Optimal allocation of renewable energy resources in a smart grid under neutrosophic credibility-based uncertainty

IF 5.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Muhammad Zafar Abbas , Rukhshanda Anjum , Muhammad Umar Mirza , Abdulrahman A. Almehizia , Amir Hussain
{"title":"Optimal allocation of renewable energy resources in a smart grid under neutrosophic credibility-based uncertainty","authors":"Muhammad Zafar Abbas ,&nbsp;Rukhshanda Anjum ,&nbsp;Muhammad Umar Mirza ,&nbsp;Abdulrahman A. Almehizia ,&nbsp;Amir Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2025.103688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Modern research in renewable energy systems faces many challenges in dealing with uncertain data and inconsistent expert evaluations, particularly in the context of smart grid systems. Traditional multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods are incapable of representing the accumulated effect of truth, ambiguity and credibility, which are important factors when it comes to decision-making in energy planning. To address these limitations, this study presents a novel concept of neutrosophic credibility numbers (NCNs) as a new modeling tool that uses truth, indeterminacy and falsity components with credibility measurement for uncertainty representation. Based on NCNs, we introduce a novel aggregation operator termed as generalized neutrosophic fuzzy credibility numbers weighted averaging (GNFCNWA) operator which enhances aggregation of uncertain information and improves the credibility of decisions. Furthermore, we also provide an algorithm that extends the utilization of NCNs with the GNFCNWA operator in a complete approach to decision-making. In order to validate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, the method is applied to a case study in an optimal renewable energy resource allocation in sustainable energy systems in a smart grid. The analysis focuses on evaluating four major alternatives such as solar farm, wind park, battery storage system and hybrid energy systems on the basis of four key attributes including energy demand matching, transmission efficiency along with environmental impact and integration feasibility. The alternative solar farm stands out as an optimal alternative. A sensitivity analysis is performed using different set of value of the operator's parameter to confirm the robustness of the ranking outcomes. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with the existing methods confirms the efficacy of the proposed approach. Overall, the fusion of neutrosophic theory with credibility provides groundbreaking approach to sustainable energy systems and other engineering domains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"16 11","pages":"Article 103688"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447925004290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern research in renewable energy systems faces many challenges in dealing with uncertain data and inconsistent expert evaluations, particularly in the context of smart grid systems. Traditional multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods are incapable of representing the accumulated effect of truth, ambiguity and credibility, which are important factors when it comes to decision-making in energy planning. To address these limitations, this study presents a novel concept of neutrosophic credibility numbers (NCNs) as a new modeling tool that uses truth, indeterminacy and falsity components with credibility measurement for uncertainty representation. Based on NCNs, we introduce a novel aggregation operator termed as generalized neutrosophic fuzzy credibility numbers weighted averaging (GNFCNWA) operator which enhances aggregation of uncertain information and improves the credibility of decisions. Furthermore, we also provide an algorithm that extends the utilization of NCNs with the GNFCNWA operator in a complete approach to decision-making. In order to validate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, the method is applied to a case study in an optimal renewable energy resource allocation in sustainable energy systems in a smart grid. The analysis focuses on evaluating four major alternatives such as solar farm, wind park, battery storage system and hybrid energy systems on the basis of four key attributes including energy demand matching, transmission efficiency along with environmental impact and integration feasibility. The alternative solar farm stands out as an optimal alternative. A sensitivity analysis is performed using different set of value of the operator's parameter to confirm the robustness of the ranking outcomes. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with the existing methods confirms the efficacy of the proposed approach. Overall, the fusion of neutrosophic theory with credibility provides groundbreaking approach to sustainable energy systems and other engineering domains.
基于中性信用不确定性的智能电网可再生能源优化配置
可再生能源系统的现代研究在处理不确定的数据和不一致的专家评估方面面临许多挑战,特别是在智能电网系统的背景下。传统的多属性决策方法无法反映能源规划决策中重要因素真实性、模糊性和可信度的累积效应。为了解决这些限制,本研究提出了中性可信数(ncn)的新概念,作为一种新的建模工具,它将真值、不确定性和假值成分与可信度测量一起用于不确定性表示。在神经网络的基础上,引入广义中性模糊可信数加权平均(GNFCNWA)算子,增强了不确定信息的聚合,提高了决策的可信度。此外,我们还提供了一种算法,该算法在完整的决策方法中扩展了GNFCNWA算子对神经网络的利用。为了验证该方法的有效性,将该方法应用于智能电网可持续能源系统中可再生能源资源优化分配的实例研究。该分析主要基于能源需求匹配、传输效率与环境影响、集成可行性等四个关键属性,对太阳能发电场、风力发电场、电池储能系统和混合能源系统等四种主要替代方案进行了评估。替代太阳能农场作为最佳替代方案脱颖而出。使用不同的算子参数值集进行敏感性分析,以确认排序结果的稳健性。通过与现有方法的对比分析,验证了所提方法的有效性。总的来说,嗜中性理论与可信度的融合为可持续能源系统和其他工程领域提供了开创性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
441
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信