Injectable contraceptive use in women with intellectual disability: narrative review and service evaluation.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2025.786
Marianne Bergman, Alaa Martin
{"title":"Injectable contraceptive use in women with intellectual disability: narrative review and service evaluation.","authors":"Marianne Bergman, Alaa Martin","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intellectual disability is defined as an IQ of 70 or below. Women with intellectual disability frequently experience menstrual distress leading to the use of hormonal medications such as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA). Despite risks such as reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and weight gain, DMPA is widely used in this cohort, prompting investigation into its suitability and risks.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>A narrative review and local service evaluation were conducted to determine whether clinical management reflected recommendations in the literature.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PsycINFO and Medline were searched for articles post-1995 on contraception in menstruating women with intellectual disability. Contraceptive use in 100 randomly selected women was evaluated. Data were collected on physical health issues, general practitioner records were reviewed for contraceptive administration and risk discussions, and surveys assessed risk understanding and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified 27 papers with higher DMPA use in the intellectual disability population compared to the general population, and specific BMD risks. The case series found 23 women with intellectual disability using DMPA, and revealed knowledge gaps in risk and monitoring, inappropriate use given individual risk, and poor proactive risk management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate disproportionate DMPA use in women with intellectual disability, with inadequate clinical justification and risk awareness. Many women and carers were unaware of BMD risks, and DMPA alternatives were rarely considered. Individualised contraceptive management and closer review of DMPA use in this cohort is needed. Monitoring could include dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, and weight management. Further research is needed into higher DMPA use and risks within this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intellectual disability is defined as an IQ of 70 or below. Women with intellectual disability frequently experience menstrual distress leading to the use of hormonal medications such as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA). Despite risks such as reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and weight gain, DMPA is widely used in this cohort, prompting investigation into its suitability and risks.

Aims: A narrative review and local service evaluation were conducted to determine whether clinical management reflected recommendations in the literature.

Method: PsycINFO and Medline were searched for articles post-1995 on contraception in menstruating women with intellectual disability. Contraceptive use in 100 randomly selected women was evaluated. Data were collected on physical health issues, general practitioner records were reviewed for contraceptive administration and risk discussions, and surveys assessed risk understanding and satisfaction.

Results: The review identified 27 papers with higher DMPA use in the intellectual disability population compared to the general population, and specific BMD risks. The case series found 23 women with intellectual disability using DMPA, and revealed knowledge gaps in risk and monitoring, inappropriate use given individual risk, and poor proactive risk management.

Conclusions: Findings indicate disproportionate DMPA use in women with intellectual disability, with inadequate clinical justification and risk awareness. Many women and carers were unaware of BMD risks, and DMPA alternatives were rarely considered. Individualised contraceptive management and closer review of DMPA use in this cohort is needed. Monitoring could include dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, and weight management. Further research is needed into higher DMPA use and risks within this population.

智力残疾妇女注射避孕药的使用:叙述回顾和服务评价。
背景:智力残疾被定义为智商在70或以下。患有智力障碍的女性经常经历月经困扰,导致使用激素药物,如醋酸甲孕酮(DMPA)。尽管存在降低骨密度(BMD)和体重增加等风险,但DMPA在该队列中广泛使用,促使对其适用性和风险的调查。目的:进行叙述性回顾和当地服务评估,以确定临床管理是否反映了文献中的建议。方法:检索心理信息(PsycINFO)和Medline网站1995年以后有关经期智障妇女避孕的文章。对随机选择的100名妇女的避孕药具使用情况进行了评估。收集了关于身体健康问题的数据,审查了全科医生的避孕药具管理和风险讨论记录,并进行了调查,评估了对风险的理解和满意度。结果:该综述确定了27篇论文,与一般人群相比,智障人群中DMPA的使用更高,并且具有特定的BMD风险。该案例系列发现23名智障女性使用DMPA,并揭示了风险和监测方面的知识差距,个人风险的不当使用以及主动性风险管理不力。结论:研究结果表明,智力残疾妇女使用DMPA不成比例,临床理由和风险意识不足。许多妇女和护理人员不知道BMD风险,很少考虑DMPA替代方案。需要个体化避孕管理和更密切地审查DMPA在这一队列中的使用。监测可包括双x线吸收仪(DEXA)扫描、维生素D和钙补充以及体重管理。需要进一步研究这一人群中DMPA的使用和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信