Predictive value of anthropometric indices for incident of dyslipidemia: a large population-based study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Somayeh Ghiasi Hafezi, Atena Ghasemabadi, Negar Soleimani, Maryam Allahyari, Mina Moradi, Amin Mansoori, Rana Kolahi Ahari, Mark Ghamsary, Gordon Ferns, Habibollah Esmaily, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan
{"title":"Predictive value of anthropometric indices for incident of dyslipidemia: a large population-based study.","authors":"Somayeh Ghiasi Hafezi, Atena Ghasemabadi, Negar Soleimani, Maryam Allahyari, Mina Moradi, Amin Mansoori, Rana Kolahi Ahari, Mark Ghamsary, Gordon Ferns, Habibollah Esmaily, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00410-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dyslipidemia as a modifiable risk factor for chronic non-communicable diseases has become a worldwide concern. We aim to explore different anthropometric measures as predictors of dyslipidemia using various machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From the baseline of the Mashhad Stroke and Heart Atherosclerotic Disorder (MASHAD) study, a total of 9,640 participants were included in the analysis. Among them, 1,388 participants did not have dyslipidemia, while 8,252 participants had dyslipidemia. Various anthropometric indices were examined, including waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI), weight-adjusted waist index (WWI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), conicity index (C-index), body surface area (BSA), body adiposity index (BAI), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). The association between these indices and dyslipidemia was assessed using logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), neural networks (NN), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on our LR model, we found that several factors included, BAI, BSA, age, and WHR were significant. For example, for each unit increase in WHR, the odds of dyslipidemia increase by 9 time (OR = 90.29, 95%CI (4.09,21.08)). Additionally, our DT model indicated that BMI was the most influential predictor, followed by age and WHR. The LR model outperforms other models with the highest accuracy (0.89) and AUC-ROC score (0.89), showing strong ability to classify dyslipidemia cases. Feature importance analysis reveals variables like \"BSA\" contribute differently across models, with XGBoost relying more on it than LR. LR's balanced performance makes it the best choice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from machine learning models were in agreement, highlighting the significance of BMI, WHR, BSA, and BAI as key anthropometric indices for predicting dyslipidemia. These indices consistently emerged as strong predictors underscoring their importance in assessing the risk of dyslipidemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00410-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dyslipidemia as a modifiable risk factor for chronic non-communicable diseases has become a worldwide concern. We aim to explore different anthropometric measures as predictors of dyslipidemia using various machine learning methods.

Method: From the baseline of the Mashhad Stroke and Heart Atherosclerotic Disorder (MASHAD) study, a total of 9,640 participants were included in the analysis. Among them, 1,388 participants did not have dyslipidemia, while 8,252 participants had dyslipidemia. Various anthropometric indices were examined, including waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI), weight-adjusted waist index (WWI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), conicity index (C-index), body surface area (BSA), body adiposity index (BAI), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). The association between these indices and dyslipidemia was assessed using logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), neural networks (NN), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models.

Results: Based on our LR model, we found that several factors included, BAI, BSA, age, and WHR were significant. For example, for each unit increase in WHR, the odds of dyslipidemia increase by 9 time (OR = 90.29, 95%CI (4.09,21.08)). Additionally, our DT model indicated that BMI was the most influential predictor, followed by age and WHR. The LR model outperforms other models with the highest accuracy (0.89) and AUC-ROC score (0.89), showing strong ability to classify dyslipidemia cases. Feature importance analysis reveals variables like "BSA" contribute differently across models, with XGBoost relying more on it than LR. LR's balanced performance makes it the best choice.

Conclusion: The findings from machine learning models were in agreement, highlighting the significance of BMI, WHR, BSA, and BAI as key anthropometric indices for predicting dyslipidemia. These indices consistently emerged as strong predictors underscoring their importance in assessing the risk of dyslipidemia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人体测量指标对血脂异常事件的预测价值:一项基于人群的大型研究。
简介:血脂异常作为慢性非传染性疾病的可改变危险因素已成为全球关注的问题。我们的目标是利用各种机器学习方法探索不同的人体测量指标作为血脂异常的预测指标。方法:从马什哈德卒中和心脏动脉粥样硬化性疾病(MASHAD)研究的基线开始,共有9640名参与者被纳入分析。其中,1388名参与者没有血脂异常,8252名参与者有血脂异常。检测各人体测量指标,包括腰高比(WHtR)、体圆度指数(BRI)、腹容积指数(AVI)、体重调整腰围指数(WWI)、脂质堆积积(LAP)、内脏脂肪指数(VAI)、圆度指数(C-index)、体表面积(BSA)、体脂肪指数(BAI)、腰臀比(WHR)。使用逻辑回归(LR)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、神经网络(NN)、k近邻(KNN)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型评估这些指标与血脂异常之间的关系。结果:基于我们的LR模型,我们发现BAI、BSA、年龄和WHR等因素具有显著性。例如,WHR每增加一个单位,血脂异常的几率增加9倍(OR = 90.29, 95%CI(4.09,21.08))。此外,我们的DT模型显示BMI是最具影响力的预测因子,其次是年龄和腰臀比。LR模型以最高的准确率(0.89)和AUC-ROC评分(0.89)优于其他模型,显示出较强的血脂异常病例分类能力。功能重要性分析显示,像“BSA”这样的变量对不同模型的贡献不同,XGBoost比LR更依赖于它。LR的平衡性能使其成为最佳选择。结论:机器学习模型的结果是一致的,强调了BMI、WHR、BSA和BAI作为预测血脂异常的关键人体测量指标的重要性。这些指标一直是强有力的预测指标,强调了它们在评估血脂异常风险方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信