Margin Involvement After Excision with Preoperative Dermoscopic Assessment of Head and Neck Basal Cell Carcinomas - a Retrospective Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S519809
Laura Ziuzia-Januszewska, Irena Walecka, Małgorzata Kołos, Damian Zimoń, Marcin Januszewski, Eliza Brożek-Mądry
{"title":"Margin Involvement After Excision with Preoperative Dermoscopic Assessment of Head and Neck Basal Cell Carcinomas - a Retrospective Study.","authors":"Laura Ziuzia-Januszewska, Irena Walecka, Małgorzata Kołos, Damian Zimoń, Marcin Januszewski, Eliza Brożek-Mądry","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S519809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer in Caucasians, and its incidence is rising. Incompletely treated tumors may cause destruction of adjacent structures and significant morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate margin involvement after surgical BCC excision with preoperative dermoscopic assessment and identify tumor features associated with positive and inadequate margins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records of 230 head and neck BCCs, surgically excised after preoperative dermoscopic border assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 14 cases (6.2%) had positive margins, and 35 (16.1%) had inadequate (positive or close) margins. Lateral margins were positive and inadequate in 8 (3.5%) and 16 (7%) cases, respectively, while deep margins in 11 (4.8%) and 27 (12.6%) cases, respectively. The observed rate of lateral margin positivity is notably low compared to prior reports. Recurrence occurred in 2.8% of cases. Factors associated with inadequate margins included H-zone location (OR=3 [95% CI 1.1-8.1]), particularly on the nose (OR=2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.8]), aggressive histological subtypes (OR=4.3 [95% CI 1.7-11.1]), ulceration (OR=2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.8]), inflammatory infiltration (OR=3.9 [95% CI 1.7-8.7]), and elastosis (OR=2.9 [95% CI 1.2-6.8]). Lateral inadequate margin was more frequent in recurrent tumors (OR 5.3 [95% CI 1.6-16.9]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the role of preoperative dermoscopic lesion borders assessment and multidisciplinary approach in BCC treatments, especially for high-risk tumors when micrographic surgery is not feasible. While further randomized controlled trials are warranted, incorporating preoperative dermoscopic assessment of BCC borders into clinical practice could improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"1643-1656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S519809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer in Caucasians, and its incidence is rising. Incompletely treated tumors may cause destruction of adjacent structures and significant morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate margin involvement after surgical BCC excision with preoperative dermoscopic assessment and identify tumor features associated with positive and inadequate margins.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records of 230 head and neck BCCs, surgically excised after preoperative dermoscopic border assessment.

Results: Overall, 14 cases (6.2%) had positive margins, and 35 (16.1%) had inadequate (positive or close) margins. Lateral margins were positive and inadequate in 8 (3.5%) and 16 (7%) cases, respectively, while deep margins in 11 (4.8%) and 27 (12.6%) cases, respectively. The observed rate of lateral margin positivity is notably low compared to prior reports. Recurrence occurred in 2.8% of cases. Factors associated with inadequate margins included H-zone location (OR=3 [95% CI 1.1-8.1]), particularly on the nose (OR=2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.8]), aggressive histological subtypes (OR=4.3 [95% CI 1.7-11.1]), ulceration (OR=2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.8]), inflammatory infiltration (OR=3.9 [95% CI 1.7-8.7]), and elastosis (OR=2.9 [95% CI 1.2-6.8]). Lateral inadequate margin was more frequent in recurrent tumors (OR 5.3 [95% CI 1.6-16.9]).

Conclusion: This study supports the role of preoperative dermoscopic lesion borders assessment and multidisciplinary approach in BCC treatments, especially for high-risk tumors when micrographic surgery is not feasible. While further randomized controlled trials are warranted, incorporating preoperative dermoscopic assessment of BCC borders into clinical practice could improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Abstract Image

术前皮肤镜评估头颈部基底细胞癌切除后边缘受累的回顾性研究。
目的:基底细胞癌(BCC)是白种人最常见的癌症,其发病率呈上升趋势。不完全治疗的肿瘤可能导致邻近结构的破坏和显著的发病率。本研究旨在通过术前皮肤镜评估BCC手术切除后的边缘受累性,并确定与边缘阳性和不充分相关的肿瘤特征。方法:回顾性分析230例术前皮镜边界评估后手术切除的头颈部bcc的电子病历。结果:总的来说,14例(6.2%)有阳性边缘,35例(16.1%)有不充分(阳性或关闭)边缘。侧缘阳性和不充分分别为8例(3.5%)和16例(7%),深缘分别为11例(4.8%)和27例(12.6%)。与先前的报道相比,观察到的侧缘阳性率明显较低。复发率为2.8%。与切缘不充分相关的因素包括h区位置(OR=3 [95% CI 1.1-8.1]),特别是鼻子(OR=2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.8])、侵袭性组织学亚型(OR=4.3 [95% CI 1.7-11.1])、溃疡(OR=2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.8])、炎症浸润(OR=3.9 [95% CI 1.7-8.7])和弹性弹性(OR=2.9 [95% CI 1.2-6.8])。侧切缘不足在复发肿瘤中更为常见(OR 5.3 [95% CI 1.6-16.9])。结论:本研究支持术前皮肤镜病变边界评估和多学科方法在BCC治疗中的作用,特别是对于无法进行显微手术的高危肿瘤。虽然需要进一步的随机对照试验,但将术前皮肤镜评估BCC边界纳入临床实践可以改善患者的预后并降低医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信