Comparing Workloads of Night Shift and Day Shift Workers in Critical Care Ground Transport

Q3 Nursing
Zane Z. Grimm RN, BSN, CFRN , Nolan R. Suchora RN, BSN, CFRN
{"title":"Comparing Workloads of Night Shift and Day Shift Workers in Critical Care Ground Transport","authors":"Zane Z. Grimm RN, BSN, CFRN ,&nbsp;Nolan R. Suchora RN, BSN, CFRN","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With the expansion of critical care ground transportation call volumes will increase. The increase in volume as a trend in healthcare is shifted towards daylight shift workers compared to their counterparts. Having the added aspect of transport distance in interfacility transportation adds an increased workload with increasing distances.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aim to examine the relationship between distance traveled and patient volume to determine the correlation in workload between night shift workers and day shift workers in the interfacility critical care transport setting. The value of this information may be utilized to determine appropriate staffing levels and/or the need for crew downtime.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Utilizing quantitative data including call volume and Total transport mileage from a critical care transport service.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1293 patients were treated and transported 78,838.78 miles via critical care ground ambulance. Day shift workers transported 701 or 54% of the total patients. These patients were transported a total of 41,427.06 miles averaging 59.09 miles per patient. Night shift workers transported 592 patients or 46% of the total patients. These patients were transported a total of 36,298.42 miles averaging 61.31 miles per patient. Dayshift workers averaged 1.92 transports per shift compared to the 1.62 transports per shift of the night shift workers. The night shift workers, however, averaged 37.8 miles per shift compared to the 30.7 miles of day shift workers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Night shift workers in critical care ground transportation travel more miles with a lesser volume compared to their counterparts in the daytime who transport a higher quantity with lesser mileage, resulting in equal workloads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"44 5","pages":"Page 436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X2500197X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the expansion of critical care ground transportation call volumes will increase. The increase in volume as a trend in healthcare is shifted towards daylight shift workers compared to their counterparts. Having the added aspect of transport distance in interfacility transportation adds an increased workload with increasing distances.

Objective

We aim to examine the relationship between distance traveled and patient volume to determine the correlation in workload between night shift workers and day shift workers in the interfacility critical care transport setting. The value of this information may be utilized to determine appropriate staffing levels and/or the need for crew downtime.

Methods

Utilizing quantitative data including call volume and Total transport mileage from a critical care transport service.

Results

A total of 1293 patients were treated and transported 78,838.78 miles via critical care ground ambulance. Day shift workers transported 701 or 54% of the total patients. These patients were transported a total of 41,427.06 miles averaging 59.09 miles per patient. Night shift workers transported 592 patients or 46% of the total patients. These patients were transported a total of 36,298.42 miles averaging 61.31 miles per patient. Dayshift workers averaged 1.92 transports per shift compared to the 1.62 transports per shift of the night shift workers. The night shift workers, however, averaged 37.8 miles per shift compared to the 30.7 miles of day shift workers.

Conclusion

Night shift workers in critical care ground transportation travel more miles with a lesser volume compared to their counterparts in the daytime who transport a higher quantity with lesser mileage, resulting in equal workloads.
重症监护地面运输中夜班与白班工作负荷的比较
随着重症监护的扩大,地面运输呼叫量将会增加。与同行相比,随着医疗保健趋势的增加,数量转向了白班工人。在设施间运输中,随着距离的增加,运输距离的增加也增加了工作量。目的探讨医院间重症监护转运中夜班和白班工作人员工作量的关系。这些信息的价值可用于确定适当的人员配备水平和/或机组人员停机时间的需要。方法利用定量数据,包括呼叫量和总运输里程从一个重症监护运输服务。结果重症救护地面救护车共救治1293例患者,运送78,838.78英里。白班工人运送了701名患者,占总数的54%。这些患者总共被运送了41,427.06英里,平均每位患者59.09英里。夜班工人运送了592名患者,占患者总数的46%。这些患者总共被运送了36,298.42英里,平均每位患者61.31英里。白班工人平均每班搬运1.92次,夜班工人平均每班搬运1.62次。然而,夜班工人平均每班行驶37.8英里,白班工人平均每班行驶30.7英里。结论与白班重症监护地面运输人员相比,夜班重症监护地面运输人员的运输里程多,运输量少,运输量大,两者的工作量相等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信