Comparing non-surgical treatment strategies for adhesive capsulitis: A narrative review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shu-Mei Yang, Shu-Chiang Hsu, Pei-Xuan Shih, Ming-Yen Hsiao
{"title":"Comparing non-surgical treatment strategies for adhesive capsulitis: A narrative review.","authors":"Shu-Mei Yang, Shu-Chiang Hsu, Pei-Xuan Shih, Ming-Yen Hsiao","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adhesive capsulitis is a debilitating shoulder disorder characterized by persistent pain and progressive restriction of motion due to fibrotic changes within the joint capsule. Although intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly used, variable outcomes have prompted interest in targeted injection techniques, alternative injectates, and non-invasive therapies. This narrative review summarizes findings from 49 randomized controlled trials evaluating non-surgical treatments for adhesive capsulitis, including corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), hydrodilatation (HD), suprascapular nerve block (SSNB), and targeted injection strategies based on anatomical involvement. Evidence suggests that targeting sites like the rotator interval or applying multimodal strategies may enhance early symptom relief. SSNB has also been explored as a pain-relieving adjunct to intra-articular injections. HA offers a steroid-sparing option with comparable long-term outcomes, while PRP may benefit chronic cases via regenerative effects. HD facilitates early mobility through mechanical capsular disruption, while ESWT and PRF offer alternative mechanisms targeting pain modulation and tissue restoration. Tailoring treatment to disease stage and anatomical involvement, rather than applying generalized approaches, may improve outcomes. Standardization of therapeutic protocols and further high-quality trials assessing long-term efficacy are essential to guide clinical decision-making in the management of adhesive capsulitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.08.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adhesive capsulitis is a debilitating shoulder disorder characterized by persistent pain and progressive restriction of motion due to fibrotic changes within the joint capsule. Although intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly used, variable outcomes have prompted interest in targeted injection techniques, alternative injectates, and non-invasive therapies. This narrative review summarizes findings from 49 randomized controlled trials evaluating non-surgical treatments for adhesive capsulitis, including corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), hydrodilatation (HD), suprascapular nerve block (SSNB), and targeted injection strategies based on anatomical involvement. Evidence suggests that targeting sites like the rotator interval or applying multimodal strategies may enhance early symptom relief. SSNB has also been explored as a pain-relieving adjunct to intra-articular injections. HA offers a steroid-sparing option with comparable long-term outcomes, while PRP may benefit chronic cases via regenerative effects. HD facilitates early mobility through mechanical capsular disruption, while ESWT and PRF offer alternative mechanisms targeting pain modulation and tissue restoration. Tailoring treatment to disease stage and anatomical involvement, rather than applying generalized approaches, may improve outcomes. Standardization of therapeutic protocols and further high-quality trials assessing long-term efficacy are essential to guide clinical decision-making in the management of adhesive capsulitis.

比较非手术治疗粘连性囊炎的策略:叙述回顾。
粘连性肩关节囊炎是一种使人衰弱的肩关节疾病,其特征是由于关节囊内的纤维化改变导致持续疼痛和进行性活动受限。虽然关节内皮质类固醇注射是常用的,但不同的结果促使人们对靶向注射技术、替代注射和非侵入性治疗产生了兴趣。本文综述了49项随机对照试验的结果,评估了非手术治疗粘连性囊炎的方法,包括皮质类固醇、透明质酸(HA)、富血小板血浆(PRP)、脉冲射频(PRF)、体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)、水扩张(HD)、肩膜上神经阻滞(SSNB)和基于解剖受损伤的靶向注射策略。有证据表明,靶向部位如旋转间隙或应用多模式策略可能增强早期症状缓解。SSNB也被探索作为关节内注射的止痛辅助药物。HA提供了具有可比长期结果的类固醇节约选择,而PRP可能通过再生效果使慢性病例受益。HD通过机械荚膜破裂促进早期活动,而ESWT和PRF提供了针对疼痛调节和组织恢复的替代机制。根据疾病分期和解剖受累程度定制治疗,而不是采用一般化的方法,可能会改善结果。标准化的治疗方案和进一步的高质量试验评估长期疗效是指导临床决策的关键,在管理粘连性胶囊炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信