Feasibility of Implementing the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) Program in an Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Katherine M Abbott, Molly Noble, Allison R Heid, Amy Kotterman, Kathleen T Unroe, Kimberly Van Haitsma
{"title":"Feasibility of Implementing the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) Program in an Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trial.","authors":"Katherine M Abbott, Molly Noble, Allison R Heid, Amy Kotterman, Kathleen T Unroe, Kimberly Van Haitsma","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2547742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Intervention (IPPI) is an evidence-based program that engages people living with dementia (PLWD) in brief (i.e. 10 minute) one-to-one preference-based activities two times a week. This study evaluated the feasibility of pragmatically implementing a pilot embedded pragmatic clinical trial of the IPPI program in nine nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Feasibility was defined as the ability of NH communities to establish implementation champions and an implementation team, complete training, identify and enroll eligible residents, match IPPI protocols to residents' stated preferences, complete an average of two IPPIs per week per resident for 6 months, and complete IPPIs with fidelity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven NHs completed the project, enrolling a total of 130 eligible residents. Seventy staff were trained. Staff identified preferences, corresponding IPPIs, and a targeted symptom of distress for all enrolled residents. Staff completed an average of 44.71 IPPIs per person (over six months) for those that did not pass away or discharge, with an average of 3.91 days between IPPIs. All staff reached at least 80% intervention delivery fidelity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The IPPI program is a feasible nonpharmacologic intervention for PLWD that can be implemented with fidelity over time in nursing homes by staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2547742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Intervention (IPPI) is an evidence-based program that engages people living with dementia (PLWD) in brief (i.e. 10 minute) one-to-one preference-based activities two times a week. This study evaluated the feasibility of pragmatically implementing a pilot embedded pragmatic clinical trial of the IPPI program in nine nursing homes.

Methods: Feasibility was defined as the ability of NH communities to establish implementation champions and an implementation team, complete training, identify and enroll eligible residents, match IPPI protocols to residents' stated preferences, complete an average of two IPPIs per week per resident for 6 months, and complete IPPIs with fidelity.

Results: Seven NHs completed the project, enrolling a total of 130 eligible residents. Seventy staff were trained. Staff identified preferences, corresponding IPPIs, and a targeted symptom of distress for all enrolled residents. Staff completed an average of 44.71 IPPIs per person (over six months) for those that did not pass away or discharge, with an average of 3.91 days between IPPIs. All staff reached at least 80% intervention delivery fidelity.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The IPPI program is a feasible nonpharmacologic intervention for PLWD that can be implemented with fidelity over time in nursing homes by staff.

在嵌入式实用临床试验中实施个体化积极社会心理互动(IPPI)计划的可行性。
目标:个体化积极心理社会干预(IPPI)是一个以证据为基础的项目,让痴呆症患者(PLWD)参加简短的(即10分钟)一对一的基于偏好的活动,每周两次。本研究评估了在9个疗养院实际实施IPPI计划的试点嵌入式实用临床试验的可行性。方法:可行性定义为NH社区建立实施冠军和实施团队的能力,完成培训,识别和招募符合条件的居民,将IPPI协议与居民所述的偏好相匹配,平均每个居民每周完成两次IPPIs,持续6个月,并忠实完成IPPIs。结果:七个NHs完成了该项目,共招募了130名符合条件的居民。培训了70名工作人员。工作人员确定了所有登记居民的偏好,相应的IPPIs和有针对性的痛苦症状。未去世或未出院的患者平均每人完成了44.71次ippi(超过6个月),每次ippi间隔平均为3.91天。所有工作人员的干预交付保真度至少达到80%。结论和临床意义:IPPI计划是治疗PLWD的一种可行的非药物干预措施,可以在养老院由工作人员长期忠实地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信