向不精确牛顿(ALADIN)和重叠施瓦茨分解优化方法,以及ML模型,如gnn和物理信息神经网络(pinn)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信