Peak Alpha Frequency Is Not Significantly Altered by Five Days of Experimental Pain and Repetitive Transcranial Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Samantha K. Millard, Alan K. I. Chiang, Nahian Chowdhury, Wei-Ju Chang, Andrew J. Furman, Enrico De Martino, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Siobhan M. Schabrun, David A. Seminowicz
{"title":"Peak Alpha Frequency Is Not Significantly Altered by Five Days of Experimental Pain and Repetitive Transcranial Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex","authors":"Samantha K. Millard,&nbsp;Alan K. I. Chiang,&nbsp;Nahian Chowdhury,&nbsp;Wei-Ju Chang,&nbsp;Andrew J. Furman,&nbsp;Enrico De Martino,&nbsp;Thomas Graven-Nielsen,&nbsp;Siobhan M. Schabrun,&nbsp;David A. Seminowicz","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) holds promise as a noninvasive pain treatment. Given the link between individual peak alpha frequency (PAF) of resting-state electroencephalographic recordings and pain sensitivity, and the potential for rTMS to modulate PAF, we investigated these relationships through a secondary analysis of established rTMS-induced analgesia in an experimental model of sustained muscle pain.</p><p>In a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled experiment, 30 healthy adults underwent either active (<i>n</i> = 15) or sham (<i>n</i> = 15) high-frequency rTMS (20 min) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for five consecutive days following the induction of sustained experimental pain by nerve growth factor (NGF) injected into the right extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle. The pain intensity was assessed daily for 14 days on a numerical rating scale (NRS). PAF of the resting-state electroencephalography (5 min) was assessed before and 1 day after the five rTMS treatment days.</p><p>The preregistered analysis revealed no significant changes in PAF following five consecutive days of active (from 9.90 ± 0.39 Hz to 9.95 ± 0.38 Hz) or sham (from 9.86 ± 0.44 Hz to 9.81 ± 0.35 Hz) rTMS, suggesting that the impact of rTMS on NGF-induced pain is independent of PAF modulation. However, exploratory analysis indicated an association between a larger absolute difference in baseline PAF to 10 Hz (i.e., the rTMS frequency) and higher NRS pain ratings at Day 5 in participants receiving active rTMS. This suggests rTMS is more efficient when delivered close to individual PAF or for those with PAF around 10 Hz, necessitating further exploration of PAF's role in rTMS-induced pain relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70219","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) holds promise as a noninvasive pain treatment. Given the link between individual peak alpha frequency (PAF) of resting-state electroencephalographic recordings and pain sensitivity, and the potential for rTMS to modulate PAF, we investigated these relationships through a secondary analysis of established rTMS-induced analgesia in an experimental model of sustained muscle pain.

In a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled experiment, 30 healthy adults underwent either active (n = 15) or sham (n = 15) high-frequency rTMS (20 min) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for five consecutive days following the induction of sustained experimental pain by nerve growth factor (NGF) injected into the right extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle. The pain intensity was assessed daily for 14 days on a numerical rating scale (NRS). PAF of the resting-state electroencephalography (5 min) was assessed before and 1 day after the five rTMS treatment days.

The preregistered analysis revealed no significant changes in PAF following five consecutive days of active (from 9.90 ± 0.39 Hz to 9.95 ± 0.38 Hz) or sham (from 9.86 ± 0.44 Hz to 9.81 ± 0.35 Hz) rTMS, suggesting that the impact of rTMS on NGF-induced pain is independent of PAF modulation. However, exploratory analysis indicated an association between a larger absolute difference in baseline PAF to 10 Hz (i.e., the rTMS frequency) and higher NRS pain ratings at Day 5 in participants receiving active rTMS. This suggests rTMS is more efficient when delivered close to individual PAF or for those with PAF around 10 Hz, necessitating further exploration of PAF's role in rTMS-induced pain relief.

Abstract Image

5天的实验性疼痛和重复经颅刺激左背外侧前额叶皮层并没有显著改变α峰频率
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)有望成为一种无创的疼痛治疗方法。考虑到静息状态脑电图记录的个体α峰频率(PAF)与疼痛敏感性之间的联系,以及rTMS调节PAF的潜力,我们通过在持续肌肉疼痛的实验模型中建立rTMS诱导的镇痛的二次分析来研究这些关系。在一项随机、单盲、假对照实验中,30名健康成人在连续5天内,通过向右桡侧腕短伸肌注射神经生长因子(NGF)诱导持续实验性疼痛后,对左背外侧前额皮质进行主动(n = 15)或假(n = 15)高频rTMS(20分钟)。采用数值评定量表(NRS)对疼痛强度进行连续14天的每日评估。静息状态脑电图(5 min) PAF分别在rTMS治疗前和治疗后1天进行评估。预登记分析显示,连续5天的活动(从9.90±0.39 Hz到9.95±0.38 Hz)或假(从9.86±0.44 Hz到9.81±0.35 Hz) rTMS后,PAF没有显著变化,这表明rTMS对ngf诱导的疼痛的影响与PAF调节无关。然而,探索性分析表明,在接受主动rTMS的参与者中,基线PAF至10 Hz(即rTMS频率)的绝对差异较大与第5天较高的NRS疼痛评分之间存在关联。这表明,对于那些PAF在10 Hz左右的患者,rTMS在接近单个PAF时更有效,需要进一步探索PAF在rTMS诱导的疼痛缓解中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信