Description of Critical Care Transport First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Failures

Q3 Nursing
Abby L. Blake DO , Kalle J. Fjeld MD , Pietra Oelke , Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH , Patricia R. Atchinson DO
{"title":"Description of Critical Care Transport First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Failures","authors":"Abby L. Blake DO ,&nbsp;Kalle J. Fjeld MD ,&nbsp;Pietra Oelke ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Patricia R. Atchinson DO","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Describe first pass endotracheal intubation failures as well as associated patient and procedural factors in a rural critical care transport service.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 years intubated by a mixed rotor wing and ground critical care transport service (nurse-paramedic teams) between January 2017 and June 2024. Direct and video laryngoscopy was available during the study period. The primary outcome was incidence of first pass failure. One intubation attempt was defined as the insertion of the laryngoscopy past the lips. First pass failure was defined as failure to place an endotracheal tube through the vocal cords on the first intubation attempt. Secondary outcomes included reason for failure as well as association of patient and procedural factors with failure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 389 intubations performed with 53 (13.6%) first pass failures. The most common reasons for failure were hypoxia (7, 13.2%), contamination (22, 41.5%), and anatomy (32, 60.4%). Multiple reasons for failure were cited in 15 first pass intubation attempts (28.3%). There was an association between first pass failure and predicted difficult airway OR 2.66 (95% CI 1.47-4.80). There was no association between operator type and first pass success rate. There was no association of first pass failure with bougie use, direct laryngoscopy, location of intubation, or pre-intubation hypoxia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>First pass failure occurred in approximately one in eight intubations. This descriptive analysis of intubation failure provides a starting point for further quality improvement work. Future work should incorporate systematic review of intubations with objective data (i.e. video-recorded laryngoscopy) and the use of an airway failure taxonomy to describe performance errors and allow for iterative quality improvement in a learning healthcare system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"44 5","pages":"Page 433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X25001907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Describe first pass endotracheal intubation failures as well as associated patient and procedural factors in a rural critical care transport service.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 years intubated by a mixed rotor wing and ground critical care transport service (nurse-paramedic teams) between January 2017 and June 2024. Direct and video laryngoscopy was available during the study period. The primary outcome was incidence of first pass failure. One intubation attempt was defined as the insertion of the laryngoscopy past the lips. First pass failure was defined as failure to place an endotracheal tube through the vocal cords on the first intubation attempt. Secondary outcomes included reason for failure as well as association of patient and procedural factors with failure.

Results

There were 389 intubations performed with 53 (13.6%) first pass failures. The most common reasons for failure were hypoxia (7, 13.2%), contamination (22, 41.5%), and anatomy (32, 60.4%). Multiple reasons for failure were cited in 15 first pass intubation attempts (28.3%). There was an association between first pass failure and predicted difficult airway OR 2.66 (95% CI 1.47-4.80). There was no association between operator type and first pass success rate. There was no association of first pass failure with bougie use, direct laryngoscopy, location of intubation, or pre-intubation hypoxia.

Conclusion

First pass failure occurred in approximately one in eight intubations. This descriptive analysis of intubation failure provides a starting point for further quality improvement work. Future work should incorporate systematic review of intubations with objective data (i.e. video-recorded laryngoscopy) and the use of an airway failure taxonomy to describe performance errors and allow for iterative quality improvement in a learning healthcare system.
重症监护运输第一次气管插管失败的描述
目的探讨农村危重病转运服务中首次气管插管失败及相关的患者和程序因素。方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2024年6月期间由混合旋翼和地面重症监护运输服务(护理-护理团队)插管的≥18岁患者。研究期间可进行直接喉镜检查和视频喉镜检查。主要观察指标为首次通过失败的发生率。一次插管尝试被定义为喉镜穿过嘴唇插入。第一次插管失败被定义为在第一次插管尝试时未能将气管内插管通过声带。次要结局包括失败的原因以及患者和手术因素与失败的关系。结果共行插管389例,首次插管失败53例(13.6%)。最常见的失败原因是缺氧(7.13.2%)、污染(22.41.5%)和解剖(32.60.4%)。首次插管失败的15例(28.3%)有多种原因。首次通过失败与预测气道困难OR之间存在关联,OR为2.66 (95% CI 1.47-4.80)。操作者类型与首次通过成功率之间没有关联。首次通过失败与布基使用、直接喉镜检查、插管位置或插管前缺氧没有关联。结论首次插管失败发生率约为1 / 8。这种对插管失败的描述性分析为进一步的质量改进工作提供了一个起点。未来的工作应结合客观数据(如视频记录喉镜)插管的系统回顾,并使用气道衰竭分类法来描述性能错误,并允许在学习医疗保健系统中迭代改进质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信