Artificial intelligence for cardiac imaging is ready for widespread clinical use: Pro Con debate AI for cardiac imaging.

IF 2.1
BJR open Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzaf015
Domenico Mastrodicasa, Marly van Assen
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for cardiac imaging is ready for widespread clinical use: Pro Con debate AI for cardiac imaging.","authors":"Domenico Mastrodicasa, Marly van Assen","doi":"10.1093/bjro/tzaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in cardiac imaging, offering advancements in image acquisition, risk prediction, and workflow automation. However, its readiness for widespread clinical adoption remains debated. This review explores both sides of the argument across key domains. It discusses the advantages and challenges of AI for cardiac imaging regarding pre-and post-processing, risk-stratification and prognostication, workflow augmentation, regulatory and ethical frameworks, and cost-effectiveness of AI tools. It will discuss the diagnostic accuracy shown by AI for automated measurements, improved image quality and workflow efficiency with AI-driven worklist prioritization. The potential of personalized care using AI-based prognostic models. It discusses regulatory frameworks for approving AI tools, while ethical frameworks to ensure safe and ethical use of AI are being implemented, simultaneously reimbursement is becoming available, signalling growing trust in their safety and efficacy. It also addresses the challenges AI has yet to overcome, such as the lack of generalizability across diverse populations, limited availability of outcome data and cost-efficacy studies. Despite progress, regulatory and ethical frameworks still struggle to keep pace with AI's rapid evolution, raising concerns about accountability, patient safety, bias, data privacy, and algorithmic transparency.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":"7 1","pages":"tzaf015"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzaf015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in cardiac imaging, offering advancements in image acquisition, risk prediction, and workflow automation. However, its readiness for widespread clinical adoption remains debated. This review explores both sides of the argument across key domains. It discusses the advantages and challenges of AI for cardiac imaging regarding pre-and post-processing, risk-stratification and prognostication, workflow augmentation, regulatory and ethical frameworks, and cost-effectiveness of AI tools. It will discuss the diagnostic accuracy shown by AI for automated measurements, improved image quality and workflow efficiency with AI-driven worklist prioritization. The potential of personalized care using AI-based prognostic models. It discusses regulatory frameworks for approving AI tools, while ethical frameworks to ensure safe and ethical use of AI are being implemented, simultaneously reimbursement is becoming available, signalling growing trust in their safety and efficacy. It also addresses the challenges AI has yet to overcome, such as the lack of generalizability across diverse populations, limited availability of outcome data and cost-efficacy studies. Despite progress, regulatory and ethical frameworks still struggle to keep pace with AI's rapid evolution, raising concerns about accountability, patient safety, bias, data privacy, and algorithmic transparency.

Abstract Image

人工智能心脏成像已准备好广泛的临床应用:赞成辩论人工智能心脏成像。
人工智能(AI)在心脏成像方面取得了重大进展,在图像采集、风险预测和工作流程自动化方面取得了进步。然而,它是否准备好广泛的临床应用仍然存在争议。这篇综述探讨了双方在关键领域的争论。它讨论了人工智能在心脏成像方面的优势和挑战,包括预处理和后处理、风险分层和预测、工作流程增强、监管和道德框架以及人工智能工具的成本效益。它将讨论人工智能在自动测量、提高图像质量和人工智能驱动的工作列表优先级的工作流程效率方面所显示的诊断准确性。使用基于人工智能的预后模型进行个性化护理的潜力。它讨论了批准人工智能工具的监管框架,同时正在实施确保人工智能安全和合乎道德使用的道德框架,同时可以获得报销,这表明人们对其安全性和有效性的信任日益增强。它还解决了人工智能尚未克服的挑战,例如在不同人群中缺乏普遍性,结果数据和成本效益研究的可用性有限。尽管取得了进展,但监管和道德框架仍难以跟上人工智能的快速发展,引发了对问责制、患者安全、偏见、数据隐私和算法透明度的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信