Association of the 2017 ACGME US Resident Duty Hour Policy Change With Hospital Quality and Patient Experience.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00960.1
Maya L Hunt, Jeanette W Chung, Yue-Yung Hu, Karl Y Bilimoria, Amy L Holmstrom
{"title":"Association of the 2017 ACGME US Resident Duty Hour Policy Change With Hospital Quality and Patient Experience.","authors":"Maya L Hunt, Jeanette W Chung, Yue-Yung Hu, Karl Y Bilimoria, Amy L Holmstrom","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00960.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> In 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) updated select US residency duty hour requirements to improve continuity of care and resident education. It is unknown if this policy change affected hospital quality of care and patient experience. <b>Objective</b> To evaluate the association of the 2017 duty hour policy change with hospital quality and patient experience in teaching vs nonteaching hospitals. <b>Methods</b> In this observational difference-in-differences (DiD) study, hospital quality (patient outcomes) and patient experience metrics were obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services <i>Care Compare</i> data from before (July 1, 2014-June 30, 2016) and after (July 1, 2017-June 30, 2019) the 2017 policy change in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Primary outcomes include hospital quality (five 30-day readmission indicator rates, five 30-day mortality rates, 8 patient safety indicators), and patient experience (5 measures from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey). <b>Results</b> A total of 2935 hospitals (250 teaching; 2685 nonteaching) were included. When comparing before and after the 2017 policy change, teaching hospitals had greater reductions in hospital-wide readmission (DiD coefficient -0.26; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.18; <i>P</i><.001), heart failure readmission (DiD coefficient -0.48; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.19; <i>P</i><.002), and stroke mortality rates (DiD coefficient -0.56; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.19; <i>P</i><.01) than did nonteaching hospitals. There were no significant differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in other outcomes before vs after policy change. <b>Conclusions</b> After the 2017 duty hour policy change, there was no evidence of worsening of hospital quality or patient experience in teaching hospitals, compared to nonteaching hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"17 4","pages":"486-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00960.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) updated select US residency duty hour requirements to improve continuity of care and resident education. It is unknown if this policy change affected hospital quality of care and patient experience. Objective To evaluate the association of the 2017 duty hour policy change with hospital quality and patient experience in teaching vs nonteaching hospitals. Methods In this observational difference-in-differences (DiD) study, hospital quality (patient outcomes) and patient experience metrics were obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Care Compare data from before (July 1, 2014-June 30, 2016) and after (July 1, 2017-June 30, 2019) the 2017 policy change in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Primary outcomes include hospital quality (five 30-day readmission indicator rates, five 30-day mortality rates, 8 patient safety indicators), and patient experience (5 measures from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey). Results A total of 2935 hospitals (250 teaching; 2685 nonteaching) were included. When comparing before and after the 2017 policy change, teaching hospitals had greater reductions in hospital-wide readmission (DiD coefficient -0.26; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.18; P<.001), heart failure readmission (DiD coefficient -0.48; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.19; P<.002), and stroke mortality rates (DiD coefficient -0.56; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.19; P<.01) than did nonteaching hospitals. There were no significant differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in other outcomes before vs after policy change. Conclusions After the 2017 duty hour policy change, there was no evidence of worsening of hospital quality or patient experience in teaching hospitals, compared to nonteaching hospitals.

2017年ACGME美国住院医师值班时间政策变化与医院质量和患者体验协会。
2017年,研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)更新了部分美国住院医师值班时间要求,以提高护理和住院医师教育的连续性。目前尚不清楚这一政策变化是否影响了医院的护理质量和患者体验。目的评价2017年教学医院与非教学医院值班时间政策变化与医院质量和患者体验的关系。方法在这项观察性差异中(DiD)研究中,从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的2017年教学医院和非教学医院政策变化之前(2014年7月1日- 2016年6月30日)和之后(2017年7月1日- 2019年6月30日)的护理比较数据中获得医院质量(患者结果)和患者体验指标。主要结局包括医院质量(5项30天再入院率、5项30天死亡率、8项患者安全指标)和患者体验(5项来自医院消费者对医疗服务提供者和系统的评估)。结果共纳入2935家医院,其中教学医院250家,非教学医院2685家。比较2017年政策改变前后,教学医院在全院范围内的再入院率下降幅度更大(DiD系数-0.26;95% CI, -0.34 ~ -0.18; ppp结论2017年值班时间政策改变后,与非教学医院相比,教学医院的医院质量或患者体验没有恶化的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信