Perspectives on Quiet Quitting in Family Medicine Residency Programs.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kathleen M Young, Karen M Isaacs, Kate L Jansen
{"title":"Perspectives on Quiet Quitting in Family Medicine Residency Programs.","authors":"Kathleen M Young, Karen M Isaacs, Kate L Jansen","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.193586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Quiet quitting, or doing only the minimum work necessary for one's job, is a phenomenon in the work environment that has been discussed widely in popular media but only recently referenced in academic literature and not formally examined in the context of residency education. This study examined the concept of quiet quitting in residency education, gathering perspectives from leaders in family medicine residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quiet quitting and similar concepts were presented at a workshop at the 2024 Residency Leadership Summit hosted by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Participant responses were collected during the workshop from approximately 250 attendees to gather perspectives on and experiences with these behaviors in their residency programs. Investigators independently coded responses using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 215 participants (approximate response rate=86%) identified disengagement, professionalism concerns, and strategic time usage as quiet quitting behaviors in residency. Contributing factors to quiet quitting reflected generational shift in work values, systemic issues, faculty modeling, and lack of training or work experience. Identified consequences were primarily negative and related to decreased physician competence and poorer quality of patient care. Proposed interventions included making systemic changes, establishing clear expectations and consequences, and bolstering well-being and resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides residency leadership perspectives on quiet quitting in family medicine residency programs. Given the potential for negative consequences of quiet quitting on physician competence and patient care, developing a shared understanding of this phenomenon within residency education is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.193586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Quiet quitting, or doing only the minimum work necessary for one's job, is a phenomenon in the work environment that has been discussed widely in popular media but only recently referenced in academic literature and not formally examined in the context of residency education. This study examined the concept of quiet quitting in residency education, gathering perspectives from leaders in family medicine residency programs.

Methods: Quiet quitting and similar concepts were presented at a workshop at the 2024 Residency Leadership Summit hosted by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Participant responses were collected during the workshop from approximately 250 attendees to gather perspectives on and experiences with these behaviors in their residency programs. Investigators independently coded responses using thematic analysis.

Results: Responses from 215 participants (approximate response rate=86%) identified disengagement, professionalism concerns, and strategic time usage as quiet quitting behaviors in residency. Contributing factors to quiet quitting reflected generational shift in work values, systemic issues, faculty modeling, and lack of training or work experience. Identified consequences were primarily negative and related to decreased physician competence and poorer quality of patient care. Proposed interventions included making systemic changes, establishing clear expectations and consequences, and bolstering well-being and resilience.

Conclusions: This study provides residency leadership perspectives on quiet quitting in family medicine residency programs. Given the potential for negative consequences of quiet quitting on physician competence and patient care, developing a shared understanding of this phenomenon within residency education is important.

家庭医学住院医师项目中安静戒烟的观点。
背景和目的:安静辞职,或只做工作所需的最低限度的工作,是工作环境中的一种现象,在大众媒体上被广泛讨论,但最近才在学术文献中被提及,并没有在住院医师教育的背景下正式研究。本研究考察了住院医师教育中安静辞职的概念,收集了家庭医学住院医师项目领导者的观点。方法:在美国家庭医生学会主办的2024年住院医师领导峰会的研讨会上,提出了安静戒烟和类似的概念。研讨会期间收集了大约250名参与者的反馈,以收集他们在住院医师项目中对这些行为的看法和经验。调查人员使用主题分析对回答进行独立编码。结果:215名参与者的回答(大约答复率=86%)确定了离职、专业关注和战略性时间使用是住院医生安静的辞职行为。导致悄然辞职的因素包括工作价值观的代际转变、系统问题、教师模式以及缺乏培训或工作经验。确定的后果主要是负面的,与医生能力下降和患者护理质量下降有关。提议的干预措施包括进行系统性改革,建立明确的期望和后果,以及增强幸福感和复原力。结论:本研究提供住院医师领导对家庭医学住院医师安静辞职的看法。考虑到安静戒烟对医生能力和病人护理的潜在负面影响,在住院医师教育中形成对这一现象的共同理解是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信