Kai Bao, Beral Afacan, Jonas Grossmann, Angelika Silbereisen, Veli-Özgen Öztürk, Gulnur Emingil, Georgios N. Belibasakis, Nagihan Bostanci
{"title":"Saliva Versus All-Site Microbiome and Proteome Mapping in Periodontitis","authors":"Kai Bao, Beral Afacan, Jonas Grossmann, Angelika Silbereisen, Veli-Özgen Öztürk, Gulnur Emingil, Georgios N. Belibasakis, Nagihan Bostanci","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Saliva is a diagnostic surrogate for microbial and host biomarkers in periodontitis, but whether it reflects subgingival plaque, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) or serum remains debated. This study profiled GCF and subgingival plaque from all sites of periodontitis patients, comparing them to saliva and serum.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Saliva, serum, subgingival plaque and GCF were obtained from three patients with stage III, grade C periodontitis, having 23, 25 and 27 teeth, respectively, with six sites sampled per tooth. All plaque and GCF samples were pooled per patient. Shotgun sequencing and mass spectrometry proteomics were used for microbiome and proteome analysis, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Totally 277 microbial taxa were collectively identified in saliva and plaque, 93 of which were differentially abundant between the two. Saliva exhibited higher overall species diversity, but lower periodontal pathogen abundance. A total of 1153 host proteins were identified (saliva: 803; GCF: 932; serum: 195) across the three biological fluids, with 685 shared among saliva and GCF and 109 among all three. Saliva contained slightly fewer proteins than GCF, but shared several common immune, metabolic and enzyme regulation pathways.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Saliva is effective for broad microbiome and proteome screening; whereas plaque delivers greater precision in identifying specific periodontal pathogens directly associated with a periodontal pocket.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"52 11","pages":"1540-1549"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcpe.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpe.70017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Saliva is a diagnostic surrogate for microbial and host biomarkers in periodontitis, but whether it reflects subgingival plaque, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) or serum remains debated. This study profiled GCF and subgingival plaque from all sites of periodontitis patients, comparing them to saliva and serum.
Materials and Methods
Saliva, serum, subgingival plaque and GCF were obtained from three patients with stage III, grade C periodontitis, having 23, 25 and 27 teeth, respectively, with six sites sampled per tooth. All plaque and GCF samples were pooled per patient. Shotgun sequencing and mass spectrometry proteomics were used for microbiome and proteome analysis, respectively.
Results
Totally 277 microbial taxa were collectively identified in saliva and plaque, 93 of which were differentially abundant between the two. Saliva exhibited higher overall species diversity, but lower periodontal pathogen abundance. A total of 1153 host proteins were identified (saliva: 803; GCF: 932; serum: 195) across the three biological fluids, with 685 shared among saliva and GCF and 109 among all three. Saliva contained slightly fewer proteins than GCF, but shared several common immune, metabolic and enzyme regulation pathways.
Conclusion
Saliva is effective for broad microbiome and proteome screening; whereas plaque delivers greater precision in identifying specific periodontal pathogens directly associated with a periodontal pocket.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.