Grey-box modelling for tool wear prediction in milling: Fusion of finite element insights, time-resolved cutting signals and metaheuristic feature selection

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Wear Pub Date : 2025-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2025.206292
Amirmohammad Jamali , Amod Kashyap , Johannes Schneider , Michael Stueber , Volker Schulze
{"title":"Grey-box modelling for tool wear prediction in milling: Fusion of finite element insights, time-resolved cutting signals and metaheuristic feature selection","authors":"Amirmohammad Jamali ,&nbsp;Amod Kashyap ,&nbsp;Johannes Schneider ,&nbsp;Michael Stueber ,&nbsp;Volker Schulze","doi":"10.1016/j.wear.2025.206292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reliable prediction of tool wear is essential for ensuring productivity, quality, and cost-efficiency in modern machining operations. This study presents a hybrid Grey-Box machine learning framework that combines White-Box finite element simulation outputs (interface temperature, relative sliding velocity), process parameters (feed speed, cutting velocity, depth of cut), dynamic time-series features from cutting force measurements, with a Black-Box machine learning model to predict tool wear in high-speed milling. The experimental campaign involved TiN-coated and uncoated carbide tools under dry machining conditions, with flank and rake wear measured after each cutting pass. Finite element simulations were conducted to extract localized thermomechanical features, such as interface temperature and relative sliding velocity, which were used as physically meaningful inputs. A two-step feature selection method—based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA)—was employed to identify the most relevant input features. Among the machine learning models tested, the gradient boosting regressor (GBR) showed the highest accuracy, achieving coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) scores of 0.953 for rake wear and 0.920 for flank wear. Omitting White-Box features resulted in significantly lower performance, confirming their critical role. The model's predictions were also in line with the unseen test cases. These results highlight the effectiveness of combining simulation-informed features with empirical data for tool condition monitoring, offering a scalable and interpretable approach for predictive maintenance in smart manufacturing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23970,"journal":{"name":"Wear","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 206292"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wear","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164825005617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable prediction of tool wear is essential for ensuring productivity, quality, and cost-efficiency in modern machining operations. This study presents a hybrid Grey-Box machine learning framework that combines White-Box finite element simulation outputs (interface temperature, relative sliding velocity), process parameters (feed speed, cutting velocity, depth of cut), dynamic time-series features from cutting force measurements, with a Black-Box machine learning model to predict tool wear in high-speed milling. The experimental campaign involved TiN-coated and uncoated carbide tools under dry machining conditions, with flank and rake wear measured after each cutting pass. Finite element simulations were conducted to extract localized thermomechanical features, such as interface temperature and relative sliding velocity, which were used as physically meaningful inputs. A two-step feature selection method—based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA)—was employed to identify the most relevant input features. Among the machine learning models tested, the gradient boosting regressor (GBR) showed the highest accuracy, achieving coefficient of determination (R2) scores of 0.953 for rake wear and 0.920 for flank wear. Omitting White-Box features resulted in significantly lower performance, confirming their critical role. The model's predictions were also in line with the unseen test cases. These results highlight the effectiveness of combining simulation-informed features with empirical data for tool condition monitoring, offering a scalable and interpretable approach for predictive maintenance in smart manufacturing.
铣削中刀具磨损预测的灰盒建模:有限元见解、时间分辨切削信号和元启发式特征选择的融合
在现代加工操作中,刀具磨损的可靠预测对于确保生产率、质量和成本效益至关重要。本研究提出了一个混合灰盒机器学习框架,该框架将白盒有限元仿真输出(界面温度、相对滑动速度)、工艺参数(进给速度、切削速度、切削深度)、切削力测量的动态时间序列特征与黑盒机器学习模型相结合,以预测高速铣削过程中的刀具磨损。实验活动涉及在干式加工条件下镀锡和未镀锡硬质合金刀具,在每次切削后测量侧面和耙的磨损。通过有限元模拟提取局部热力学特征,如界面温度和相对滑动速度,作为有物理意义的输入。采用基于方差分析(ANOVA)和鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)的两步特征选择方法来识别最相关的输入特征。在测试的机器学习模型中,梯度增强回归器(GBR)的准确率最高,耙齿磨损的决定系数(R2)得分为0.953,翼齿磨损的决定系数(R2)得分为0.920。忽略白盒特性会导致性能显著降低,从而证实了它们的关键作用。该模型的预测也与未见过的测试用例一致。这些结果突出了将仿真信息特征与工具状态监测的经验数据相结合的有效性,为智能制造中的预测性维护提供了一种可扩展和可解释的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wear
Wear 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Wear journal is dedicated to the advancement of basic and applied knowledge concerning the nature of wear of materials. Broadly, topics of interest range from development of fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of wear to innovative solutions to practical engineering problems. Authors of experimental studies are expected to comment on the repeatability of the data, and whenever possible, conduct multiple measurements under similar testing conditions. Further, Wear embraces the highest standards of professional ethics, and the detection of matching content, either in written or graphical form, from other publications by the current authors or by others, may result in rejection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信