Incident cardiovascular events in women with left-sided versus right-sided breast cancer: a propensity score-matched study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325912
Laurent Fauchier, Lisa Lochon, Thibault Lenormand, Bertrand Pierre, Alexandre Bodin, Arnaud Bisson
{"title":"Incident cardiovascular events in women with left-sided versus right-sided breast cancer: a propensity score-matched study.","authors":"Laurent Fauchier, Lisa Lochon, Thibault Lenormand, Bertrand Pierre, Alexandre Bodin, Arnaud Bisson","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cardiotoxic effects of breast cancer (BC) therapies, including drugs and radiotherapy (RT), may increase cardiovascular morbidity, particularly atrial fibrillation (AF). The specific impact of BC laterality on the incidence of cardiovascular events remains unclear. To evaluate laterality-specific cardiovascular risks in women with left-sided versus right-sided BC using a large international cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study used global healthcare data from the TriNetX network. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to select a cohort of women with left-sided or right-sided BC, and follow-up was conducted with a maximum duration of 8 years. Mortality, AF, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, heart failure and implantation of an ICD during follow-up. HRs, cumulative incidences and 95% CIs were calculated for evaluating the treatment effect among the treated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up (median 3.2 years), left-sided BC (compared with right-sided BC) was associated with a similar risk of all-cause death and of all incident cardiovascular events with the notable exception of a significantly higher risk of AF (HR 1.051, 95% CI 1.016 to 1.088, p=0.004). There was no statistical interaction for this higher risk of AF associated with left-sided BC when considering women treated with RT (1.024 (95% CI 0.941 to 1.113), p=0.58) or no RT (HR 1.045 (95% CI 1.006 to 1.084), p=0.02, p for interaction 0.66) CONCLUSIONS: In this large international analysis, left-sided BC was significantly associated with a numerically marginal but statistically significant higher risk of AF than right-sided BC, while there were no differences for BC laterality regarding all-cause death and other cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The cardiotoxic effects of breast cancer (BC) therapies, including drugs and radiotherapy (RT), may increase cardiovascular morbidity, particularly atrial fibrillation (AF). The specific impact of BC laterality on the incidence of cardiovascular events remains unclear. To evaluate laterality-specific cardiovascular risks in women with left-sided versus right-sided BC using a large international cohort.

Methods: This cohort study used global healthcare data from the TriNetX network. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to select a cohort of women with left-sided or right-sided BC, and follow-up was conducted with a maximum duration of 8 years. Mortality, AF, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, heart failure and implantation of an ICD during follow-up. HRs, cumulative incidences and 95% CIs were calculated for evaluating the treatment effect among the treated patients.

Results: During follow-up (median 3.2 years), left-sided BC (compared with right-sided BC) was associated with a similar risk of all-cause death and of all incident cardiovascular events with the notable exception of a significantly higher risk of AF (HR 1.051, 95% CI 1.016 to 1.088, p=0.004). There was no statistical interaction for this higher risk of AF associated with left-sided BC when considering women treated with RT (1.024 (95% CI 0.941 to 1.113), p=0.58) or no RT (HR 1.045 (95% CI 1.006 to 1.084), p=0.02, p for interaction 0.66) CONCLUSIONS: In this large international analysis, left-sided BC was significantly associated with a numerically marginal but statistically significant higher risk of AF than right-sided BC, while there were no differences for BC laterality regarding all-cause death and other cardiovascular events.

左侧与右侧乳腺癌女性的心血管事件发生率:一项倾向评分匹配研究
背景:乳腺癌(BC)治疗的心脏毒性作用,包括药物和放疗(RT),可能增加心血管发病率,特别是心房颤动(AF)。BC侧侧性对心血管事件发生率的具体影响尚不清楚。通过一项大型国际队列研究,评估左侧与右侧BC女性的侧侧特异性心血管风险。方法:本队列研究使用来自TriNetX网络的全球医疗保健数据。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)选择左侧或右侧BC的女性队列,随访时间最长为8年。死亡率,房颤,室性心动过速,心力衰竭和植入ICD随访期间。计算hr、累积发病率和95% ci来评价治疗患者的治疗效果。结果:在随访期间(中位3.2年),左侧BC(与右侧BC相比)与全因死亡和所有心血管事件的风险相似,但AF的风险明显较高(HR 1.051, 95% CI 1.016至1.088,p=0.004)。当考虑接受RT治疗的女性(1.024 (95% CI 0.941 ~ 1.113), p=0.58)或不接受RT治疗(HR 1.045 (95% CI 1.006 ~ 1.084), p=0.02, p为相互作用0.66)时,心房纤颤与左侧BC相关的高风险没有统计学上的相互作用。在这项大型的国际分析中,左侧BC与AF的数字边缘显著相关,但在统计上显著高于右侧BC,而在全因死亡和其他心血管事件方面,BC侧侧没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信