Lanqing Yang, Yi Zeng, Sixian Hu, Yi Xiao, Xiaoyong Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Chunchao Xia
{"title":"Assessing the Diagnostic Value of MRI T1rho Mapping in Predicting Molecular Prognostic Biomarkers and Subtypes of Breast Cancer.","authors":"Lanqing Yang, Yi Zeng, Sixian Hu, Yi Xiao, Xiaoyong Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Chunchao Xia","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognostic factors and molecular subtypes are important in treatment planning and predicting response to therapy in breast cancer, and the exploration of noninvasive imaging methods to characterize breast cancer has been ongoing.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the use of T1rho mapping in predicting the status of prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Ninety One women with breast tumors.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3T, T1 rho prepared balanced turbo field echo sequence.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Mean T1rho values were compared between positive and negative status of prognostic biomarkers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and proliferation index (Ki-67)] and molecular subtypes.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Independent t test, one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean T1rho values were significantly higher in ER-negative compared to ER-positive tumors (70 ± 6.769 vs. 55 ± 10.791 ms), in PR-negative compared to PR-positive tumors (68.48 ± 9.563 vs. 60.46 ± 10.099 ms), and in high Ki-67 proliferation compared to low Ki-67 proliferation tumors (66.59 ± 8.994 vs. 57.77 ± 11.501 ms). Significant negative correlations were observed between ER and PR statuses and T1rho values (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.416 and 0.392, respectively). The Ki-67 status was significantly positively correlated with T1rho values (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.369). The Luminal A subtype had a significantly lower T1rho value than other subtypes (56.46 ± 10.553 vs. 66.58 ± 9.204 ms). The Luminal B subtype had significantly lower T1rho values than the triple-negative (TN) subtype (63.957 ± 9.794 vs. 72.237 ± 8.229 ms). The TN subtype had a significantly higher T1rho value than luminal subtypes (72.237 ± 8.229 vs. 62.903 ± 10.289 ms). The T1rho values had good diagnostic performance in identifying Luminal A and TN breast cancers with areas under the ROC curve of 0.767 and 0.776.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>T1rho mapping has the potential to be a non-invasive imaging biomarker for evaluating the prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prognostic factors and molecular subtypes are important in treatment planning and predicting response to therapy in breast cancer, and the exploration of noninvasive imaging methods to characterize breast cancer has been ongoing.
Purpose: To evaluate the use of T1rho mapping in predicting the status of prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Study type: Prospective.
Subjects: Ninety One women with breast tumors.
Field strength/sequence: 3T, T1 rho prepared balanced turbo field echo sequence.
Assessment: Mean T1rho values were compared between positive and negative status of prognostic biomarkers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and proliferation index (Ki-67)] and molecular subtypes.
Statistical tests: Independent t test, one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Results: Mean T1rho values were significantly higher in ER-negative compared to ER-positive tumors (70 ± 6.769 vs. 55 ± 10.791 ms), in PR-negative compared to PR-positive tumors (68.48 ± 9.563 vs. 60.46 ± 10.099 ms), and in high Ki-67 proliferation compared to low Ki-67 proliferation tumors (66.59 ± 8.994 vs. 57.77 ± 11.501 ms). Significant negative correlations were observed between ER and PR statuses and T1rho values (rs = 0.416 and 0.392, respectively). The Ki-67 status was significantly positively correlated with T1rho values (rs = 0.369). The Luminal A subtype had a significantly lower T1rho value than other subtypes (56.46 ± 10.553 vs. 66.58 ± 9.204 ms). The Luminal B subtype had significantly lower T1rho values than the triple-negative (TN) subtype (63.957 ± 9.794 vs. 72.237 ± 8.229 ms). The TN subtype had a significantly higher T1rho value than luminal subtypes (72.237 ± 8.229 vs. 62.903 ± 10.289 ms). The T1rho values had good diagnostic performance in identifying Luminal A and TN breast cancers with areas under the ROC curve of 0.767 and 0.776.
Data conclusion: T1rho mapping has the potential to be a non-invasive imaging biomarker for evaluating the prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
背景:预后因素和分子亚型在乳腺癌的治疗计划和预测治疗反应中很重要,并且探索无创成像方法来表征乳腺癌一直在进行中。目的:评价T1rho图谱在预测乳腺癌预后生物标志物和分子亚型中的应用。研究类型:前瞻性。研究对象:91例乳腺肿瘤患者。场强/序列:3T, T1 rho制备平衡涡轮场回波序列。评估:比较预后生物标志物[雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)和增殖指数(Ki-67)]和分子亚型的阳性和阴性状态的平均T1rho值。统计检验:独立t检验、单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验、卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。结果:er阴性肿瘤的T1rho平均值显著高于er阳性肿瘤(70±6.769 vs 55±10.791 ms), pr阴性肿瘤的T1rho平均值显著高于pr阳性肿瘤(68.48±9.563 vs 60.46±10.099 ms), Ki-67高增殖肿瘤的T1rho平均值显著高于Ki-67低增殖肿瘤(66.59±8.994 vs 57.77±11.501 ms)。ER和PR状态与T1rho值呈显著负相关(rs分别为0.416和0.392)。Ki-67状态与T1rho值呈显著正相关(rs = 0.369)。Luminal A亚型T1rho值明显低于其他亚型(56.46±10.553 vs 66.58±9.204 ms)。Luminal B亚型T1rho值明显低于三阴性(TN)亚型(63.957±9.794 vs. 72.237±8.229 ms)。TN亚型T1rho值明显高于luminal亚型(72.237±8.229 ms vs. 62.903±10.289 ms)。T1rho值对Luminal A和TN乳腺癌具有较好的诊断价值,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.767和0.776。数据结论:T1rho定位有潜力成为评估乳腺癌预后生物标志物和分子亚型的非侵入性成像生物标志物。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.