Jenny Vojtech, Laura E Toles, Daniel P Buckley, Cara E Stepp
{"title":"Capturing the Intraspeaker Heterogeneity of Vocal Hyperfunction Using Spatiotemporal Indices of Relative Fundamental Frequency.","authors":"Jenny Vojtech, Laura E Toles, Daniel P Buckley, Cara E Stepp","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hyperfunctional voice disorders are highly prevalent yet difficult to characterize objectively. Relative fundamental frequency (RFF) has the potential to characterize these disorders but faces limited clinical use due to intersubject variability in mean RFF values. This study examined whether RFF variability offers insights beyond traditional mean measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Speech samples were collected from 132 adults: individuals with phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction (PVH; <i>n</i> = 44), nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction (NPVH; <i>n</i> = 44), and typical voices (controls; <i>n</i> = 44). Two measures of RFF variability-standard deviation and spatiotemporal index (STI)-were calculated along with mean RFF values. While standard deviation captures variability in magnitude, STI incorporates variability in time and magnitude. Permutational analyses of variance were conducted to assess relationships between group (PVH/NPVH/control) and the mean, standard deviation, and STI measures. Significant measures were entered along with demographic parameters into hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models using a training set (<i>n</i> = 102). Final model equations were then applied to an independent test set (<i>n</i> = 30) to predict group membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean and STI measures showed significant group differences, whereas standard deviation did not. Both mean and STI measures improved model performance after adjusting for demographics. Receiver operating characteristic analysis on the test set yielded acceptable classification (area under curve = 0.78) for group membership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variability in RFF, especially when considering both time and magnitude, captures subtle features of vocal hyperfunction that may be overlooked by traditional mean measures. These findings underscore the clinical value of advanced RFF variability metrics in characterizing vocal hyperfunction.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29903054.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4220-4235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Hyperfunctional voice disorders are highly prevalent yet difficult to characterize objectively. Relative fundamental frequency (RFF) has the potential to characterize these disorders but faces limited clinical use due to intersubject variability in mean RFF values. This study examined whether RFF variability offers insights beyond traditional mean measures.
Method: Speech samples were collected from 132 adults: individuals with phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction (PVH; n = 44), nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction (NPVH; n = 44), and typical voices (controls; n = 44). Two measures of RFF variability-standard deviation and spatiotemporal index (STI)-were calculated along with mean RFF values. While standard deviation captures variability in magnitude, STI incorporates variability in time and magnitude. Permutational analyses of variance were conducted to assess relationships between group (PVH/NPVH/control) and the mean, standard deviation, and STI measures. Significant measures were entered along with demographic parameters into hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models using a training set (n = 102). Final model equations were then applied to an independent test set (n = 30) to predict group membership.
Results: Mean and STI measures showed significant group differences, whereas standard deviation did not. Both mean and STI measures improved model performance after adjusting for demographics. Receiver operating characteristic analysis on the test set yielded acceptable classification (area under curve = 0.78) for group membership.
Conclusions: Variability in RFF, especially when considering both time and magnitude, captures subtle features of vocal hyperfunction that may be overlooked by traditional mean measures. These findings underscore the clinical value of advanced RFF variability metrics in characterizing vocal hyperfunction.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
