Hyeonjeong Go, Eun-Kyong Kim, Masae Kuboniwa, Youn-Hee Choi
{"title":"Physical and Psychosocial Frailty Indicators as Predictors of Oral Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Women.","authors":"Hyeonjeong Go, Eun-Kyong Kim, Masae Kuboniwa, Youn-Hee Choi","doi":"10.1111/joor.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With the growing older population, oral and general frailty have increased. This study aims to examine the association and predictive role of physical and psychosocial frailty indicators in oral frailty among older Korean women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 334 women aged 65 years or older participated in the 2017 health survey of the Korean Social Life, Health, and Aging Project on Ganghwa Island, Korea. We assessed oral frailty, including masticatory dysfunction, dysphagia, oral dryness and the number of remaining teeth. Oral frailty was categorised using cutoff values from 1 to 4. Physical frailty was assessed using appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM), handgrip strength, physical performance and body mass index (BMI). Psychosocial frailty was evaluated based on the Mini-Mental State Examination for Dementia Screening (MMSE-DS), feelings of loneliness, living alone, and reduced social activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with oral frailty (≥ 3 indicators) showed adjusted odds ratios of 0.62 for the ASMM (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.92), 0.91 for the BMI (95% CI 0.84-0.98), 0.90 for the MMSE-DS (95% CI 0.82-0.98) and 3.202 for loneliness (95% CI 1.40-7.35). The AUC values were greater than 0.7, with oral frailty (≥ 3 indicators) showing the highest Youden index, ranging from 0.12 to 0.32.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Physical and psychosocial frailty showed strong predictive ability for oral frailty, suggesting that declines in overall function and health are closely associated with deteriorating oral function in older adults. These findings highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to address the complex interrelationship between systemic frailty and oral health.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: With the growing older population, oral and general frailty have increased. This study aims to examine the association and predictive role of physical and psychosocial frailty indicators in oral frailty among older Korean women.
Methods: In total, 334 women aged 65 years or older participated in the 2017 health survey of the Korean Social Life, Health, and Aging Project on Ganghwa Island, Korea. We assessed oral frailty, including masticatory dysfunction, dysphagia, oral dryness and the number of remaining teeth. Oral frailty was categorised using cutoff values from 1 to 4. Physical frailty was assessed using appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM), handgrip strength, physical performance and body mass index (BMI). Psychosocial frailty was evaluated based on the Mini-Mental State Examination for Dementia Screening (MMSE-DS), feelings of loneliness, living alone, and reduced social activity.
Results: Individuals with oral frailty (≥ 3 indicators) showed adjusted odds ratios of 0.62 for the ASMM (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.92), 0.91 for the BMI (95% CI 0.84-0.98), 0.90 for the MMSE-DS (95% CI 0.82-0.98) and 3.202 for loneliness (95% CI 1.40-7.35). The AUC values were greater than 0.7, with oral frailty (≥ 3 indicators) showing the highest Youden index, ranging from 0.12 to 0.32.
Discussion: Physical and psychosocial frailty showed strong predictive ability for oral frailty, suggesting that declines in overall function and health are closely associated with deteriorating oral function in older adults. These findings highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to address the complex interrelationship between systemic frailty and oral health.
目的:随着老年人口的增长,口腔和全身虚弱有所增加。本研究旨在探讨身体和心理脆弱指标在韩国老年妇女口腔脆弱中的关联和预测作用。方法:共有334名65岁及以上的女性参加了2017年韩国江华岛韩国社会生活、健康和老龄化项目的健康调查。我们评估了口腔虚弱,包括咀嚼功能障碍、吞咽困难、口腔干燥和剩余牙齿的数量。使用截断值从1到4对口腔虚弱进行分类。采用阑尾骨骼肌质量(ASMM)、握力、体能表现和体重指数(BMI)评估身体虚弱程度。心理社会脆弱性的评估基于痴呆筛查迷你精神状态检查(MMSE-DS)、孤独感、独居和社交活动减少。结果:口腔虚弱(≥3项指标)的个体在ASMM方面的校正优势比为0.62(95%可信区间(CI) 0.49-0.92), BMI方面的校正优势比为0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.98), MMSE-DS方面的校正优势比为0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98),孤独方面的校正优势比为3.202 (95% CI 1.40-7.35)。AUC值均大于0.7,口腔虚弱(≥3项指标)约登指数最高,范围为0.12 ~ 0.32。讨论:身体和社会心理虚弱对口腔虚弱有很强的预测能力,这表明老年人整体功能和健康状况的下降与口腔功能恶化密切相关。这些发现强调了多学科方法的重要性,以解决系统脆弱和口腔健康之间复杂的相互关系。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.