Microorganisms identified in neonatal sepsis and their antimicrobial resistance in a hospital in Western Mexico.

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Juan C Lona-Reyes, Braulio Guillén-Chávez, Lucia Miramontes-Buiza, Larissa M Gómez-Ruiz, Moisés Quiles-Corona, René O Pérez-Ramírez, Brandon J de la Cruz-Bravo
{"title":"Microorganisms identified in neonatal sepsis and their antimicrobial resistance in a hospital in Western Mexico.","authors":"Juan C Lona-Reyes, Braulio Guillén-Chávez, Lucia Miramontes-Buiza, Larissa M Gómez-Ruiz, Moisés Quiles-Corona, René O Pérez-Ramírez, Brandon J de la Cruz-Bravo","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.25000002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal sepsis is a serious condition that increases neonatal mortality. The objective of this study was to describe the microorganisms causing neonatal sepsis and their resistance patterns in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted. Microorganisms identified in blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures from newborns (NBs) admitted to the Nuevo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Dr. Juan I. Menchaca were studied. Microorganism identification and susceptibility testing were performed using VITEK<sup>®</sup> 2. The cutoff points for classifying resistance were according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Infections were classified as early-onset sepsis (EOS) or late-onset sepsis (LOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 NBs with EOS and 261 with LOS were identified; the incidence rate of EOS was 7.1 events/1000 live births and of LOS was 25.5 events/1000 live births. In both infections, the risk was significantly higher in premature NBs and/or NBs with birth weight < 2500 g. The predominant etiology in all infections was Enterobacterales (63.3%). In EOS, resistance to first-line antibiotics for Enterobacterales was ampicillin 46.6% (27/58) and gentamicin 24.1% (14/58), while in LOS, it was ampicillin 63.7% (186/292) and gentamicin 28.1% (82/292). The second most frequently identified bacteria were Staphylococcus spp. 13.6% (n = 75) with oxacillin resistance of 78.7% (59/75). No ampicillin-resistant Streptococcus spp. or Enterococcus spp. was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of EOS and LOS in a Mexican NICU was 7.1 and 25.5 events/1000 live births, and the main etiologies were Enterobacterales and Staphylococcus spp.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"82 4","pages":"219-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.25000002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis is a serious condition that increases neonatal mortality. The objective of this study was to describe the microorganisms causing neonatal sepsis and their resistance patterns in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted. Microorganisms identified in blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures from newborns (NBs) admitted to the Nuevo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Dr. Juan I. Menchaca were studied. Microorganism identification and susceptibility testing were performed using VITEK® 2. The cutoff points for classifying resistance were according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Infections were classified as early-onset sepsis (EOS) or late-onset sepsis (LOS).

Results: A total of 73 NBs with EOS and 261 with LOS were identified; the incidence rate of EOS was 7.1 events/1000 live births and of LOS was 25.5 events/1000 live births. In both infections, the risk was significantly higher in premature NBs and/or NBs with birth weight < 2500 g. The predominant etiology in all infections was Enterobacterales (63.3%). In EOS, resistance to first-line antibiotics for Enterobacterales was ampicillin 46.6% (27/58) and gentamicin 24.1% (14/58), while in LOS, it was ampicillin 63.7% (186/292) and gentamicin 28.1% (82/292). The second most frequently identified bacteria were Staphylococcus spp. 13.6% (n = 75) with oxacillin resistance of 78.7% (59/75). No ampicillin-resistant Streptococcus spp. or Enterococcus spp. was identified.

Conclusions: The incidence of EOS and LOS in a Mexican NICU was 7.1 and 25.5 events/1000 live births, and the main etiologies were Enterobacterales and Staphylococcus spp.

墨西哥西部一家医院新生儿败血症中发现的微生物及其抗菌素耐药性。
背景:新生儿败血症是一种严重的疾病,可增加新生儿死亡率。本研究的目的是描述在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)引起新生儿败血症的微生物及其耐药模式。方法:采用横断面队列研究。研究了在瓜达拉哈拉新民用医院Juan I. Menchaca博士收治的新生儿(NBs)血液或脑脊液培养物中发现的微生物。使用VITEK®2进行微生物鉴定和药敏试验。耐药性分类的分界点依据临床与实验室标准协会。感染分为早发性脓毒症(EOS)和晚发性脓毒症(LOS)。结果:共鉴定出73例伴有EOS的NBs和261例伴有LOS的NBs;EOS发生率为7.1例/1000活产,LOS发生率为25.5例/1000活产。在这两种感染中,早产新生儿和/或出生体重< 2500克的新生儿的风险明显更高。所有感染的主要病原是肠杆菌(63.3%)。EOS组肠杆菌对一线抗生素的耐药率分别为氨苄西林46.6%(27/58)和庆大霉素24.1% (14/58),LOS组氨苄西林63.7%(186/292)和庆大霉素28.1%(82/292)。第二常见的细菌是葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus spp),占13.6% (n = 75),耐氧西林的占78.7%(59/75)。未检出耐氨苄西林链球菌或肠球菌。结论:墨西哥某NICU发生EOS和LOS的发生率分别为7.1例和25.5例/1000例活产,主要病因为肠杆菌和葡萄球菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信