The Implementation of a Perioperative Registry in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Feasibility, Fidelity, and Acceptance Study.

Medical research archives Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.18103/mra.v13i6.6574
Joshua D Gazzetta, Poster P Mutambo, Mutimba B Mpabalwani, Mwamba Jc Mulenga, Cyrus Phiri, Kelvin Shaba, Emmanuel M Makasa
{"title":"The Implementation of a Perioperative Registry in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Feasibility, Fidelity, and Acceptance Study.","authors":"Joshua D Gazzetta, Poster P Mutambo, Mutimba B Mpabalwani, Mwamba Jc Mulenga, Cyrus Phiri, Kelvin Shaba, Emmanuel M Makasa","doi":"10.18103/mra.v13i6.6574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In low and middle-income countries, nine out of every ten persons is unable to access safe and timely surgery. The limited perioperative data in resource-limited settings compromises surgical and research capacity growth. By increasing data availability, surgical disparities may be addressed through research efforts and quality initiatives. This project aimed to implement and evaluate a perioperative registry in a tertiary care hospital in a low-income country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective emergency laparotomy perioperative registry was implemented in Zambia's largest teaching and referral hospital. Over the first 6-months of implementation, 162 patients were included. Data was collected postoperatively, before discharge, and at 30 days. The registries feasibility was assessed by evaluating patient accrual, retention, and 30-day completion rates. The registries fidelity was measured by evaluating data missingness. A participant acceptance survey was retrospectively collected and analyzed for the first 25 consecutively enrolled patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The capture rate of the registry could not be calculated due to a destroyed theatre logbook. The participant accrual and retention rates were 99.4% and 95.1%, respectively. The participant completion rate at 30-days was 75.6%. The overall incidence of missing information in the registry was 3.5%. More than 75% of participant responses to the acceptance survey were positive in each category regarding the ethical conduct of research and the storing of personal data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The value of this study is the reporting and evaluation of a successful perioperative registry implementation with minimal external funding. This framework is being used to develop new data registries and may provide a roadmap for other hospitals with resource constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":94137,"journal":{"name":"Medical research archives","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical research archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i6.6574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In low and middle-income countries, nine out of every ten persons is unable to access safe and timely surgery. The limited perioperative data in resource-limited settings compromises surgical and research capacity growth. By increasing data availability, surgical disparities may be addressed through research efforts and quality initiatives. This project aimed to implement and evaluate a perioperative registry in a tertiary care hospital in a low-income country.

Methods: A prospective emergency laparotomy perioperative registry was implemented in Zambia's largest teaching and referral hospital. Over the first 6-months of implementation, 162 patients were included. Data was collected postoperatively, before discharge, and at 30 days. The registries feasibility was assessed by evaluating patient accrual, retention, and 30-day completion rates. The registries fidelity was measured by evaluating data missingness. A participant acceptance survey was retrospectively collected and analyzed for the first 25 consecutively enrolled patients.

Results: The capture rate of the registry could not be calculated due to a destroyed theatre logbook. The participant accrual and retention rates were 99.4% and 95.1%, respectively. The participant completion rate at 30-days was 75.6%. The overall incidence of missing information in the registry was 3.5%. More than 75% of participant responses to the acceptance survey were positive in each category regarding the ethical conduct of research and the storing of personal data.

Conclusion: The value of this study is the reporting and evaluation of a successful perioperative registry implementation with minimal external funding. This framework is being used to develop new data registries and may provide a roadmap for other hospitals with resource constraints.

Abstract Image

资源有限条件下围手术期注册的实施:可行性、保真度和可接受性研究。
背景:在低收入和中等收入国家,每10人中就有9人无法获得安全和及时的手术。在资源有限的环境下,有限的围手术期数据损害了手术和研究能力的增长。通过增加数据的可用性,外科差异可以通过研究努力和质量倡议来解决。本项目旨在在一个低收入国家的三级医院实施和评估围手术期登记。方法:在赞比亚最大的教学和转诊医院实施前瞻性剖腹手术围手术期登记。在实施的前6个月,纳入了162名患者。术后、出院前和30天收集数据。通过评估患者的应计率、保留率和30天完成率来评估登记的可行性。通过评估数据缺失来衡量注册表的保真度。回顾性收集并分析前25名连续入组患者的参与者接受度调查。结果:由于手术室日志被破坏,无法计算登记的捕获率。参与者的累积率和保留率分别为99.4%和95.1%。30天的参与者完成率为75.6%。登记信息缺失的总发生率为3.5%。在接受调查的每个类别中,超过75%的受访者对研究的道德行为和个人资料的储存持肯定态度。结论:本研究的价值在于报告和评估一个成功的围手术期注册实施,外部资金最少。该框架正在用于开发新的数据登记册,并可能为资源有限的其他医院提供路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信