Impacting the rugby tackle: risk factors and mechanisms for concussion and musculoskeletal tackle-related injury - a systematic review and Delphi consensus to inform intervention strategies for risk reduction.

IF 16.2 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Mike Hopkinson, Sharief Hendricks, Ben Jones, Gareth Nicholson, Jon S Patricios, Kathryn Dane, Andrew J Gardner, David R Howell, Cameron Owen, Kenneth L Quarrie, Gregory Tierney, Kevin Till, Fiona Wilson, Rich D Johnston
{"title":"Impacting the rugby tackle: risk factors and mechanisms for concussion and musculoskeletal tackle-related injury - a systematic review and Delphi consensus to inform intervention strategies for risk reduction.","authors":"Mike Hopkinson, Sharief Hendricks, Ben Jones, Gareth Nicholson, Jon S Patricios, Kathryn Dane, Andrew J Gardner, David R Howell, Cameron Owen, Kenneth L Quarrie, Gregory Tierney, Kevin Till, Fiona Wilson, Rich D Johnston","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To (1) systematically review the literature to identify which match-related risk factors and mechanisms of rugby tackle events result in musculoskeletal injury, concussion, head injury assessments, and head impacts or head accelerations; and (2) identify the perceived importance and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for tackle-related injury reduction in the rugby codes.A systematic search was performed using Preferred Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk factors/mechanisms associated with tackle injuries across the rugby codes were extracted. After extraction, 50 international rugby experts participated in a Delphi poll. Via content analysis, expert-recommended risk factors/mechanisms were developed. In round two, experts rated all risk factors and mechanisms for importance to injury risk. In round three, the feasibility of law changes, coach and player education, and training as interventions to reduce injury risk for each injury risk factor/mechanism deemed important during round two was rated.PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost) and CINAHL.Eligible studies included cohort, observational and cross-sectional designs, which included male or female rugby union, league or sevens players.37 eligible studies were identified, with 138 injury risk factors/mechanisms extracted. 70% of the studies were rated 'high quality', with 30% moderate quality. 38 new risk factors/mechanisms were recommended by the expert group, 8 being identified as important and highly feasible for modification by an intervention strategy. 'The tackler placing their head on the incorrect side of the ball carrier' was described as the most important mechanism, with 'training' and 'coach/player education' thought to be highly feasible interventions.Numerous risk factors or mechanisms associated with tackle-related injury appear important and modifiable, helping to guide interventions to reduce injury risk in the rugby tackle.</p>","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1397-1409"},"PeriodicalIF":16.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108992","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To (1) systematically review the literature to identify which match-related risk factors and mechanisms of rugby tackle events result in musculoskeletal injury, concussion, head injury assessments, and head impacts or head accelerations; and (2) identify the perceived importance and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for tackle-related injury reduction in the rugby codes.A systematic search was performed using Preferred Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk factors/mechanisms associated with tackle injuries across the rugby codes were extracted. After extraction, 50 international rugby experts participated in a Delphi poll. Via content analysis, expert-recommended risk factors/mechanisms were developed. In round two, experts rated all risk factors and mechanisms for importance to injury risk. In round three, the feasibility of law changes, coach and player education, and training as interventions to reduce injury risk for each injury risk factor/mechanism deemed important during round two was rated.PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost) and CINAHL.Eligible studies included cohort, observational and cross-sectional designs, which included male or female rugby union, league or sevens players.37 eligible studies were identified, with 138 injury risk factors/mechanisms extracted. 70% of the studies were rated 'high quality', with 30% moderate quality. 38 new risk factors/mechanisms were recommended by the expert group, 8 being identified as important and highly feasible for modification by an intervention strategy. 'The tackler placing their head on the incorrect side of the ball carrier' was described as the most important mechanism, with 'training' and 'coach/player education' thought to be highly feasible interventions.Numerous risk factors or mechanisms associated with tackle-related injury appear important and modifiable, helping to guide interventions to reduce injury risk in the rugby tackle.

影响橄榄球铲球:脑震荡和肌肉骨骼铲球相关损伤的风险因素和机制——一项系统回顾和德尔菲共识,为降低风险的干预策略提供信息。
(1)系统地回顾文献,以确定橄榄球铲球事件导致肌肉骨骼损伤、脑震荡、头部损伤评估和头部撞击或头部加速度的比赛相关危险因素和机制;(2)确定橄榄球规则中减少铲球相关伤害的潜在干预策略的重要性和可行性。采用首选报告系统评价和荟萃分析指南进行系统搜索。提取了橄榄球规则中与铲球受伤相关的风险因素/机制。抽取后,50名国际橄榄球专家参加了德尔菲民意调查。通过内容分析,制定了专家推荐的风险因素/机制。在第二轮中,专家们对伤害风险的所有风险因素和机制进行了评估。在第三轮中,对第二轮中认为重要的每个伤害风险因素/机制进行法律变更、教练和球员教育以及训练作为干预措施来降低伤害风险的可行性进行评估。PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost)和CINAHL。符合条件的研究包括队列、观察和横断面设计,包括男性或女性橄榄球联盟、联盟或七人制球员。确定了37项符合条件的研究,提取了138个损伤危险因素/机制。70%的研究被评为“高质量”,30%的研究被评为中等质量。专家组建议了38个新的风险因素/机制,其中8个被确定为重要的和高度可行的,可以通过干预战略加以修改。“铲球者把头放在持球者不正确的一侧”被认为是最重要的机制,“训练”和“教练/球员教育”被认为是非常可行的干预措施。许多与铲球相关的伤害相关的风险因素或机制显得重要且可修改,有助于指导干预措施以降低橄榄球铲球中的伤害风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信