Repeatability of a Dual-Scheimpflug Placido Disc Corneal Tomographer/Topographer in Eyes with Keratoconus.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S530011
Anne Poulsen, Diane Haeji Jang, Mahmood Khan, Zaina Nabil Al-Mohtaseb, Michael Chen, Kalins Banerjee, Ingrid U Scott, Seth M Pantanelli
{"title":"Repeatability of a Dual-Scheimpflug Placido Disc Corneal Tomographer/Topographer in Eyes with Keratoconus.","authors":"Anne Poulsen, Diane Haeji Jang, Mahmood Khan, Zaina Nabil Al-Mohtaseb, Michael Chen, Kalins Banerjee, Ingrid U Scott, Seth M Pantanelli","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S530011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the repeatability of a combined Dual-Scheimpflug placido disc corneal tomographer/topographer (Ziemer Galilei G4) with respect to keratometric indices used to monitor progression of keratoconus (KCN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with KCN were prospectively enrolled. For each eye lacking history of corneal surgery, 5 measurements were taken in succession. Eyes in which 3 or more measurements could be obtained (defined by the device's 4 image quality metrics) were included in the analysis. The repeatability limits (RL) and interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for various parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two eyes from 25 patients met all image quality metrics, and 54 eyes from 38 patients met at least 3/4 criteria (all except the placido image quality metric). RLs for key parameters when 4/4 or ≥3/4 image quality metrics were met included: 0.37 and 0.77 diopters (D) for steep simulated keratometry, 0.79 and 1.65 D for maximum keratometry, 13.80 and 13.88 degrees for astigmatism axis, 0.64 and 0.56 µm for vertical coma magnitude, and 3.76 and 3.84 µm for thinnest pachymetry, respectively. The ICCs for all parameters were excellent (above 0.87) except for spherical aberration (0.77), which was still considered good.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual-Scheimpflug placido disc corneal tomographer/topographer is highly repeatable in quantifying parameters used in monitoring KCN. Excellent placido images are difficult to capture in eyes with KCN, but when available, increase the reliability of the measurements. When clinicians find that a topographic index changes by more than the RLs defined herein, they can have confidence that this represents real change and may appropriately recommend interventions such as corneal cross-linking or intrastromal corneal ring segments.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"2751-2758"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S530011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the repeatability of a combined Dual-Scheimpflug placido disc corneal tomographer/topographer (Ziemer Galilei G4) with respect to keratometric indices used to monitor progression of keratoconus (KCN).

Methods: Patients with KCN were prospectively enrolled. For each eye lacking history of corneal surgery, 5 measurements were taken in succession. Eyes in which 3 or more measurements could be obtained (defined by the device's 4 image quality metrics) were included in the analysis. The repeatability limits (RL) and interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for various parameters.

Results: Thirty-two eyes from 25 patients met all image quality metrics, and 54 eyes from 38 patients met at least 3/4 criteria (all except the placido image quality metric). RLs for key parameters when 4/4 or ≥3/4 image quality metrics were met included: 0.37 and 0.77 diopters (D) for steep simulated keratometry, 0.79 and 1.65 D for maximum keratometry, 13.80 and 13.88 degrees for astigmatism axis, 0.64 and 0.56 µm for vertical coma magnitude, and 3.76 and 3.84 µm for thinnest pachymetry, respectively. The ICCs for all parameters were excellent (above 0.87) except for spherical aberration (0.77), which was still considered good.

Conclusion: The dual-Scheimpflug placido disc corneal tomographer/topographer is highly repeatable in quantifying parameters used in monitoring KCN. Excellent placido images are difficult to capture in eyes with KCN, but when available, increase the reliability of the measurements. When clinicians find that a topographic index changes by more than the RLs defined herein, they can have confidence that this represents real change and may appropriately recommend interventions such as corneal cross-linking or intrastromal corneal ring segments.

Abstract Image

圆锥角膜双图式盘角膜层析仪/地形仪的重复性。
目的:探讨联合双scheimpflug - placido盘角膜断层仪/地形仪(Ziemer Galilei G4)在用于监测圆锥角膜(KCN)进展的角膜测量指标方面的可重复性。方法:前瞻性纳入KCN患者。对无角膜手术史的每只眼连续进行5次测量。可以获得3个或更多测量值的眼睛(由设备的4个图像质量指标定义)被纳入分析。计算了不同参数的重复性限(RL)和类间相关系数(ICC)。结果:25例患者的32只眼满足所有图像质量指标,38例患者的54只眼满足至少3/4个标准(除placido图像质量指标外)。当满足4/4或≥3/4图像质量指标时,关键参数的RLs分别为:陡峭模拟角膜屈光度为0.37和0.77,最大角膜屈光度为0.79和1.65 D,散光轴为13.80和13.88度,垂直彗差为0.64和0.56µm,最薄角膜屈光度为3.76和3.84µm。除球差0.77外,其余参数的ICCs均为良好,均在0.87以上。结论:双scheimpflug - placido盘角膜层析仪/地形仪在监测KCN定量参数方面具有高度可重复性。用KCN很难在眼睛中捕捉到优秀的胎盘图像,但如果可用,可以增加测量的可靠性。当临床医生发现地形指数的变化超过本文定义的RLs时,他们可以确信这代表了真正的变化,并可能适当地推荐干预措施,如角膜交联或角膜间质环段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信