[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT outperforms [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in predicting treatment response in lupus nephritis.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Min Zhao, Chunqing Zhou, Hao Fang, Yan Cao, Marcus Hacker, Xiang Li, Muyao Guo, Xiaoping Yi, Xiaoli Zhang
{"title":"[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT outperforms [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in predicting treatment response in lupus nephritis.","authors":"Min Zhao, Chunqing Zhou, Hao Fang, Yan Cao, Marcus Hacker, Xiang Li, Muyao Guo, Xiaoping Yi, Xiaoli Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07523-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify predictors of complete response (CR) following induction therapy in lupus nephritis (LN) and comparatively evaluate the predictive value of baseline [18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT versus [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for treatment short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty biopsy-proven LN patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent dual-tracer PET/CT imaging, using both [18 F]F-FAPI and [18 F]F-FDG imaging prior to standardized induction therapy. Treatment response was assessed at 6 months, categorizing into CR, partial response (PR), and non-response (NR) groups. Associations between PET metrics, clinical biomarkers and treatment response were analyzed. Semiquantitative PET parameters including renal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline renal FAPI SUVmax was inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and positively with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (P < 0.05 for both), whereas FDG SUVmax showed no significant correlation with either parameter. At 6 months, 50% of patients achieved CR, 25% PR, and 25% NR. Patients with CR exhibited significantly lower baseline renal FAPI SUVmax and TBR compared to those with non-CR (PR + NR) (P < 0.01). Visual assessment of FAPI uptake outperformed FDG in predicting CR, with higher accuracy (85% vs. 70%), specificity (90% vs. 50%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 89% vs. 64%), while sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were comparable. Univariate logistic regression identified age > 35 years (P < 0.05) and negative baseline FAPI uptake (P < 0.01) as significant predictors of CR. In multivariate analysis, negative FAPI uptake remained the only independent predictor (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>[18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT demonstrates superior predictive performance over [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for short-term treatment response in lupus nephritis. It holds promise as a noninvasive imaging biomarker to guide clinical decision-making and optimize individualized therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07523-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify predictors of complete response (CR) following induction therapy in lupus nephritis (LN) and comparatively evaluate the predictive value of baseline [18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT versus [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for treatment short-term outcomes.

Materials and methods: Twenty biopsy-proven LN patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent dual-tracer PET/CT imaging, using both [18 F]F-FAPI and [18 F]F-FDG imaging prior to standardized induction therapy. Treatment response was assessed at 6 months, categorizing into CR, partial response (PR), and non-response (NR) groups. Associations between PET metrics, clinical biomarkers and treatment response were analyzed. Semiquantitative PET parameters including renal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were calculated.

Results: Baseline renal FAPI SUVmax was inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and positively with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (P < 0.05 for both), whereas FDG SUVmax showed no significant correlation with either parameter. At 6 months, 50% of patients achieved CR, 25% PR, and 25% NR. Patients with CR exhibited significantly lower baseline renal FAPI SUVmax and TBR compared to those with non-CR (PR + NR) (P < 0.01). Visual assessment of FAPI uptake outperformed FDG in predicting CR, with higher accuracy (85% vs. 70%), specificity (90% vs. 50%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 89% vs. 64%), while sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were comparable. Univariate logistic regression identified age > 35 years (P < 0.05) and negative baseline FAPI uptake (P < 0.01) as significant predictors of CR. In multivariate analysis, negative FAPI uptake remained the only independent predictor (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: [18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT demonstrates superior predictive performance over [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for short-term treatment response in lupus nephritis. It holds promise as a noninvasive imaging biomarker to guide clinical decision-making and optimize individualized therapy.

[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT在预测狼疮性肾炎治疗反应方面优于F-FDG PET/CT。
目的:确定狼疮性肾炎(LN)诱导治疗后完全缓解(CR)的预测因素,并比较评估基线[18 F]F- fapi PET/CT与[18 F]F- fdg PET/CT对治疗短期预后的预测价值。材料和方法:前瞻性纳入20例经活检证实的LN患者,在标准化诱导治疗前使用[18f]F- fapi和[18f]F- fdg成像进行双示踪PET/CT成像。6个月时评估治疗反应,分为CR组、部分缓解组(PR)和无缓解组(NR)。分析PET指标、临床生物标志物与治疗反应之间的关系。计算半定量PET参数,包括肾脏标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和靶本比(TBR)。结果:基线肾FAPI SUVmax与估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)呈负相关,与红细胞沉降率(ESR)呈正相关(P 35年)。结论:[18f]F-FAPI PET/CT对狼疮性肾炎短期治疗反应的预测效果优于[18f]F- fdg PET/CT。它有望成为一种无创成像生物标志物,指导临床决策和优化个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信