Potential safety benefits associated with speed limit compliance in San Francisco and phoenix.

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eamon T Campolettano, Kristofer D Kusano, Trent Victor
{"title":"Potential safety benefits associated with speed limit compliance in San Francisco and phoenix.","authors":"Eamon T Campolettano, Kristofer D Kusano, Trent Victor","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2538726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Safer Speeds represents one part of the Vision Zero and Safe System Approach to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries. The objective of this paper was to estimate the potential safety benefits if all drivers in two U.S. cities complied with roadway speed limits on surface streets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sensor data from a fleet of automated driving system (ADS)-equipped vehicles operating a ride-hailing service were used to determine aggregate traffic speeds during free-flow conditions in Phoenix and San Francisco from over 1 million unique vehicle-road segment traversals. The current human driving speed distribution was estimated using opposite direction traffic speed observations to limit the influence of the ADS-equipped vehicle on surrounding vehicles' travel speeds. The speed-limit-compliant driving fleet consisted of speed observations involving the ADS-equipped vehicles. To estimate the potential safety benefits from reduced travel speeds associated with speed limit compliance, an exponential model relating the effect of speed reduction on fatal and injury crashes was applied, stratified by roadway speed limit. Recent fatality data from these cities was then used to quantify an estimate for lives saved simply through speed limit compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the roadway-location combinations considered, 33-49% of human drivers were observed to be speeding, with 85th percentile speeds 3.6-7.2 mph over the speed limit. Serious injury and fatality reductions associated with altering the current human-driven vehicle fleet speed distribution toward one that is speed limit compliant were observed to vary by roadway from 18-30% and 27-43%, respectively. When considering these fatality reduction rates in conjunction with available fatality data from FARS, an estimated 82 lives could be saved annually simply through speed limit compliance on surface streets, with 75 lives saved in the Phoenix metro area and 7 lives saved in San Francisco.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using novel data from an ADS-equipped vehicle fleet to estimate the travel speed distribution of both the current human driven and a speed compliant fleet, in conjunction with the Elvik speed framework, this study estimated a 30% reduction in fatalities on surface streets in two U.S. cities, highlighting the impact of speed limit compliance on fatality prevention for all road users and building on the existing body of traffic safety literature capturing the deleterious effects of speeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2538726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Safer Speeds represents one part of the Vision Zero and Safe System Approach to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries. The objective of this paper was to estimate the potential safety benefits if all drivers in two U.S. cities complied with roadway speed limits on surface streets.

Methods: Sensor data from a fleet of automated driving system (ADS)-equipped vehicles operating a ride-hailing service were used to determine aggregate traffic speeds during free-flow conditions in Phoenix and San Francisco from over 1 million unique vehicle-road segment traversals. The current human driving speed distribution was estimated using opposite direction traffic speed observations to limit the influence of the ADS-equipped vehicle on surrounding vehicles' travel speeds. The speed-limit-compliant driving fleet consisted of speed observations involving the ADS-equipped vehicles. To estimate the potential safety benefits from reduced travel speeds associated with speed limit compliance, an exponential model relating the effect of speed reduction on fatal and injury crashes was applied, stratified by roadway speed limit. Recent fatality data from these cities was then used to quantify an estimate for lives saved simply through speed limit compliance.

Results: Across the roadway-location combinations considered, 33-49% of human drivers were observed to be speeding, with 85th percentile speeds 3.6-7.2 mph over the speed limit. Serious injury and fatality reductions associated with altering the current human-driven vehicle fleet speed distribution toward one that is speed limit compliant were observed to vary by roadway from 18-30% and 27-43%, respectively. When considering these fatality reduction rates in conjunction with available fatality data from FARS, an estimated 82 lives could be saved annually simply through speed limit compliance on surface streets, with 75 lives saved in the Phoenix metro area and 7 lives saved in San Francisco.

Conclusion: Using novel data from an ADS-equipped vehicle fleet to estimate the travel speed distribution of both the current human driven and a speed compliant fleet, in conjunction with the Elvik speed framework, this study estimated a 30% reduction in fatalities on surface streets in two U.S. cities, highlighting the impact of speed limit compliance on fatality prevention for all road users and building on the existing body of traffic safety literature capturing the deleterious effects of speeding.

旧金山和凤凰城遵守限速规定的潜在安全效益。
目标:更安全的速度代表了零愿景和安全系统方法的一部分,以消除交通死亡和严重伤害。本文的目的是估计如果美国两个城市的所有司机都遵守地面街道的道路速度限制,潜在的安全效益。方法:使用来自配备自动驾驶系统(ADS)的车辆的传感器数据来确定凤凰城和旧金山自由流条件下的总交通速度,这些数据来自超过100万辆独特的车辆道路路段穿越。利用反方向交通速度观测估计当前人类驾驶速度分布,以限制配备ads的车辆对周围车辆行驶速度的影响。符合速度限制的驾驶车队包括配备ads的车辆的速度观察。为了估计与限速相关的行车速度降低所带来的潜在安全效益,我们采用了一个指数模型,将限速对致命和伤害事故的影响按道路限速分层。然后使用这些城市最近的死亡数据来量化仅通过遵守限速规定而挽救的生命的估计。结果:在考虑的道路位置组合中,33-49%的人类驾驶员被观察到超速,第85百分位数的速度超过限速3.6-7.2英里/小时。根据不同的道路,将当前的人类驾驶车辆的速度分布调整为符合速度限制的速度分布,可以分别减少18-30%和27-43%的严重伤害和死亡人数。当考虑到这些死亡率降低率和FARS的可用死亡率数据时,估计每年仅通过地面街道的限速规定就可以挽救82人的生命,其中凤凰城市区可以挽救75人的生命,旧金山可以挽救7人的生命。结论:结合Elvik速度框架,本研究利用来自配备ads系统的车队的新数据来估计当前人类驾驶和符合速度要求的车队的行驶速度分布,估计美国两个城市地面街道上的死亡人数减少了30%,突出了符合速度限制对所有道路使用者预防死亡的影响,并建立在现有交通安全文献的基础上,记录了超速的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信