Self-Reported Adherence to Cancer Therapy: Development and Validation of the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence-Cancer Measure.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yashasvini Sampathkumar, Corrine I Voils, Gina L Mazza, Lauren Rogak, Brenda F Ginos, Elizabeth D Kantor, Antonia V Bennett, Yulianny De Los Santos, Jennifer Suarez, Camila Lopez, Bharat Narang, Javier González, Kathleen Killoran, Patricia A Spears, Anna P Wolf, Anna Weiss, Stephanie B Wheeler, Bryce B Reeve, Ethan Basch, Francesca Gany, Victoria Blinder
{"title":"Self-Reported Adherence to Cancer Therapy: Development and Validation of the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence-Cancer Measure.","authors":"Yashasvini Sampathkumar, Corrine I Voils, Gina L Mazza, Lauren Rogak, Brenda F Ginos, Elizabeth D Kantor, Antonia V Bennett, Yulianny De Los Santos, Jennifer Suarez, Camila Lopez, Bharat Narang, Javier González, Kathleen Killoran, Patricia A Spears, Anna P Wolf, Anna Weiss, Stephanie B Wheeler, Bryce B Reeve, Ethan Basch, Francesca Gany, Victoria Blinder","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with cancer take different types of medications with varying schedules and settings. They are also sometimes instructed to stop medications due to toxicity. To measure self-reported nonadherence in this heterogeneous population, we modified and evaluated a measure originally developed to assess nonadherence to daily oral antihypertensives, the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The measure was refined in an iterative process incorporating feedback from patient investigators and participant interviews in English and Spanish. Branching logic was added for participant selection of medication administration setting: (1) only home, (2) only clinic, or (3) partly home/partly clinic. Participants reported their adherence to medications taken over a setting-specific reference period (1 week for home, 1 month for clinic medications). Participants who missed medications then reported on reasons for nonadherence. Adherence was dichotomized for analysis (complete adherence <i>v</i> any nonadherence). For participants who received clinic-administered medications, concordance between chart-abstracted and self-reported adherence was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three participants completed the measure (68% English; 32% Spanish; 86% female; 44% age ≥60 years). The majority had breast cancer; 64% had metastatic disease. Twenty-six percent (15/58) of participants who received medication in clinic and 24% (11/46) of those who took medication at home reported nonadherence. Participants felt able to respond accurately to both reference periods and perceived all reasons for nonadherence to be relevant. Among participants who completed the final version of the measure for clinic-administered medication, 96% (26/27) accurately reported their adherence compared with chart-abstracted data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support the validity of the DOSE-Nonadherence-Cancer for assessing cancer treatment nonadherence. This measure can be used to assess nonadherence in patients with cancer receiving a broad array of systemic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with cancer take different types of medications with varying schedules and settings. They are also sometimes instructed to stop medications due to toxicity. To measure self-reported nonadherence in this heterogeneous population, we modified and evaluated a measure originally developed to assess nonadherence to daily oral antihypertensives, the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence).

Methods: The measure was refined in an iterative process incorporating feedback from patient investigators and participant interviews in English and Spanish. Branching logic was added for participant selection of medication administration setting: (1) only home, (2) only clinic, or (3) partly home/partly clinic. Participants reported their adherence to medications taken over a setting-specific reference period (1 week for home, 1 month for clinic medications). Participants who missed medications then reported on reasons for nonadherence. Adherence was dichotomized for analysis (complete adherence v any nonadherence). For participants who received clinic-administered medications, concordance between chart-abstracted and self-reported adherence was evaluated.

Results: Seventy-three participants completed the measure (68% English; 32% Spanish; 86% female; 44% age ≥60 years). The majority had breast cancer; 64% had metastatic disease. Twenty-six percent (15/58) of participants who received medication in clinic and 24% (11/46) of those who took medication at home reported nonadherence. Participants felt able to respond accurately to both reference periods and perceived all reasons for nonadherence to be relevant. Among participants who completed the final version of the measure for clinic-administered medication, 96% (26/27) accurately reported their adherence compared with chart-abstracted data.

Conclusion: Our results support the validity of the DOSE-Nonadherence-Cancer for assessing cancer treatment nonadherence. This measure can be used to assess nonadherence in patients with cancer receiving a broad array of systemic therapies.

自我报告对癌症治疗的依从性:非依从性-癌症测量的主观程度领域的发展和验证。
目的:癌症患者在不同的时间表和环境下服用不同类型的药物。他们有时也会因为药物毒性而被要求停止用药。为了测量这些异质人群中自我报告的不依从性,我们修改并评估了最初用于评估每日口服抗高血压药物不依从性的测量方法,即主观不依从程度域(dose - noncompliance)。方法:在一个反复的过程中,结合患者研究者的反馈和参与者的英语和西班牙语访谈,对该措施进行了改进。增加了受试者选择给药设置的分支逻辑:(1)仅家庭,(2)仅诊所,或(3)部分家庭/部分诊所。参与者报告了他们在特定的参考期内(1周的家庭治疗,1个月的临床治疗)服用药物的依从性。错过服药的参与者随后报告了不坚持服药的原因。依从性被分为完全依从性和任何不依从性进行分析。对于接受临床给药的参与者,评估图表抽象和自我报告依从性之间的一致性。结果:73名参与者完成了测量(68%的英国人,32%的西班牙人,86%的女性,44%的年龄≥60岁)。大多数人患有乳腺癌;64%有转移性疾病。26%(15/58)在诊所接受药物治疗的参与者和24%(11/46)在家接受药物治疗的参与者报告不依从。参与者感到能够准确地对两个参考期作出反应,并认为所有不遵守的原因都是相关的。在完成临床给药测量的最终版本的参与者中,96%(26/27)准确地报告了他们的依从性,与图表抽象的数据相比。结论:我们的研究结果支持剂量-不依从-癌症评估癌症治疗不依从的有效性。该指标可用于评估癌症患者接受广泛的全身治疗的不依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信