Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Secondary Analysis of the DiGest Trial.

IF 16.6
Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI:10.2337/dc25-0452
Laura C Kusinski, Nooria Atta, Danielle L Jones, Suzanne Smith, Louise Cooper, Linda M Oude Griep, Kirsten L Rennie, Emanuella de Lucia Rolfe, Helen R Murphy, Eleanor M Scott, Stephen J Sharp, Roy Taylor, Claire L Meek
{"title":"Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Secondary Analysis of the DiGest Trial.","authors":"Laura C Kusinski, Nooria Atta, Danielle L Jones, Suzanne Smith, Louise Cooper, Linda M Oude Griep, Kirsten L Rennie, Emanuella de Lucia Rolfe, Helen R Murphy, Eleanor M Scott, Stephen J Sharp, Roy Taylor, Claire L Meek","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but optimal metrics, ranges, and targets in this population are undefined. We assessed associations between CGM metrics and pregnancy outcomes in GDM.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>During the DiGest study, 425 women with GDM (diagnosed at median [IQR] 25.1 [18.3-27.7] weeks) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 received a dietary intervention, with masked Dexcom G6 CGM at 29 (n = 361), 32 (n = 215), and 36 (n = 227) weeks' gestation. For this secondary analysis, we used logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the Youden index to assess associations and predictive ability of CGM metrics, including pregnancy-specific time in range (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL [3.5-7.8 mmol/L]) and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CGM metrics at 29 weeks were significantly associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Participants achieving mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), TIRp ≥90%, or pregnancy-specific time above range (TARp) <10% at 29 weeks had a significantly lower risk of LGA (odds ratio [OR] 0.41 [95% CI 0.22, 0.77], 0.38 [0.20, 0.70], and 0.39 [0.20, 0.73], respectively) and SGA (0.26 [0.08, 0.79], 0.30 [0.10, 0.91], and 0.19 [0.06, 0.62], respectively). TARp <10% and mean nocturnal glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) were associated with a reduced odds of preterm birth (OR 0.40 [0.17, 0.94] and 0.42 [0.19, 0.97], respectively). A stricter range (63-120 mg/dL [3.5-6.7 mmol/L]) had similar performance overall, but had no single statistically robust TIR/TAR target across all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In women with GDM, CGM mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), ≥90% TIRp, or <10% TARp using a range of 63-140 mg/dL (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) at 29 weeks' gestation was associated with a low risk of suboptimal offspring outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but optimal metrics, ranges, and targets in this population are undefined. We assessed associations between CGM metrics and pregnancy outcomes in GDM.

Research design and methods: During the DiGest study, 425 women with GDM (diagnosed at median [IQR] 25.1 [18.3-27.7] weeks) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 received a dietary intervention, with masked Dexcom G6 CGM at 29 (n = 361), 32 (n = 215), and 36 (n = 227) weeks' gestation. For this secondary analysis, we used logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the Youden index to assess associations and predictive ability of CGM metrics, including pregnancy-specific time in range (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL [3.5-7.8 mmol/L]) and pregnancy outcomes.

Results: CGM metrics at 29 weeks were significantly associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Participants achieving mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), TIRp ≥90%, or pregnancy-specific time above range (TARp) <10% at 29 weeks had a significantly lower risk of LGA (odds ratio [OR] 0.41 [95% CI 0.22, 0.77], 0.38 [0.20, 0.70], and 0.39 [0.20, 0.73], respectively) and SGA (0.26 [0.08, 0.79], 0.30 [0.10, 0.91], and 0.19 [0.06, 0.62], respectively). TARp <10% and mean nocturnal glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) were associated with a reduced odds of preterm birth (OR 0.40 [0.17, 0.94] and 0.42 [0.19, 0.97], respectively). A stricter range (63-120 mg/dL [3.5-6.7 mmol/L]) had similar performance overall, but had no single statistically robust TIR/TAR target across all outcomes.

Conclusions: In women with GDM, CGM mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), ≥90% TIRp, or <10% TARp using a range of 63-140 mg/dL (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) at 29 weeks' gestation was associated with a low risk of suboptimal offspring outcomes.

妊娠期糖尿病妇女的持续血糖监测指标和妊娠结局:对DiGest试验的二次分析。
目的:持续血糖监测(CGM)在妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)中的应用越来越广泛,但该人群的最佳指标、范围和目标尚不明确。我们评估了GDM患者CGM指标与妊娠结局之间的关系。研究设计和方法:在DiGest研究期间,425名GDM(诊断为中位[IQR] 25.1[18.3-27.7]周)且BMI≥25 kg/m2的女性接受了饮食干预,在妊娠29 (n = 361)、32 (n = 215)和36 (n = 227)周时使用Dexcom G6 CGM。在这一次要分析中,我们使用逻辑回归、受试者工作特征曲线和约登指数来评估CGM指标的相关性和预测能力,包括妊娠特异性时间范围(TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL [3.5-7.8 mmol/L])和妊娠结局。结果:29周时的CGM指标与大胎龄(LGA)和小胎龄(SGA)显著相关。结论:在患有GDM的女性中,CGM平均血糖
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信