Comparison of the Effect of Pressure Massage of Hegu Point with Kunlun-Taixi Points on Pain of Intramuscular Injection in Premature Newborns: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_313_23
Atefeh Jadidi, Fatemeh Ghasemi, Rasool Mohammadi, Fatemeh Janani, Fatemeh Valizadeh, Kimia Karami
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Pressure Massage of Hegu Point with Kunlun-Taixi Points on Pain of Intramuscular Injection in Premature Newborns: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Atefeh Jadidi, Fatemeh Ghasemi, Rasool Mohammadi, Fatemeh Janani, Fatemeh Valizadeh, Kimia Karami","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_313_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Performing painful procedures in premature newborns are prevalent. This study compared the effect of the pressure massage of Hegu point with Kunlun-Taixi points on the pain of intramuscular injection in premature newborns.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This triple-blind, parallel, clinical trial was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Shahid Rahimi Hospital, Khorramabad, Iran. Participants included 100 premature newborns randomly assigned to four groups (<i>n</i> = 25). The intervention groups received a counterclockwise pressure massage of the Hegu or Kunlun-Taixi points for two minutes. The placebo group received a pressure massage of the tip of the nose. The control group received routine care. The Astrid Lindgren and Lund Children's Hospital Pain Scale was used to observe pain behaviors before, during, and after intramuscular injection of vitamin K. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), repeated measures ANOVA, and Chi-square tests were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (Standard Deviation) of pain scores during injection in the Hegu massage, Kunlun-Taixi massage, control, and placebo groups were 5.92 (1.99), 5.94 (1.75), 6.66 (1.45), and 6.56 (1.61), respectively. Despite the lower pain scores of the intervention groups compared to the control and placebo groups, their difference was not statistically significant (<i>F</i> = 1.32; <i>p</i> = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using pressure massage before intramuscular injection of vitamin K has no significant effect on intramuscular injection pain in premature newborns. It is suggested that future studies of massage be performed for a more extended period, along with other pain relief methods for premature newborns.</p>","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":"30 4","pages":"606-611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_313_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Performing painful procedures in premature newborns are prevalent. This study compared the effect of the pressure massage of Hegu point with Kunlun-Taixi points on the pain of intramuscular injection in premature newborns.

Materials and methods: This triple-blind, parallel, clinical trial was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Shahid Rahimi Hospital, Khorramabad, Iran. Participants included 100 premature newborns randomly assigned to four groups (n = 25). The intervention groups received a counterclockwise pressure massage of the Hegu or Kunlun-Taixi points for two minutes. The placebo group received a pressure massage of the tip of the nose. The control group received routine care. The Astrid Lindgren and Lund Children's Hospital Pain Scale was used to observe pain behaviors before, during, and after intramuscular injection of vitamin K. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), repeated measures ANOVA, and Chi-square tests were used for data analysis.

Results: The mean (Standard Deviation) of pain scores during injection in the Hegu massage, Kunlun-Taixi massage, control, and placebo groups were 5.92 (1.99), 5.94 (1.75), 6.66 (1.45), and 6.56 (1.61), respectively. Despite the lower pain scores of the intervention groups compared to the control and placebo groups, their difference was not statistically significant (F = 1.32; p = 0.27).

Conclusions: Using pressure massage before intramuscular injection of vitamin K has no significant effect on intramuscular injection pain in premature newborns. It is suggested that future studies of massage be performed for a more extended period, along with other pain relief methods for premature newborns.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

压揉合谷穴与昆仑太西穴对早产儿肌内注射疼痛的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
背景:在早产新生儿中进行疼痛手术是很普遍的。本研究比较了压揉合谷穴与昆仑太西穴对早产儿肌注疼痛的影响。材料和方法:这项三盲、平行临床试验在伊朗霍拉马巴德Shahid Rahimi医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)进行。参与者包括100名早产儿,随机分为四组(n = 25)。干预组按合谷穴或昆仑太西穴逆时针按压2分钟。安慰剂组接受鼻尖的压力按摩。对照组接受常规护理。采用Astrid Lindgren and Lund儿童医院疼痛量表,观察肌肉注射维生素k前、中、后的疼痛行为。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、重复测量方差分析(repeated measures ANOVA)和卡方检验。结果:合谷按摩组、昆仑太西按摩组、对照组、安慰剂组注射时疼痛评分均值(标准差)分别为5.92(1.99)、5.94(1.75)、6.66(1.45)、6.56(1.61)。尽管干预组的疼痛评分低于对照组和安慰剂组,但差异无统计学意义(F = 1.32; p = 0.27)。结论:维生素K肌内注射前按压按摩对早产儿肌内注射疼痛无显著影响。我们建议,未来的研究应该进行更长的时间的按摩,以及其他缓解早产儿疼痛的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信